WeatherEmperor wrote:
I am glad you brought that up. Why is it bad to follow what models say? If models were showing tropical cyclone after tropical cyclone, we would be told see the models are right. And these improving conditions you are talking about....they were supposed to be here by now...but they arent totally yet. Instead of going back and forth about how fast improving conditions will arrive, why cant we just let mother nature do what mother nature wants? Also, why cant everybody, pro met and amateaur alike just admit that maybe we dont know as much about predicting hurricanes as we think we know?
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE
To understand the models you have to understand how they operate and past verification of how accurate they are. In the 5 day time frame, for example, most of the models miss over 50% of development.
Knowing this, why would anyone look to the models to tell them, definitively, if the season was about to pick up?
We have been told that the MJO pulse was going to be strong and should increase chances of development once it moves into the Atlantic. For the past week the pulse has increased in strength but has not moved out of the EPAC, now it is moving (or drifting) this way.
Does this mean more tropical storms? I'm not qualified to answer that, I'm just observing and trying to document so I have a better idea next time around.
The GFS and Euro both have a clear factual record of performance. Any discussion about A not happening because model B doesn't show it is simply ignoring the facts and possibilities. This report on model performance was linked to earlier, here it is again:
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=2504 -
The paper looked at 135 Atlantic genesis events over the period 2004 - 2011, as predicted by five global computer weather forecast models: the GFS, ECMWF, UKMET, NOGAPS, and Canadian GEM.Graph of probabilities over all hours (6 to 96 hours)

For all hours the best performance is still 50/50, with the UK, Euro, and GFS within 5% of each other. I take this to mean that if a model predicts genesis in day 1-5 and genesis happens somewhere in that time frame then the model scores a hit. In addition, statistics were measured as to how well models did at each time frame, with a model scoring a hit if it predicted genesis at the time that it happened. In 2011 the GFS was best with a paltry 22% detection rate.