ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#7481 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:28 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139011
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE / Obs / Preparations / Web Cams / Texas / Mex Coast

#7482 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:29 am

If anyone in Texas has closures of schools,evacuations etc,post them here.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7483 Postby Sanibel » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:30 am

I'm sorry, but what does that mean? Thanks!



A trough is like a cold front that creates a lower resistance path in the weather pattern. There's a trough coming in from the Pacific NW that could put that path in front of Ike near the Texas coast. But it looks like it will arrive too late to really turn Ike north (which is why NHC has their track where they have it). My total amateur guess would be that it could shift the landfall further north by a few miles but probably not by any major margin. Ike has defied all north moves so far.
Last edited by Sanibel on Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

smw1981
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Alabamer

#7484 Postby smw1981 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:30 am

I agree, if they are going to have mandatory evacs, they need to go ahead and do it really, really soon. Especially if Texas is supposed to begin feeling TS conditions Friday! You don't want hundreds of thousands (possibly even millions) of people stuck on the interstate in TS conditions!

At the same time, I can see why they are waiting as long as possible to make the call after the Gustav evacs. I still think they should make a decision and stick with it (kind of like a now or never type thing). (I realize this is much easier said than done!) :D
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7485 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:31 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:I still smell a Louisiana storm.


They aren't in the cone...though I suppose if the track shifts north they may be back in again at some point but we shall see. Problem is the models are shifting north but at this stage the shifts won't be too extreme and therefore any shift north will only heighten the risk for the more densely populated regions.

Indeed at the moment with hurricane froce winds expanding quite far thanks to the outer eyewlal if that presentation doesn't change too much before landfall this will have a wide effect to Texas coast, esp as that region will be in the NE quad.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

Re:

#7486 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:31 am

HURAKAN wrote:Image


It looks like the dry air just cant get out of that styorm, hopefully this will keep it from getting strong fast.
0 likes   

inda_iwall

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7487 Postby inda_iwall » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:32 am

Evac3 wrote:It's starting to worry me (like some of you have said) that evacuations haven't been called yet here in SETX or in Galveston. I KNOW that if we (Southeast Texas) would not have had an evacuation last week, they would have already called it. They didn't hesitate to call the one for Gustav. As for now, it would seem if they do call for one, it would be for tomorrow morning, which wouldn't give everybody in Galveston, Houston, SETX, and SWLA enough time to all get out at once (unless it slows more.) And yes, you'd think we could just make our own personal decision to leave without being told to do so, but there are so many employers who threaten to fire any employee who leaves before mandatory is called. They are gambling with people's lives. Yes, it's very costly and it is definitely hard on those poor special needs people who, for some, don't have a choice in the matter... but as far as the general public is concerned, they can call for a mandatory so employees can leave if they need to... if they choose to stay, they can still choose to. They need to go ahead and call one asap to free those that want to leave. We all saw and will never forget what happened with Rita.

On another note, I've passed at least six houses here the past few days where they were cutting the rest of their trees down from around the house (the few actually left after Rita). There are no lines at the gas stations and people are just going about their dailies.

And... is this slowing still going to make a more upper Texas landfall possible? Or has something changed?



If anything you just proved my point, that we always need to be on guard and open to possibilities, everyone gets so locked in on models and pro mets and maps, that sometimes things change and have their own minds when it comes to mother nature. I am in no way "BASHING", just questioning, I think sometimes scientists get so locked into analyzing data objectively, they lose sight that this is mother nature. Things can change, we can not predict everything. I am just striking back I guess because I am going against the mainstream thought, and I wanted to defend myself. I also think the dry air is going to inhibit RI, or any intensification past a cat 2, and I am sure you will slam me for that.

I have no problem coming back here and admitting I am wrong, I have been happily married for a while so doing that is nothing new to me in the least bit.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 64
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7488 Postby Sabanic » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:32 am

Stormcenter wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:
PTrackerLA wrote:I'm having a tough time finding the center, but if anything it looks like it has gone a good deal north of the forecast path. These could simply be wobbles similar to what the NHC is saying. Basically, I see a SLOW NW movement that's north of the forecast path, but I could be wrong since we don't have a cleared out eye.



I still smell a Louisiana storm.


Note- I am an amateur olfacotrist, and my nose is not endorsed by Storm2K.

I'm taking precautions on the better safe than sorry theory, and anyone ordered to evacuate would be stupid not to, but I smell Louisiana.


Unfortunately I smell a Texas storm big time.


Just hoping the SW/LA folks have an eye on Ike. Any landfall in the upper TX coast would definitely put them in the worst part of Ike.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#7489 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:32 am

Steve wrote:>>its consolidating.....if it doesnt correct then this could have implication further north...

How much further north, like due SE of Pearland? :?:

;)

Steve



Oh brother :roll: , you know me better than that...Steve...north meaning all the way to SWLA if that makes you happy...geezz......
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#7490 Postby CronkPSU » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:33 am

i have no idea what Ike is doing...sure looks to be struggling again, recon can't get back in there fast enough
0 likes   

User avatar
Texas Snowman
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 6011
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Denison, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7491 Postby Texas Snowman » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:34 am

KWT,

I read on another forum that Katrina took a while to sort things out and expand hurricane force winds outwards from the center, and then of course, bombed from a 2 to a 5 very shortly. As I remember, that's basically what happened.

I don't think that type of intensification is out of the realm of possibility with Ike (I think it will strengthen to Cat 4 status at some point, Cat 5, I don't know) but I think it will take much of today to get organized.

I would think that things will really start to ramp up later today, tonight, and tomorrow.

Overall, I still "smell" (and my olfactory forecasting senses are just as unofficial as Ed's are) a Carla-esque storm impacting Texas with a LF somewhere between Port O'Connor and Freeport, possibly even just a hair to the east of Freeport.
0 likes   

User avatar
BayouVenteux
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 775
Age: 62
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:26 pm
Location: Ascension Parish, Louisiana (30.3 N 91.0 W)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7492 Postby BayouVenteux » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:35 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:
PTrackerLA wrote:I'm having a tough time finding the center, but if anything it looks like it has gone a good deal north of the forecast path. These could simply be wobbles similar to what the NHC is saying. Basically, I see a SLOW NW movement that's north of the forecast path, but I could be wrong since we don't have a cleared out eye.



I still smell a Louisiana storm.


Note- I am an amateur olfacotrist, and my nose is not endorsed by Storm2K.

I'm taking precautions on the better safe than sorry theory, and anyone ordered to evacuate would be stupid not to, but I smell Louisiana.


Sorry Ed, but what you're smelling is all the post-Gustav storm debris and tossed-out food from a week-plus without power in many places here. :wink: Unfortunately, this is looking more solidly by the hour like a very big, very ugly Lone Star State storm. I know too well what many of you are about to go through and to put it bluntly, it sucks. My thoughts and prayers will be with y'all in the days ahead.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#7493 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:37 am

The problem is that dry air is classic moating there, it seems right now it has major structual issues, until it sorts itself out in that way Ike won't get much stronger then it is now.
0 likes   

Evac3
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Orange County, Southeast Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7494 Postby Evac3 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:37 am

inda_iwall wrote:
Evac3 wrote:It's starting to worry me (like some of you have said) that evacuations haven't been called yet here in SETX or in Galveston. I KNOW that if we (Southeast Texas) would not have had an evacuation last week, they would have already called it. They didn't hesitate to call the one for Gustav. As for now, it would seem if they do call for one, it would be for tomorrow morning, which wouldn't give everybody in Galveston, Houston, SETX, and SWLA enough time to all get out at once (unless it slows more.) And yes, you'd think we could just make our own personal decision to leave without being told to do so, but there are so many employers who threaten to fire any employee who leaves before mandatory is called. They are gambling with people's lives. Yes, it's very costly and it is definitely hard on those poor special needs people who, for some, don't have a choice in the matter... but as far as the general public is concerned, they can call for a mandatory so employees can leave if they need to... if they choose to stay, they can still choose to. They need to go ahead and call one asap to free those that want to leave. We all saw and will never forget what happened with Rita.

On another note, I've passed at least six houses here the past few days where they were cutting the rest of their trees down from around the house (the few actually left after Rita). There are no lines at the gas stations and people are just going about their dailies.

And... is this slowing still going to make a more upper Texas landfall possible? Or has something changed?



If anything you just proved my point, that we always need to be on guard and open to possibilities, everyone gets so locked in on models and pro mets and maps, that sometimes things change and have their own minds when it comes to mother nature. I am in no way "BASHING", just questioning, I think sometimes scientists get so locked into analyzing data objectively, they lose sight that this is mother nature. Things can change, we can not predict everything. I am just striking back I guess because I am going against the mainstream thought, and I wanted to defend myself. I also think the dry air is going to inhibit RI, or any intensification past a cat 2, and I am sure you will slam me for that.

I have no problem coming back here and admitting I am wrong, I have been happily married for a while so doing that is nothing new to me in the least bit.


I don't understand what you're trying to say.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7495 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:38 am

BayouVenteux wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:
PTrackerLA wrote:I'm having a tough time finding the center, but if anything it looks like it has gone a good deal north of the forecast path. These could simply be wobbles similar to what the NHC is saying. Basically, I see a SLOW NW movement that's north of the forecast path, but I could be wrong since we don't have a cleared out eye.



I still smell a Louisiana storm.


Note- I am an amateur olfacotrist, and my nose is not endorsed by Storm2K.

I'm taking precautions on the better safe than sorry theory, and anyone ordered to evacuate would be stupid not to, but I smell Louisiana.


Sorry Ed, but what you're smelling is all the post-Gustav storm debris and tossed-out food from a week-plus without power in many places here. :wink: Unfortunately, this is looking more solidly by the hour like a very big, very ugly Lone Star State storm. I know too well what many of you are about to go through and to put it bluntly, it sucks. My thoughts and prayers will be with y'all in the days ahead.



Over on model thread, 12Z GFS trended even farther North (still South of Houston), but pro-met AFM said 12Z GFS still initialized a little too weak and slow with Western trough, so I don't think anywhere West of about Cocodrie, where I once came back from two weeks offshore to a flat tire on a Sunday, is safe from the storm, especially if tropical storm force winds and some surge indeed come almost 200 miles East of the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re:

#7496 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:39 am

dwg71 wrote:http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/loops/wxloop.cgi?wv_east_enhanced+12

I dont know what to make of this loop, it appears overall structure is not doing so well at the end and I cant find a center to save my arse..

It appears whole system is drifting NE, not possible is it??


I can agree with that...drifting\3 mph north or so....the whole system looks that way...not just something rotating with in something.
0 likes   

User avatar
SMNederlandTX
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 57
Age: 49
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Nederland, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#7497 Postby SMNederlandTX » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:39 am

This may have been asked before by someone, so I apologize in advance if it has.

When will someone know for sure where it is going to make landfall? I live in SETX and do not want to have to evacuate at the last minute. Been there, done that, don't want to do it again.

Thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#7498 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:40 am

The other thing to note is convection does seem to have warmed a little bit recently.

How long these structual issues will last I'm not sure but I suspect we are looking at 12hrs at least, going to take a while to ramp up, that probably won't make much of a difference though in terms of how strong Ike can become down the road.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Re:

#7499 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:40 am

deltadog03 wrote:
dwg71 wrote:http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/loops/wxloop.cgi?wv_east_enhanced+12

I dont know what to make of this loop, it appears overall structure is not doing so well at the end and I cant find a center to save my arse..

It appears whole system is drifting NE, not possible is it??


I can agree with that...drifting\3 mph north or so....the whole system looks that way...not just something rotating with in something.



Just between you and me, unofficially, honest opinion, off the record, this can still completely miss Texas, and landfall in Western or Central Louisiana, no?
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#7500 Postby dwg71 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:41 am

http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/ ... nhanced+12

Im sure it wont last, though I hope, but it looks like crap right about now compared to 4 hours ago. No recon, but pressure has surely risen. Maybe pressure adjusted to match winds, instead of the opposite.
Just amateur speculation. I would estimate its no more than a 70Kt storm in its current state, and that might be generous.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests