Ntxw wrote:Truly amazing how quickly the ocean can change. From quite an el nino last winter to a complete 180 strong la nina! It's interesting what NY NJ PA Weather mentioned about positive and negative PDO. I've only heard JB mention this a few times from which I learned about. Sometimes we forget to include these warm/cold periods into the predictions. It'll be interesting to see how it pans out. It's a pity we don't have satellite and extensive data prior to the 50s and 60s to use as detailed analogs.
Could this Nina along with the negative PDO finally bring down the stretch of above temperatures worldwide? Got a hunch it might this winter.
And there in lies the question with the negative PDO. The last time we had a -PDO pattern, we had no where near the observational data we have under a +PDO phase. In fact, roughly 90% of the data we have people running around comparing is under a +PDO regime, which is exactly why I have doubts with the very warm anomalies in the Northeast and Northern Mid Atlantic. A -PDO phase typically produces a lower heights anomaly around the Aleutian Islands and a very large ridge in the Gulf of Alaska, which CAN produce a negative EPO pattern. Now, all of this does not work on it's own.
What I mean is that we have to piece everything together. Instead of studying analogs that frankly poorly match what is going on now in terms of solar influences, PDO state, intensity of ENSO state, change in AMO; we have to study how these features are interacting with each other over the next 30 to 45 days, adjust for changes in wave lengths, take into account the stratospheric potential, and go from there. NOT easy. Not easy at all.
Give the uncertainty, this year I would rate the volatility threat of this winters forecast overall to be VERY HIGH.