ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#761 Postby NDG » Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:33 am

Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#762 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:42 am

new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua

Very unlikely that this affects TX
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#763 Postby NDG » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:44 am

Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua

Very unlikely that this affects TX


There goes the GFS once again with shifting the energy from the Caribbean to the EPAC, how many times has it done that with previous runs & systems and has failed. I got to the point to where I do not trust the GFS past its 72 hr forecast. Just my opinion.
1 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#764 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:46 am

making a WNW turn. However, it is weaker than 6Z
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#765 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:47 am

Alyono wrote:making a WNW turn. However, it is weaker than 6Z

This run it has a better vorticity signature so far but I can't trust this run because it develops a strong vorticy in the Epac it's likely convective feedback issues
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#766 Postby perk » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:47 am

Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua

Very unlikely that this affects TX


I'm surprised that more than 5 days out you can make this claim.
1 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#767 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:53 am

This run is more north east
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#768 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:53 am

perk wrote:
Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua

Very unlikely that this affects TX


I'm surprised that more than 5 days out you can make this claim.


going by some objective probabilities I have calculated from ensembles

The only place right now with more than a remote chance of an impact along the TX coast is Brownsville
Last edited by Alyono on Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5674
Age: 58
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#769 Postby Tireman4 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:54 am

perk wrote:
Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua

Very unlikely that this affects TX


I'm surprised that more than 5 days out you can make this claim.



This could be sarcasm...:)
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#770 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:59 am

this GFS run should be farther to the north given that it is indicating a slower motion
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#771 Postby NDG » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:59 am

One more time, just how the GFS was forecasting a strong mid level ridge across the NW GOM which surely would had buried Harvey into C.A.
Keeps trending towards a big weakness in the NW GOM.

Image
1 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#772 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:01 am

Alyono wrote:this GFS run should be farther to the north given that it is indicating a slower motion

I agree 100% I respect your opinion and I'll give it a 50/50 chance of pulling north thanks again for your thoughts
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#773 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:02 am

NDG wrote:One more time, just how the GFS was forecasting a strong mid level ridge across the NW GOM which surely would had buried Harvey into C.A.
Keeps trending towards a big weakness in the NW GOM.

Image

Yeah I noticed this and it's kinda concerning but this model is downright terrible it's been shifting alot even 72 hours out !
0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3073
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#774 Postby SoupBone » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:07 am

Thetxhurricanemaster wrote:
NDG wrote:One more time, just how the GFS was forecasting a strong mid level ridge across the NW GOM which surely would had buried Harvey into C.A.
Keeps trending towards a big weakness in the NW GOM.

Yeah I noticed this and it's kinda concerning but this model is downright terrible it's been shifting alot even 72 hours out !


You keep saying this without acknowledging that they have all been all over the place with little to no consistency. There is no trend whatsoever with any of them.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#775 Postby Frank P » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:09 am

Well as many models that are run on these systems, eventually one might accidently get a 5 to 7 day forecast right... there is always hope for them! :flag: :roll:
2 likes   

TexasBreeze
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:50 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#776 Postby TexasBreeze » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:13 am

This thing is barely even named right now. If it opens to a wave, then a Central America track it will be...
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#777 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:16 am

GFS goes slower, Canadian faster.
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#778 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:18 am

TexasBreeze wrote:This thing is barely even named right now. If it opens to a wave, then a Central America track it will be...

That isn't a valid statement but I'll leave it be
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#779 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:20 am

Canadian appears buried in the BOC. Still no trend on the models. Ping ponging continues
2 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#780 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:21 am

Alyono wrote:Canadian appears buried in the BOC. Still no trend on the models. Ping ponging continues

This pattern is extremely complex so I understand why models are flip flopping but what makes it worse is you can't trust most of these models past 48 hours
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests