ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
bqknight
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:47 am
Location: Orlando, FL

ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#61 Postby bqknight » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:03 pm

Looks like most models aren't developing this until around 50/51W - that's where it looks like we'll need to start paying attention.

Also - what is the CTCX model? It outperformed every model in intensity and track according to the below. My Googling says it's the experimental US Navy model. I assume that's not public?

http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... /al052019/

Or is there some sort of error in these numbers?
0 likes   

canes92
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Age: 31
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 1:51 pm

ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#62 Postby canes92 » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:08 pm

bqknight wrote:Looks like most models aren't developing this until around 50/51W - that's where it looks like we'll need to start paying attention.

Also - what is the CTCX model? It outperformed every model in intensity and track according to the below. My Googling says it's the experimental US Navy model. I assume that's not public?

http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... /al052019/

Or is there some sort of error in these numbers?


When is it expected to reach 50/51W?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#63 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:24 pm

bqknight wrote:Looks like most models aren't developing this until around 50/51W - that's where it looks like we'll need to start paying attention.

Also - what is the CTCX model? It outperformed every model in intensity and track according to the below. My Googling says it's the experimental US Navy model. I assume that's not public?

http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... /al052019/

Or is there some sort of error in these numbers?



I was able to find out after digging in a little bit. COTC is COAMPS TC that uses the NAVGEM for the initial and boundary conditions while CTCX is COAMPS TC but with GFS for initial and boundary conditions.
2 likes   

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#64 Postby wx98 » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:28 pm

canes92 wrote:
bqknight wrote:Looks like most models aren't developing this until around 50/51W - that's where it looks like we'll need to start paying attention.

Also - what is the CTCX model? It outperformed every model in intensity and track according to the below. My Googling says it's the experimental US Navy model. I assume that's not public?

http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... /al052019/

Or is there some sort of error in these numbers?


When is it expected to reach 50/51W?

According to the latest GFS it should be there Wednesday.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4928
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#65 Postby Nimbus » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:32 pm

SFLcane wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Not impressed this morning looks convectively anemic. Long range gfs has an eastcoast trof parked in place if it try’s to get near the Bahamas.
06z gfs brings it right off miami


Sure at 300+hrs out


06Z GFS has a much weaker system traveling west through the Caribbean then recurving across South Florida. 00Z GFS had a stronger storm turning earlier and going north of Puerto Rico. This time of year we see the Cape Verde storms develop sooner unless there is early shear from a tropical upper tropospheric trough in the mid Atlantic.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#66 Postby NDG » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:39 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:GFS somehow keeps the vorticity intact after it slams Hispaniola...


It doesn't really tracks it over the highest mountains of Hispaniola and systems with strong mid level circulations doesn't take much to redevelop a surface circulation after tracking over Hispaniola, if windshear is not present.
1 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3078
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#67 Postby chris_fit » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:42 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:GFS somehow keeps the vorticity intact after it slams Hispaniola...


Then parks it off the SW FL coast and just weakens it? haaa They should not even run the GFS past 240 hours lol
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15434
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#68 Postby Kingarabian » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:42 pm

12z CMC develops this. 13z UKMET has a weak low by the end of its run.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139060
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#69 Postby cycloneye » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:43 pm

Kingarabian wrote:12z CMC develops this. 13z UKMET has a weak low by the end of its run.


Now let's see if Euro wakes up.
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1768
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#70 Postby kevin » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:53 pm

I'm not saying we can draw a one-to-one comparison, but I do want to note that (if I recall correctly) EURO also struggled a bit with developing Dorian in the beginning. Was that just something that can happen to any model from time to time or is there any known reason that causes EURO to struggle more with systems that haven't actually formed yet?
0 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#71 Postby Highteeld » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

kevin wrote:I'm not saying we can draw a one-to-one comparison, but I do want to note that (if I recall correctly) EURO also struggled a bit with developing Dorian in the beginning. Was that just something that can happen to any model from time to time or is there any known reason that causes EURO to struggle more with systems that haven't actually formed yet?

Took ages for the Euro to latch on. GFS was the big winner (global models) in terms of TC genesis with Dorian
4 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#72 Postby Highteeld » Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:58 pm

Image
0 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#73 Postby Highteeld » Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:01 pm

Image
0 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6771
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#74 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:02 pm

Highteeld wrote:
kevin wrote:I'm not saying we can draw a one-to-one comparison, but I do want to note that (if I recall correctly) EURO also struggled a bit with developing Dorian in the beginning. Was that just something that can happen to any model from time to time or is there any known reason that causes EURO to struggle more with systems that haven't actually formed yet?

Took ages for the Euro to latch on. GFS was the big winner (global models) in terms of TC genesis with Dorian
gfs did better with the track up the coast too, euro was stubborn with a track west
2 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#75 Postby Highteeld » Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:08 pm

0 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#76 Postby AutoPenalti » Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:08 pm

3 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#77 Postby Highteeld » Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:17 pm

0 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf



User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2899
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#80 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:30 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
Highteeld wrote:
kevin wrote:I'm not saying we can draw a one-to-one comparison, but I do want to note that (if I recall correctly) EURO also struggled a bit with developing Dorian in the beginning. Was that just something that can happen to any model from time to time or is there any known reason that causes EURO to struggle more with systems that haven't actually formed yet?

Took ages for the Euro to latch on. GFS was the big winner (global models) in terms of TC genesis with Dorian
gfs did better with the track up the coast too, euro was stubborn with a track west


Overall the ECMWF did better with Dorian on track, absolutely terrible with genesis. ECMWF is actually great with genesis too, such as Fernand and Gabrielle as recent examples, but it's known to struggle with tiny storms out in a very dry, high MSLP environment. Dorian, Isaac, Beryl, Danny, and probably a few others I'm not remembering. ECMWF Ens. support is what we need to watch out for.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests