Is the WRF an improvement on the old ETA?

If you have a question, don't care what it is ~ If you need a hand, We can assure you this ~ We can help

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Ed Mahmoud

Is the WRF an improvement on the old ETA?

#1 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:44 pm

I'd throw in the Canadian Mesoscale, but it ends about at my house.
Image


I know the WRF replaced the ETA as the NAM, but was it an improvement? I see criticisms of the NAM in respect to the GFS, even in winter weather situations in AFDs, (where you'd think higher resolution would give it an advantage) and I was wondering what the experts and amateurs thought.
0 likes   

User avatar
wall_cloud
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 401
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:32 am
Location: Bartlett, TN
Contact:

Re: Is the WRF an improvement on the old ETA?

#2 Postby wall_cloud » Wed Dec 24, 2008 2:43 am

I think its too early to tell. The problem with the WRF is that the equations will likely be changed often enough that a clear bias will be difficult to detect (like the GFS is tweaked now). The ETA had these biases that most forecasters were aware of. I think the NAM tends to do well in my neck of the woods. It generally handles the lee trof better than its counterparts but after 2 days, my confidence in the NAM drops significantly.
0 likes   


Return to “Got a question? I'm listening”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests