91C.Invest - Very far to the north (42.5 N, 146.5 W)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

#41 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:48 pm

Link


Looking good, also the system is looking more tropical.


EDIT: URL changed to hyperlink. -senorpepr
Don't forget again.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

#42 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:50 pm

Looks tropical to me. Probably at least a sub tropical storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

#43 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:59 pm

0 likes   

Coredesat

#44 Postby Coredesat » Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:14 am

EPAC TWD:

A DEEP LAYERED CYCLONE IS LOCATED WELL NW OF THE AREA NEAR
42N145W...SHIFTING SE...WITH A SHORTWAVE TROUGH EXTENDING S
ALONG 32N138W 19N138W.
TO THE SE...AN UPPER ANTICYCLONE IS NEAR
14N114W WITH A RIDGE EXTENDING NW CRESTING GENTLY ALONG POINTS
20N137W 25N128W 23N116W. A WEAKENING SHORTWAVE TROUGH IS NOTED N
OF 24N ALONG 111W. A BAND OF STRONG DRY UPPER AIR IS INDICATED
WITHIN 120 NM EITHER SIDE OF LINE 30N100W 26N115W 28N127W
25N134W...AND A SECOND BAND IS NOTED WITHIN 90 NM EITHER SIDE OF
LINE 20N100W 20N100W 19N124W 12N140W. DEBRIS MOISTURE FROM ITCZ
CONVECTION BETWEEN 100W AND 126W IS STREAMING ENE TO THE S OF
THE SECOND DRY AIR BAND MENTIONED ABOVE.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7284
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#45 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:31 am

I have to ask has a hurricane or tropical- subtropical storm ever hit Oregon
0 likes   

User avatar
WmE
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 696
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

#46 Postby WmE » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:06 am

Hurricaneman wrote:I have to ask has a hurricane or tropical- subtropical storm ever hit Oregon


I don't think so.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#47 Postby Chacor » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:16 am

Convection around this system is now concentrated to the north of the centre. No more on the south.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#48 Postby P.K. » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:18 am

The 1200 GMT position is very close to crossing to RSMC Miami's AOR.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#49 Postby Chacor » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:40 am

As of 1300 UTC, up to 30 kt, at 140.2W. It is possible that RSMC Miami might choose to pick this up perhaps as a depression.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#50 Postby Chacor » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:23 am

Jeff Masters picked it up as a "Thingamabobbercane"... or subtropical storm.

EDIT: He also agrees:

"The spiral bands of showers and eye/eyewall appearance look very similar to Hurricane Epsilon of 2005, which formed over waters of 75-77 F (22-23C). If Thingamabobbercane had been in the Atlantic, it would likely have been given a name and called a subtropical cyclone. The Central Pacific Hurricane Center in Honolulu isn't even mentioning it in their Tropical Weather Outlook, so Thingamabobbercane is not going to get a name. "
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#51 Postby P.K. » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:41 am

From a few hours ago.

HIGH SEAS FORECAST FOR METAREA XI
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WASHINGTON DC
OCEAN PREDICTION CENTER/OFB 1145 UTC NOV 02 2006
SUPERSEDED BY NEXT ISSUANCE IN 6 HOURS

SECURITE
PACIFIC N OF 30N AND S OF 67N E OF A LINE FROM BERING STRAIT
TO 50N 160E TO 30N 160E.

SYNOPSIS VALID 0600 UTC NOV 02.
24 HOUR FORECAST VALID 0600 UTC NOV 03.
48 HOUR FORECAST VALID 0600 UTC NOV 04.

...GALE WARNING...
.LOW 43N 143W 990 MB MOVING NE 20 KT. WINDS 25 TO 35 KT SEAS 10
TO 16 FT BETWEEN 180 NM AND 480 NM N QUADRANT...AND WITHIN 540
NM S QUADRANT. ALSO WINDS 20 TO 30 KT SEAS 8 TO 12 FT FROM 38N
TO 49N E OF 129W.
.24 HOUR FORECAST LOW 45N 134W 994 MB. FORECAST WINDS 20 TO 30
KT SEAS 10 TO 16 FT WITHIN 420 NM SE SEMICIRCLE...AND WITHIN 300
NM NW QUADRANT.
.48 HOUR FORECAST LOW 50N 128W 994 MB. FORECAST WINDS 20 TO 30
KT SEAS 10 TO 14 FT WITHIN 540 NM S QUADRANT.
0 likes   

User avatar
WmE
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 696
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

#52 Postby WmE » Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:58 pm

Now 35 kt at 137.4N!
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#53 Postby P.K. » Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:10 pm

WHXX01 KMIA 021828
CHGE77

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO TPC/NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONES.

NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER CENTRAL PACIFIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

TROPICAL STORM INVEST (CP912006) ON 20061102 1800 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
061102 1800 061103 0600 061103 1800 061104 0600

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 43.0N 137.4W 45.1N 130.4W 47.8N 124.2W 50.2N 117.6W
BAMM 43.0N 137.4W 44.9N 132.1W 47.4N 127.5W 49.9N 122.8W
LBAR 43.0N 137.4W 44.7N 130.5W 46.4N 123.1W 48.1N 115.5W
SHIP 35KTS 32KTS 32KTS 32KTS
DSHP 35KTS 32KTS 32KTS 30KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
061104 1800 061105 1800 061106 1800 061107 1800

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 51.5N 109.4W 51.1N 93.1W 50.1N 76.2W 48.6N 55.7W
BAMM 52.0N 116.9W 54.1N 105.3W 54.3N 94.1W 54.4N 82.3W
LBAR 49.9N 108.2W .0N .0W .0N .0W .0N .0W
SHIP 30KTS 0KTS 0KTS 0KTS
DSHP 30KTS 0KTS 0KTS 0KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 43.0N LONCUR = 137.4W DIRCUR = 75DEG SPDCUR = 23KT
LATM12 = 41.8N LONM12 = 143.1W DIRM12 = 89DEG SPDM12 = 21KT
LATM24 = 42.5N LONM24 = 146.5W
WNDCUR = 35KT RMAXWD = 40NM WNDM12 = 30KT
CENPRS = 990MB OUTPRS = 998MB OUTRAD = 180NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 30NM RD34SE = 40NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
0 likes   

Coredesat

#54 Postby Coredesat » Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:21 pm

The center has become exposed. The way it looks now, I doubt it will be classified by anyone, even the NHC.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#55 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:37 pm

If this was officially classified, what would it be?
0 likes   

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

#56 Postby Derecho » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:48 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:If this was officially classified, what would it be?



I'm really surprised popping in here that this thread went on for three pages without "polar lows" being mentioned - this issue has been extensively discussed over on Eastern (with many people believing, with some justification, that this feature is in fact a Polar Low.)

They're small warm-core storms that form in the Arctic - actually this is a bit far south for one. They've never been officially classified by any tropical forecasting agency

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_low
0 likes   

Coredesat

#57 Postby Coredesat » Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:38 pm

It's been brought up in the Wikipedia tropical cyclone project chat room, actually. It is a bit far south to be a polar low, but I know that polar lows generally don't last very long. Hmm. :think:
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 41
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#58 Postby senorpepr » Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:31 am

Here is my full analysis of the situation: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=90971

A quick blurb on it: It's not tropical or sub-tropical. What we have on our hands here is a warm-seclusion on an extratropical frontal wave/low.

See the link that I provided for full synoptic story.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#59 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:25 am

senorpepr wrote:Here is my full analysis of the situation: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=90971

A quick blurb on it: It's not tropical or sub-tropical. What we have on our hands here is a warm-seclusion on an extratropical frontal wave/low.

See the link that I provided for full synoptic story.


Good analysis. I do believe that despite it's satellite appearance the system was probably more extratropical characteristics. We had many Nor'easters during that go under rapid intensification off the Mid-Atlantic and New England coast, that have eye-like feature on visible imagery to them as well.But they are much easier to classify as extratropical because they are much larger and have well-defined fronts.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#60 Postby P.K. » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:17 am

I don't think the upper atmosphere was really cold enough for a polar low anyway. Around my area the 500hPa temperature needs to be around -40C with SSTs maybe 7C or so lower than in this case, but if you look at the initialisation of the GFS from just after this appeared on the NRL it was way below this at around -18C. Don't quote me on that temperature being the correct one for this area though. :wink:

Image
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AlwaysLovedPancakes, chaser1, cycloneye, FireRat, Google Adsense [Bot], Lizzytiz1, South Texas Storms, TheWisestofAll, weatherSnoop, zzzh and 65 guests