Reanalysis questions

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricane Jed
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 542
Age: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Cen Tex

#161 Postby Hurricane Jed » Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:51 pm

Just read the data. 175mph is still a respectable windspeed at landfall. The 900mb pressure at landfall ties it with Gilbert as the second most intense to make landfall in the Western Hemisphere. The pressure also moves it into sole possession of 6th place of most intense Atlantic hurricanes.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5272
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Reanalysis questions - Camille 1969 reanalysis completed

#162 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:12 pm

Wow, Camille is more intense than previously thought, especially central pressure. :eek: :shocked!:
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Reanalysis questions - Camille 1969 reanalysis completed

#163 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:35 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:Wow, Camille is more intense than previously thought, especially central pressure. :eek: :shocked!:


The 900 is actually a data compromise based on a 904 pressure from another barometer that was discovered near the radar center and a suspect reading of 897.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Jed
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 542
Age: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Cen Tex

#164 Postby Hurricane Jed » Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:32 pm

Wonder if Allen will get its peak winds dropped too
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re:

#165 Postby HurricaneBill » Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:23 pm

Hurricane Jed wrote:Wonder if Allen will get its peak winds dropped too


I'm not sure. Didn't Allen have some of the highest flight level winds recorded?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#166 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:30 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:
Hurricane Jed wrote:Wonder if Allen will get its peak winds dropped too


I'm not sure. Didn't Allen have some of the highest flight level winds recorded?


I think Allen will be found at 160 or 165 kt - but its peak winds and peak pressure will be at different points. The 910mb pressure found in the far eastern Atlantic, early in the lifespan, would likely support that intensity given its small size and rapid motion (Dean carried 145 kt with a 929mb pressure), while the 899mb pressure near the Yucatan was with a larger, slower storm (I'd go 150-155 kt at that time).

Red indicates changes I would make based on reading the reports - note: NOT AN OFFICIAL BT, but based on my analysis:

AL041980, ALLEN, 46,
19800731, 1200, , DB, 11.0N, 30.0W, 25, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800731, 1800, , DB, 10.9N, 32.2W, 25, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800801, 0000, , TD, 10.8N, 34.3W, 30, 1013, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800801, 0600, , TD, 10.7N, 36.4W, 30, 1013, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800801, 1200, , TD, 10.7N, 38.6W, 30, 1011, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800801, 1800, , TD, 10.7N, 40.7W, 30, 1010, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800802, 0000, , TS, 11.0N, 42.8W, 35, 1008, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800802, 0600, , TS, 11.4N, 44.8W, 45, 1004, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800802, 1200, , TS, 11.9N, 46.9W, 55, 1000, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800802, 1800, , TS, 12.3N, 49.1W, 60, 997, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800803, 0000, , HU, 12.4N, 51.4W, 65, 994, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800803, 0600, , HU, 12.6N, 53.6W, 80, 984, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800803, 1200, , HU, 12.8N, 55.6W, 90, 978, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800803, 1800, , HU, 12.9N, 57.5W, 105, 967, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800804, 0000, , HU, 13.3N, 59.1W, 125, 950, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800804, 0600, , HU, 13.6N, 61.0W, 125, 948, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800804, 1200, , HU, 14.0N, 63.0W, 130, 945, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800804, 1800, , HU, 14.4N, 64.9W, 145, 930, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800805, 0000, , HU, 14.8N, 66.7W, 160, 911, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800805, 0600, , HU, 15.4N, 68.6W, 155, 915, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800805, 1200, , HU, 15.9N, 70.5W, 145, 928, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800805, 1800, , HU, 16.5N, 72.3W, 130, 937, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800806, 0000, , HU, 17.8N, 73.8W, 125, 943, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800806, 0600, , HU, 18.3N, 75.9W, 115, 951, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800806, 1200, , HU, 19.2N, 78.0W, 110, 955, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800806, 1800, , HU, 20.0N, 80.1W, 110, 953, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800807, 0000, , HU, 20.1N, 81.9W, 120, 946, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800807, 0600, , HU, 20.4N, 83.6W, 135, 933, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800807, 1200, , HU, 21.0N, 84.8W, 150, 910, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800807, 1800, , HU, 21.8N, 86.4W, 155, 899, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800808, 0000, , HU, 22.2N, 87.9W, 145, 916, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800808, 0600, , HU, 22.8N, 89.2W, 120, 942, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800808, 1200, , HU, 23.4N, 90.5W, 100, 958, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800808, 1800, , HU, 23.9N, 91.8W, 115, 938, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800809, 0000, , HU, 24.5N, 93.0W, 140, 914, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800809, 0600, , HU, 25.0N, 94.2W, 145, 909, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800809, 1200, , HU, 25.2N, 95.4W, 135, 918, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800809, 1800, , HU, 25.4N, 96.1W, 125, 922, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800810, 0000, , HU, 25.8N, 96.8W, 110, 935, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800810, 0515, L, HU, 26.0N, 97.1W, 100, 945, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800810, 0600, , HU, 26.1N, 97.2W, 95, 949, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800810, 1200, , HU, 26.7N, 98.1W, 75, 966, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800810, 1800, , TS, 27.3N, 99.0W, 60, 976, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800811, 0000, , TS, 27.7N, 99.8W, 40, 990, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800811, 0600, , TS, 28.0N, 100.9W, 35, 996, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800811, 1200, , TD, 28.5N, 101.9W, 30, 1005, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
19800811, 1800, , TD, 28.9N, 102.9W, 30, 1008, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999, -999,
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Reanalysis questions

#167 Postby wxman57 » Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:55 pm

I'm in San Diego at the 31st AMS conference on tropical meteorology. Saw a talk by Margie Kieper yesterday on Camille. She had a loop from the New Orleans radar - an image every 10 min from when it came in range. Could really see the double eye structure. New Orleans was taking a snapshot of radar every minute during Camille, but Margie could only get the 10-min images for free.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Jed
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 542
Age: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Cen Tex

#168 Postby Hurricane Jed » Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:12 pm

:uarrow: That's pretty cool.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5792
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: Reanalysis questions

#169 Postby MGC » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:28 pm

57,what do you mean she could only get the 10-min image for free? I'd like to see that loop.....MGC
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: Reanalysis questions

#170 Postby HurricaneBill » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:40 pm

Back in 1991, the Weather Channel aired a special that was later released on VHS called "Danger's Edge". It was about past hurricanes that had struck the U.S.

Anyway, I remember there being a loop of satellite or radar images of Camille from birth to landfall on the Gulf coast. I can't remember if it was an actual loop or an animation based on satellite images. Does anybody else remember this?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAKFDWaTinM[/youtube]
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Reanalysis questions

#171 Postby wxman57 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:04 pm

MGC wrote:57,what do you mean she could only get the 10-min image for free? I'd like to see that loop.....MGC


It was a lot of work to convert the 1-min negatives to digital images. Margie asked what she could get "for free" and that was 10% of the images. Even with the images in digital format, she still had to map them to a grid to make the loop, which took about 60hrs work. Everyone was asking her for the radar loop but I don't think she wanted to distribute copies. The loop will eventually be public, most likely.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5792
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: Reanalysis questions

#172 Postby MGC » Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:45 pm

Thanks for the info 57....lean somthing new every day here.....MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#173 Postby Hammy » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:13 pm

Any idea if/when a preliminary will be released for 1955-64 similar to what was released for 1944-53?
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139025
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Reanalysis questions

#174 Postby cycloneye » Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:48 am

The 1935 labor day hurricane was upgraded to the strongest over Camille.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/browar ... 2453.story
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: Reanalysis questions

#175 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:27 pm

I wonder what the 1935 Labor Day hurricane would have looked like on satellite imagery?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Reanalysis questions

#176 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun May 04, 2014 4:01 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:I wonder what the 1935 Labor Day hurricane would have looked like on satellite imagery?


Probably a lot like Gilbert or Wilma.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#177 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun May 04, 2014 4:03 pm

Some notes: I saw the video on the 1955-64 reanalysis (completed to 1961 as of its writing), and Audrey's basis for 105 kt is a pressure of 950mb at landfall, with a medium sized storm. I know an earlier report had 80 kt with a massive 955mb storm, that was probably too low?
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: Reanalysis questions

#178 Postby HurricaneBill » Sun May 04, 2014 4:46 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:I wonder what the 1935 Labor Day hurricane would have looked like on satellite imagery?


Probably a lot like Gilbert or Wilma.


Can't be. The 1935 was supposedly a very small system. I'm wondering if it would have looked like Iris in 2001 or Charley in 2004.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Reanalysis questions

#179 Postby wxman57 » Sun May 04, 2014 4:54 pm

MGC wrote:Thanks for the info 57....lean somthing new every day here.....MGC


The Camille loop was played at the NHC a few weeks ago. I recorded it from the front row on my ipad. Can post it.

Here it is. Give it a bit to load, it's 88MB:

http://home.comcast.net/~cgh57/Camille.MOV
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re:

#180 Postby Alyono » Sun May 04, 2014 5:41 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Some notes: I saw the video on the 1955-64 reanalysis (completed to 1961 as of its writing), and Audrey's basis for 105 kt is a pressure of 950mb at landfall, with a medium sized storm. I know an earlier report had 80 kt with a massive 955mb storm, that was probably too low?


Audrey has not been made official yet
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, NotSparta, TheAustinMan and 102 guests