There's a lot of moving parts to this one, to say the least. 2020 certainly won't be making it a clear-cut forecast, and we'll still probably be as confused as ever even when the Central American Gyre does form (or maybe it simply doesn't). The action begins in the Eastern Pacific where SSTs are toasting at 30C and upper-level winds should be on the lighter side. It's an
active scene out there this afternoon with thunderstorms galore, aided perhaps by a tropical wave that's currently analyzed over the western Caribbean and Honduras (the same one may have supported Bertha's genesis).
The EPAC disturbance is quite broad right now, so it'll take some time to develop. The model guidance has a broad low becoming better established on Friday south of El Salvador.
After that... well, calling it a "mess" might be putting it lightly. CAGs are broad; sometimes they turn into TCs themselves (see the 06z GFS), sometimes they might spawn mesolows that may individually become TCs (see the 12z GFS), sometimes the gyre splits into several components that could potentially evolve into TCs (see the 12z GEM), and sometimes they fail to really get anything started (see the 00z ECMWF). Oftentimes the bundles of vorticity that rotate around the gyre intermittently interfere with each other, creating an aggravating soup of maybe-TCs and TC-wannabes and conditions ripe for hair-pulling from forecasters, all the while producing flooding rainfall over Central America.
A crossover storm? One storm in the EPAC and one in the ATL? One or more storms in the EPAC and none in the ATL? No storms at all? All options are still on the table with a decent shot at verifying.
I talked about some of this in an earlier post, and the descriptions there are applicable here. Given how much depends on where/when/if this CAG sets up, I'd suggest continuing to use the ensemble guidance (EPS, GEFS, GEPS, etc.) as a starting point even as the event moves into the shorter range where deterministic guidance is often used.
I'll be taking this one step at a time. The first step is monitoring how possible-Amanda evolves in the eastern Pacific—how much it strengthens and where it tracks. Perhaps it might saunter westward, taking the vorticity from Central America along with it and dragging it to sea, or perhaps it might swing into Central America and add a whole bunch of vorticity into the Atlantic side of the isthmus. As for now, the NHC has this tagged as having an 80% of developing within 5 days. That will only be the start of this whole atmospheric jumble.