TD GAMMA,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

#121 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:52 pm

Forecaster Colby wrote:I think the center did reform, look at the multispec:

Image


That's what I think too. Possibly a Cat 1 or maybe even 2?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139327
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#122 Postby cycloneye » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:52 pm

Image

The latest forecast track from NHC.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Forecaster Colby

#123 Postby Forecaster Colby » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:56 pm

I doubt it's a cane yet, but since I checked the position in the advisory and it's about half a degree to the southwest...that's awfully darn close.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22484
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#124 Postby wxman57 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:03 pm

Forecaster Colby wrote:I think the center did reform, look at the multispec:


<img src="http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/gamma6.jpg">

Look at the very dark low clouds in the bottom two images. The center is on the south side of the convection, it is not reforming beneath the convection. I believe you're looking at the mid-level circulation center that the NHC mentioned. Southwesterly shear is causing the TS to be tilted to the north. In fact, one could make a case that the center may have been located inland over Honduras earlier this afternoon and is still right on the coast. The bottom two pictures suggest that. I put an "X" where the center could be based on low cloud motions. But it could be a bit farther north near 16.4N where the NHC has it.

The recon plane cearly found 1015mb pressure in the center of those squalls and an LLC on the southern edge by Honduras. It's just a sheared TS. And the new NHC forecast indicates only 5 mph more strengthening, up to 50 mph. There's just too much shear present for much strengthening.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

#125 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:17 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Forecaster Colby wrote:I think the center did reform, look at the multispec:


<img src="http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/gamma6.jpg">

Look at the very dark low clouds in the bottom two images. The center is on the south side of the convection, it is not reforming beneath the convection. In fact, one could make a case that the center may have drifted southwest and is now inland over Honduras. The bottom two pictures suggest that. I put an "X" where the center could be based on low cloud motions. But it could be a bit farther north near 16.4N where the NHC has it.

The recon plane cearly found 1015mb pressure in the center of those squalls and an LLC on the southern edge by Honduras. It's just a sheared TS. And the new NHC forecast indicates only 5 mph more strengthening, up to 50 mph. There's just too much shear present for much strengthening.


Yeah,that may be true, but those images are several images old also. It could be the circulation you labeled with a X is the remnant circ. from 93L also.
0 likes   

Forecaster Colby

#126 Postby Forecaster Colby » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:17 pm

I have absolutely zero faith in NHC intensity forecasting this year. They've been decent about track, but gotten totally steamrollered on intensity.
0 likes   

Rainband

#127 Postby Rainband » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:19 pm

Forecaster Colby wrote:I have absolutely zero faith in NHC intensity forecasting this year. They've been decent about track, but gotten totally steamrollered on intensity.
shear
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22484
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#128 Postby wxman57 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:21 pm

Forecaster Colby wrote:I have absolutely zero faith in NHC intensity forecasting this year. They've been decent about track, but gotten totally steamrollered on intensity.


Well, I agree that intensity forecasting has been pretty bad. However, there's a big difference when a storm is heading into very strong wind shear as compared to a storm in a light shear environment. There's very little chance that Gamma will become a hurricane, and there may not be much left of it by the time it reaches the southern tip of Florida. Not with 70-80 kts of southwest winds aloft and dry air entrainment in the lower levels.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#129 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:21 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:
Yeah,that may be true, but those images are several images old also. It could be the circulation you labeled with a X is the remnant circ. from 93L also.


The multi-sens imagery is from the latest overpass. Those images aren't taken every 30 minutes. It's from a polar orbiter. This one went by only an hour and a half ago.
0 likes   

Forecaster Colby

#130 Postby Forecaster Colby » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:22 pm

Rainband wrote:
Forecaster Colby wrote:I have absolutely zero faith in NHC intensity forecasting this year. They've been decent about track, but gotten totally steamrollered on intensity.
shear


Wilma. Vince. Katrina. Rita.
0 likes   

User avatar
mike815
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1460
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:21 am
Location: palm bay fl

#131 Postby mike815 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:22 pm

This is a sheared piece of crap oh well at least we got another name.
0 likes   

krysof

#132 Postby krysof » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:24 pm

The elongated storm also looks like a hurricane with the shear.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22484
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#133 Postby wxman57 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:26 pm

Forecaster Colby wrote:According to the 3 CST advisory, this is 27. If it were 93L's circulation, it'd be 28.


The convection is remnants of TD 27, the LLC is from 93L. There's absolutely no doubt that the LLC isn't from TD 27. Either way, it would be called Gamma, not 28, as winds are TS force. The two systems merged.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22484
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#134 Postby wxman57 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:29 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:Yeah,that may be true, but those images are several images old also. It could be the circulation you labeled with a X is the remnant circ. from 93L also.


Actually, that "X" IS the circulation of 93L. It could clearly be tracked moving northward along the coast of Nicaragua yesterday then NW across eastern Honduras early this morning. However, it is now the center of TS Gamma.
0 likes   

User avatar
windycity
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: P.B.county,Fl.
Contact:

#135 Postby windycity » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:30 pm

i think NHC has done a great job of forecasting this year,on both track and intensity. lets all give em a BIG thanks for all they do. after all, we need their input ! i have learned so much since last year and i am grateful to have found storm2k. now down to praying about gamma.PLEASE GOD! MAKE IT GO AWAY!!!!
0 likes   

Forecaster Colby

#136 Postby Forecaster Colby » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:31 pm

The First Gamma Advisory wrote:...TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWENTY-SEVEN RE-GENERATES...BECOMES TROPICAL
STORM GAMMA...
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#137 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:32 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Forecaster Colby wrote:According to the 3 CST advisory, this is 27. If it were 93L's circulation, it'd be 28.


The convection is remnants of TD 27, the LLC is from 93L. There's absolutely no doubt that the LLC isn't from TD 27. Either way, it would be called Gamma, not 28, as winds are TS force. The two systems merged.


Well...they are saying it is from the LLC of TD 27...hence the reason we are on advisory number 13 already. It really is a combo of the two pieces of energy...93L+TD27. And if you really get technical...there was a whole lot more of 93L that went into this than there was TD27.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22484
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#138 Postby wxman57 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:32 pm

Forecaster Colby wrote:
The First Gamma Advisory wrote:...TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWENTY-SEVEN RE-GENERATES...BECOMES TROPICAL
STORM GAMMA...


Right, because they wanted to avoid confusion of saying that this was a merger of an LLC from 93L and convection from TD 27.
0 likes   

User avatar
mike815
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1460
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:21 am
Location: palm bay fl

#139 Postby mike815 » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:34 pm

Yeah they dont want to confuse people.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3296
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#140 Postby fci » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:34 pm

Note how the track is evolving further South each time (I know there have only been 2 advisories but it is further south than the last one).
Models seem to take it further south too.

Keeps going we will see it go through the Straits and miss the peninsula entirely?
0 likes   


Return to “2005”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests