ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#221 Postby ozonepete » Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:36 pm

EquusStorm wrote:Yeah I doubt the NHC is going to classify it but it's definitely still organized now that convection has held on. Shame this will probably not be noted or documented officially since it basically meets all criteria.


No I'm saying that this has a very good chance of becoming a named TS in the next 24 hours. If you look at the previous SWIR loop I posted and now this one, you can see that the upper winds / shear may have been fast but as the lower level winds increase the LLC accelerates to catch up with the MLC and you can get a stacked TC over the Gulf Stream. This happens every once or twice in the Fall east of the mid-Atlantic or New England.

Image
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#222 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:00 pm

ozonepete wrote:
EquusStorm wrote:Yeah I doubt the NHC is going to classify it but it's definitely still organized now that convection has held on. Shame this will probably not be noted or documented officially since it basically meets all criteria.


No I'm saying that this has a very good chance of becoming a named TS in the next 24 hours. If you look at the previous SWIR loop I posted and now this one, you can see that the upper winds / shear may have been fast but as the lower level winds increase the LLC accelerates to catch up with the MLC and you can get a stacked TC over the Gulf Stream. This happens every once or twice in the Fall east of the mid-Atlantic or New England.

[url]http://i.imgur.com/rgQDyTo.gif [/url]


perfect example is hurricane "cant remember name" It was a B name years ago that developed an eye just off nova scotia

but started out like this until it begin to move.
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#223 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:04 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:
EquusStorm wrote:Yeah I doubt the NHC is going to classify it but it's definitely still organized now that convection has held on. Shame this will probably not be noted or documented officially since it basically meets all criteria.


No I'm saying that this has a very good chance of becoming a named TS in the next 24 hours. If you look at the previous SWIR loop I posted and now this one, you can see that the upper winds / shear may have been fast but as the lower level winds increase the LLC accelerates to catch up with the MLC and you can get a stacked TC over the Gulf Stream. This happens every once or twice in the Fall east of the mid-Atlantic or New England.

[url]http://i.imgur.com/rgQDyTo.gif [/url]


perfect example is hurricane "cant remember name" It was a B name years ago that developed an eye just off nova scotia


Was it Bill in 1997?

Image
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#224 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:05 pm

Hammy wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:
No I'm saying that this has a very good chance of becoming a named TS in the next 24 hours. If you look at the previous SWIR loop I posted and now this one, you can see that the upper winds / shear may have been fast but as the lower level winds increase the LLC accelerates to catch up with the MLC and you can get a stacked TC over the Gulf Stream. This happens every once or twice in the Fall east of the mid-Atlantic or New England.

[url]http://i.imgur.com/rgQDyTo.gif [/url]


perfect example is hurricane "cant remember name" It was a B name years ago that developed an eye just off nova scotia


Was it Bill in 1997?

https://i.imgur.com/QRIhFfv.png


yep thats it !
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#225 Postby EquusStorm » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:08 am

Well it's absolutely still out there with only a slightly dislocated at least midlevel center and highly persistent convection so it would certainly be neat if it did so! NHC removing it completely from the TWO seems a little premature, at least keep it in with a 0% or 10% until completely gone. Have seen far more unlikely storms get classified
1 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#226 Postby Hammy » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:49 am

EquusStorm wrote:Well it's absolutely still out there with only a slightly dislocated at least midlevel center and highly persistent convection so it would certainly be neat if it did so! NHC removing it completely from the TWO seems a little premature, at least keep it in with a 0% or 10% until completely gone. Have seen far more unlikely storms get classified


It seems they have no intent on upgrading this regardless of what happens at this point. I don't want to come off as NHC bashing but I do have to wonder sometimes if they weigh the model support a system has more than real time data when it comes to upgrading.
3 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#227 Postby EquusStorm » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:03 am

Can't say that I disagree with wondering the same. Not that they need to classify every swirl and blob not supported by most runs (and ironically this had some degree of support way back before it first developed of course) but this one was clearly a cut above most marginal events. I do wonder if the TD criteria has gotten more strict; we seem to have fewer than we did in some previous years/decades.
0 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7282
Age: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#228 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:44 am

I think this deserves to be upgraded to a tropical storm post season and a t.d for about 3-4 days of its life span.

Anything less would be disrespecting the historic record.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#229 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:08 am

FWIW this should be a TS right now..
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#230 Postby ozonepete » Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:42 am

I agree with all of you. There was no reason and still no reason to take it out yet. I'd bet the rent this gets upgraded after the season is over. This is a prime example of the rare occasion where the NHC makes up its mind prematurely. What bothers me is they just yank it and we don't get a reason why.

Here's how it looks this morning. In a low shear moist environment, with overshooting tops, traveling right over the Gulf stream.

Image
6 likes   

User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#231 Postby EquusStorm » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:07 pm

Looks even better now. I don't get it.

Image
0 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7282
Age: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#232 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:17 pm

There's storms I am truly complexed with why the nhc trends to avoid upgrading them and this is near the top. Somehow Leslie was upgraded in the middle of no where and probably never deserved it at all.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139046
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#233 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:43 pm

2 PM TWO:

Shower activity has become more concentrated in association with an
area of disturbed weather located about 250 miles southeast of Cape
Cod, Massachusetts. While satellite wind data indicate that the
system has gale-force winds, there are currently no signs of a
closed circulation. Little additional development of this system is
expected before it merges with a frontal system tonight. For more
information on this system, see High Seas Forecasts issued by the
National Weather Service.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...10 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...10 percent.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#234 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:56 pm

lol.. none

from earlier of course..

Image
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#235 Postby EquusStorm » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:01 pm

Hah, wow, didn't expect them to mention it again. Neat. ASCAT does seem to show that the west side may not be closed, so I guess I'm not surprised they won't classify it at the moment, but yesterday when it did have a closed center (albeit weak) and convection, they said the convection wasn't organized enough. Poor thing tried. :P
3 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#236 Postby ozonepete » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:02 pm

:uarrow: Obvioulsy closed. Bet you any money there are easterly winds on the north side of that circ. Damn! And 40-45 knot winds on the east side!
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#237 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:03 pm

ozonepete wrote::uarrow: Obvioulsy closed. Bet you any money there are easterly winds on the north side of that circ. Damn! And 40-45 knot winds on the east side!


Yeah very much so. comes down again to fast moving TC's with ASCAT again.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#238 Postby EquusStorm » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:07 pm

I hope they take a second look in the post-season and realize they should have classified it, like they did in 2013. And 2011. And 2006. And 2005. And 2000. And 1997. Point being, their operational track record in this area isn't perfect lol
4 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#239 Postby ozonepete » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:12 pm

EquusStorm wrote:I hope they take a second look in the post-season and realize they should have classified it, like they did in 2013. And 2011. And 2006. And 2005. And 2000. And 1997. Point being, their operational track record in this area isn't perfect lol


Lol really. Just really. C'mon. Guarantee you they re-classify this in the post season. 40 knot tropical storm or better. And it's not done yet.
1 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 98L - Discussion

#240 Postby ozonepete » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:18 pm

Banding with multiple pronounced hot towers on the east side. There's where your 40 knot winds are. :wink:

Image
1 likes   


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests