Hurricane Helene - Cat. 3

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wzrgirl1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1245
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

#861 Postby wzrgirl1 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:41 pm

if you look at the archives andrew was never forecasted to curve out to sea.....derek was correct, but at some point about 5 days out, he was expected to turn north
0 likes   

User avatar
Canelaw99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2112
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Homestead, FL

#862 Postby Canelaw99 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:43 pm

WOW! Strange to read this after all this time knowing what finally happened:

"ZCZC MIAWRKAD4 LOC
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
...FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL USE ONLY...
TROPICAL STORM ANDREW DISCUSSION NUMBER 12
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
5 PM EDT WED AUG 19 1992

POST RECONNAISSANCE SATELLITE PICTURES THIS AFTERNOON HAVE SHOWN ARC
CLOUDS WHICH MAY INDICATE 12 HOURS OR SO OF LITTLE CHANGE IN
STRENGTH. ACTUALLY... THE PULSATING SYSTEM STILL HAS TO GO THROUGH
ONE MORE NIGHT OF SOMEWHAT HOSTILE WINDS ALOFT. IF ANDREW IS NOT
TOO DAMAGED AFTER THAT... THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR STRENGTHENING FOR
THE REMAINDER OF THE FORECAST PERIOD.

THE INITIAL MOTION IS 295/18 KNOTS. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS A
BLEND OF QLM...THE BAM RUNS...AND NHC90. AVN GUIDANCE INDICATES
RIDGING OVER THE EASTERN UNITED STATES AND NORTH OF ANDREW LATE IN
THE PERIOD WITH ANDREW EXPECTED TO BE JUST SOUTH OF THE RIDGE AXIS.
WHILE THIS SCENARIO WOULD TEND TO SUPPORT CONTINUED SLOW WESTWARD
MOTION BEYOND THIS FORECAST...IT IS MUCH TOO EARLY TO SPECULATE
WHETHER ANDREW WILL MAKE LANDFALL...IF AT ALL.


GERRISH"

Guess it proves that NHC is completely human and can only go by what data and knowledge they have, all the while understanding that nature will do whatever it pleases in the end....

Will be interesting to see what Helene has in store over the coming days.
0 likes   

User avatar
Damar91
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: Coral Springs, FL

#863 Postby Damar91 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:46 pm

Canelaw99 wrote:WOW! Strange to read this after all this time knowing what finally happened:

"ZCZC MIAWRKAD4 LOC
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
...FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL USE ONLY...
TROPICAL STORM ANDREW DISCUSSION NUMBER 12
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
5 PM EDT WED AUG 19 1992

POST RECONNAISSANCE SATELLITE PICTURES THIS AFTERNOON HAVE SHOWN ARC
CLOUDS WHICH MAY INDICATE 12 HOURS OR SO OF LITTLE CHANGE IN
STRENGTH. ACTUALLY... THE PULSATING SYSTEM STILL HAS TO GO THROUGH
ONE MORE NIGHT OF SOMEWHAT HOSTILE WINDS ALOFT. IF ANDREW IS NOT
TOO DAMAGED AFTER THAT... THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR STRENGTHENING FOR
THE REMAINDER OF THE FORECAST PERIOD.

THE INITIAL MOTION IS 295/18 KNOTS. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS A
BLEND OF QLM...THE BAM RUNS...AND NHC90. AVN GUIDANCE INDICATES
RIDGING OVER THE EASTERN UNITED STATES AND NORTH OF ANDREW LATE IN
THE PERIOD WITH ANDREW EXPECTED TO BE JUST SOUTH OF THE RIDGE AXIS.
WHILE THIS SCENARIO WOULD TEND TO SUPPORT CONTINUED SLOW WESTWARD
MOTION BEYOND THIS FORECAST...IT IS MUCH TOO EARLY TO SPECULATE
WHETHER ANDREW WILL MAKE LANDFALL...IF AT ALL.


GERRISH"

Guess it proves that NHC is completely human and can only go by what data and knowledge they have, all the while understanding that nature will do whatever it pleases in the end....

Will be interesting to see what Helene has in store over the coming days.


Smartest post I've seen all day.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#864 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:04 pm

Canelaw99 wrote:...FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL USE ONLY...
TROPICAL STORM ANDREW DISCUSSION NUMBER 12
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
5 PM EDT WED AUG 19 1992

.....
THE INITIAL MOTION IS 295/18 KNOTS. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS A
BLEND OF QLM...THE BAM RUNS...AND NHC90.
AVN GUIDANCE INDICATES
RIDGING OVER THE EASTERN UNITED STATES AND NORTH OF ANDREW LATE IN
THE PERIOD WITH ANDREW EXPECTED TO BE JUST SOUTH OF THE RIDGE AXIS.
WHILE THIS SCENARIO WOULD TEND TO SUPPORT CONTINUED SLOW WESTWARD
MOTION BEYOND THIS FORECAST...IT IS MUCH TOO EARLY TO SPECULATE
WHETHER ANDREW WILL MAKE LANDFALL...IF AT ALL.


GERRISH"


Just shows that they had very little model data to look at back then. The BAM models are simple trajectory models that shouldn't be used in the area where Andrew was. The NHC90 model was an old climatology-based model, it only looked at the storm's location and where past storms moved to from that location. The AVN was the only dynamic model they had, and it only went out 48 hours back then, I believe. Looks like the AVN was correct.[/i]
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3873
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: West Melbourne, Florida
Contact:

#865 Postby AJC3 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:07 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Canelaw99 wrote:...FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL USE ONLY...
TROPICAL STORM ANDREW DISCUSSION NUMBER 12
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
5 PM EDT WED AUG 19 1992

.....
THE INITIAL MOTION IS 295/18 KNOTS. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS A
BLEND OF QLM...THE BAM RUNS...AND NHC90.
AVN GUIDANCE INDICATES
RIDGING OVER THE EASTERN UNITED STATES AND NORTH OF ANDREW LATE IN
THE PERIOD WITH ANDREW EXPECTED TO BE JUST SOUTH OF THE RIDGE AXIS.
WHILE THIS SCENARIO WOULD TEND TO SUPPORT CONTINUED SLOW WESTWARD
MOTION BEYOND THIS FORECAST...IT IS MUCH TOO EARLY TO SPECULATE
WHETHER ANDREW WILL MAKE LANDFALL...IF AT ALL.


GERRISH"


Just shows that they had very little model data to look at back then. The BAM models are simple trajectory models that shouldn't be used in the area where Andrew was. The NHC90 model was an old climatology-based model, it only looked at the storm's location and where past storms moved to from that location. The AVN was the only dynamic model they had, and it only went out 48 hours back then, I believe. Looks like the AVN was correct.[/i]


I am drudging up memories of DIFAX sheets hanging up on the wall. I THINK, and don't quote me on this, the old AVN went out to either 60 or 72 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4928
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#866 Postby Nimbus » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:11 pm

Doesn't seem to be any weakness developing near 50w - 60w just the subtropical ridge wedging itself west. Almost over Puerto Rico now?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/natl/loop-wv.html

I really hope some of that cool dry air from up around 30N gets down here in Florida later in the week.
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1709
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

#867 Postby sma10 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:14 pm

wzrgirl1 wrote:if you look at the archives andrew was never forecasted to curve out to sea.....derek was correct, but at some point about 5 days out, he was expected to turn north


And he DID turn north. And then turned west.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#868 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:37 pm

does anyone have a steering currents map?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#869 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:38 pm

AJC3 wrote:I am drudging up memories of DIFAX sheets hanging up on the wall. I THINK, and don't quote me on this, the old AVN went out to either 60 or 72 hours.


I remember that there was only a 500mb chart posted for the 72 and 84-hr periods back then. I think the baroclinic went out to 60 hours, but it wasn't good for tropical.

Yes, I remember the chart walls. Back in the 1980s, we allowed smoking in our office. One of our forecasters set the map wall on fire with a cigarette. Those were the good old days...
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#870 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:44 pm

fact789 wrote:does anyone have a steering currents map?


Here you go, an 18Z GFS projection for early Monday afternoon. Note the deep trof racing into Helene and all the flow away from the east U.S. Coast early next weeek:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/heleneflow.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
Lowpressure
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2032
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

#871 Postby Lowpressure » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:55 pm

The 11 p.m. advisory/ discussion is going to open up a pandoras box on this site for all the westward moving questions.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bgator
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:29 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#872 Postby Bgator » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:55 pm

Given that the
mid-latitude flow across the northern U.S. And the North Atlantic
is forecast by all the models to be fast zonal flow...less
amplification of the trough seems more reasonable...which should
decrease the effect of any northward steering flow on the wast side
of the trough. The result is that the steering flow should weaken
considerably by 96 and 120 hours as mid-level ridging builds slowly
westward to the north of Helene
.



THis is from the 11PM discussion, if mid level ridging build over helene, wouldnt it be forced west?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#873 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:57 pm

Lowpressure wrote:The 11 p.m. advisory/ discussion is going to open up a pandoras box on this site for all the westward moving questions.


Careful what you read into that NHC talk about westward movement. They're not talking about Helene coming west toward the east U.S. Coast, just stalling for a bit between trofs. They're only addressing the 96-120hr period. That's the FIRST trof they're talking about lifting out early next week. It's the second much stronger trof that moves off the east coast toward the middle of next week that'll turn Helene northward. But that's aroun day 6-7 - beyond the NHC forecast period.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 37099
Age: 35
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#874 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:58 pm

wxman57 wrote:
fact789 wrote:does anyone have a steering currents map?


Here you go, an 18Z GFS projection for early Monday afternoon. Note the deep trof racing into Helene and all the flow away from the east U.S. Coast early next weeek:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/heleneflow.gif


She's not going into that wall, that's for sure.
0 likes   
#neversummer

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1709
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

#875 Postby sma10 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:02 pm

Bgator wrote:Given that the
mid-latitude flow across the northern U.S. And the North Atlantic
is forecast by all the models to be fast zonal flow...less
amplification of the trough seems more reasonable...which should
decrease the effect of any northward steering flow on the wast side
of the trough. The result is that the steering flow should weaken
considerably by 96 and 120 hours as mid-level ridging builds slowly
westward to the north of Helene
.



THis is from the 11PM discussion, if mid level ridging build over helene, wouldnt it be forced west?


The answer to your question is right in that paragraph:

"...the steering flow should weaken considerably...."
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 30
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#876 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:06 pm

The track has been shifted southward a bit. Looks like Helene is trying get her shot to be a big hurricane like her Older Brother Gordon.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Derek Ortt

#877 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:14 pm

they also had the GFDL for Andrew, but I believe it was only run once or twice a day and was experimental then
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#878 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:25 pm

What I am sensing here:

-Continue westward, missing the Lesser Antilles just to the north

-Trough comes in and steers Helene between Bermuda and the East Coast, missing land
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3296
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#879 Postby fci » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:48 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Andrew was ALWAYS forecast to turn to the west and intensify. No NHC forecast EVER had it going out to sea


I don't think that was the case with them ALWAYS forecasting the West turn..
They has it going NW and not turning to the west.
Had it all the way up to 28 and 70; not going out to sea but going NW.

Taken from Discussion Archive:
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/storm_w ... /tropdisc/

Discussion 17 had him all the way up to 28N/70W 72 hours out.
Now; subsequent Discussions started moving the 72 hour out forecast further south and west.

By Discussion 22 they started talking Northern Bahamas and the SE US coast.
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1709
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

#880 Postby sma10 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:27 pm

fci wrote:I don't think that was the case with them ALWAYS forecasting the West turn..
They has it going NW and not turning to the west.
Had it all the way up to 28 and 70; not going out to sea but going NW.

Taken from Discussion Archive:
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/storm_w ... /tropdisc/

Discussion 17 had him all the way up to 28N/70W 72 hours out.
Now; subsequent Discussions started moving the 72 hour out forecast further south and west.

By Discussion 22 they started talking Northern Bahamas and the SE US coast.


Absolutely correct, fci.

Simply put, it really was not until Andrew was already under the influence of the high that it was understood how strong the high would be. Admittedly, the track was definitely unusual. Andrew made the turn while at 25.9N and made landfall at 25.4N. It takes quite a ridge to send a hurricane that far west like a bullet while losing a bit of latitude.
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 90 guests