EPAC:INVEST 98E

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139027
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: EPAC:INVEST 98E

#21 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:33 pm

Confusion is over!

BEGIN
NHC_ATCF
invest_DEACTIVATE_ep982012.ren
FSTDA
R
U
040
010
0000
201209021513
NONE
NOTIFY=ATRP
END
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Top
User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15951
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:
Contact Yellow Evan

Re: EPAC:INVEST 98E

#22 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:36 pm

cycloneye wrote:Confusion is over!

BEGIN
NHC_ATCF
invest_DEACTIVATE_ep982012.ren
FSTDA
R
U
040
010
0000
201209021513
NONE
NOTIFY=ATRP
END


So, this invest no longer exists? I am still confused.
0 likes   
Top
hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2903
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

Re: EPAC:INVEST 98E

#23 Postby hurricanes1234 » Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:46 pm

Me too, because 98E was the 90% blob, 99E merged with 98E, so I would assume it dissipated. Remember 98E was the original one, the one that stayed at 30% for a long time. So why are they saying that 98E dissipated, when it actually formed into a tropical depression? I think they made a mistake.
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.
Top
User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15951
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:
Contact Yellow Evan

Re: EPAC:INVEST 98E

#24 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:47 pm

hurricanes1234 wrote:Me too, because 98E was the 90% blob, 99E merged with 98E, so I would assume it dissipated. Remember 98E was the original one, the one that stayed at 30% for a long time. So why are they saying that 98E dissipated, when it actually formed into a tropical depression? I think they made a mistake.


I think this is a test tbh.
0 likes   
Top
Post Reply

Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests