Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:vbhoutex wrote:You know what folks? This thread is very close to being locked. The petty arguing going on is ridiculous. Different people have posted the facts concerning this basin. NOTHING any of you say is going to change what is official out there at this time. If you want it changed contact the WMO directly with facts, requests, etc. that may have an effect on any decision they can make concerning this. From what I have read in this thread, it was not a tropical cyclone by definition. What some may want and what actually happened are two different things based on the current parameters in place for designating tropical cyclones. STOP the petty arguments and either discuss the system or other possible Meditteranean systems or this thread will be locked and appropriate actions as necessary will be taken by staff.
I will stop vbhoutex, but what parameters did this not get? I understand they can't name it and your right about going to the WMO. But a case could be argued that was close to definition, of a warm core system based on fsu data. I know, I know we need more then that. But these are two interesting systems.
Matt, go back and read Jeff Master's blog. It pretty clearly states that this did not meet all the parameters for a TC, but he does still try to intimate it was one or at least similar to one. IMO, based just on what he wrote it did not meet the parameters for a named TC. No definite warm core etc.