WindRunner wrote:This is immature folks. I have seen this thead stay up towards the top of the board the past few days, but didn't realize some people were arguing for the impossible in it.
To state it simply, if it isn't yet clear: Look on the map below:
It is oficially IMPOSSIBLE for a tropical cyclone to be named outside of one of these regions. I think the boundary gets fudged in the Indian Ocean around the equator when it's occasionally necessary, and RSMC Miami will typically claim the entire North Atlantic as its official territory, but Meteo-France actually has the official high seas control east of 25W or so . . . in other words, the coast of Africa is technically out of the TPC's AOR, which means that making the Med officially TPC territory would be a real stretch, and would probably be seen as stepping on the toes of the European agencies.
You really think I don't know this already? I understand this, but also it was not about naming this. It was about treating it as a cyclone, as it should be. Also I've got great respect for the nhc, and thank god that they forecast all the way to the african coast. No one comes close to the nhc forecast; forecasters,computer models,satellite,surface data on earth. You can debate that, but I doubt you can get over your pride of your own forecast center. I understand hundred percent you feel that no ones better then your area forecast center, as I feel no ones better then the nhc. But look at the data and knowledge at the nhc. I highly doubt there is better team of hurricane forecasters on earth then the nhc. I thank god for the nhc forecasting right up to africa. But still I'm not a robot, I would not be interesting in science if I were to go along with the nhc at all times.
I wish they could forecast for the med. But they can't. It is understandable, does not mean that the people that do can't go over it, and have studies. Science is all about that. Science there is no yes or no answers, but just theory's to be proved or disproved.