ATL: HARVEY - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua
Very unlikely that this affects TX
Very unlikely that this affects TX
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua
Very unlikely that this affects TX
There goes the GFS once again with shifting the energy from the Caribbean to the EPAC, how many times has it done that with previous runs & systems and has failed. I got to the point to where I do not trust the GFS past its 72 hr forecast. Just my opinion.
1 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 279
- Age: 33
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
- Location: Corpus christi
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:making a WNW turn. However, it is weaker than 6Z
This run it has a better vorticity signature so far but I can't trust this run because it develops a strong vorticy in the Epac it's likely convective feedback issues
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua
Very unlikely that this affects TX
I'm surprised that more than 5 days out you can make this claim.
1 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 279
- Age: 33
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
- Location: Corpus christi
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
perk wrote:Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua
Very unlikely that this affects TX
I'm surprised that more than 5 days out you can make this claim.
going by some objective probabilities I have calculated from ensembles
The only place right now with more than a remote chance of an impact along the TX coast is Brownsville
Last edited by Alyono on Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Tireman4
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5674
- Age: 58
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
- Location: Humble, Texas
- Contact:
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
perk wrote:Alyono wrote:new GFS has shifted south into Nicaragua
Very unlikely that this affects TX
I'm surprised that more than 5 days out you can make this claim.
This could be sarcasm...
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
this GFS run should be farther to the north given that it is indicating a slower motion
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
One more time, just how the GFS was forecasting a strong mid level ridge across the NW GOM which surely would had buried Harvey into C.A.
Keeps trending towards a big weakness in the NW GOM.
Keeps trending towards a big weakness in the NW GOM.
1 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 279
- Age: 33
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
- Location: Corpus christi
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:this GFS run should be farther to the north given that it is indicating a slower motion
I agree 100% I respect your opinion and I'll give it a 50/50 chance of pulling north thanks again for your thoughts
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 279
- Age: 33
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
- Location: Corpus christi
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
NDG wrote:One more time, just how the GFS was forecasting a strong mid level ridge across the NW GOM which surely would had buried Harvey into C.A.
Keeps trending towards a big weakness in the NW GOM.
Yeah I noticed this and it's kinda concerning but this model is downright terrible it's been shifting alot even 72 hours out !
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Thetxhurricanemaster wrote:NDG wrote:One more time, just how the GFS was forecasting a strong mid level ridge across the NW GOM which surely would had buried Harvey into C.A.
Keeps trending towards a big weakness in the NW GOM.
Yeah I noticed this and it's kinda concerning but this model is downright terrible it's been shifting alot even 72 hours out !
You keep saying this without acknowledging that they have all been all over the place with little to no consistency. There is no trend whatsoever with any of them.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Well as many models that are run on these systems, eventually one might accidently get a 5 to 7 day forecast right... there is always hope for them!
2 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:50 pm
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
This thing is barely even named right now. If it opens to a wave, then a Central America track it will be...
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 279
- Age: 33
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
- Location: Corpus christi
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
TexasBreeze wrote:This thing is barely even named right now. If it opens to a wave, then a Central America track it will be...
That isn't a valid statement but I'll leave it be
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Canadian appears buried in the BOC. Still no trend on the models. Ping ponging continues
2 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 279
- Age: 33
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
- Location: Corpus christi
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:Canadian appears buried in the BOC. Still no trend on the models. Ping ponging continues
This pattern is extremely complex so I understand why models are flip flopping but what makes it worse is you can't trust most of these models past 48 hours
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests