ATL: TEN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
storm4u
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:26 am
Location: agawam, ma
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#681 Postby storm4u » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:05 pm

18z gfs developed it off the east coast

TheStormExpert wrote:
blp wrote:Lots of similarities with Gert. Take a look at what was said back when 99l pre Gert was in the same area with no model support from Euro or GFS.

Page 60
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=118925&start=1180

But model support was on and off whereas with 92L the GFS and Euro haven't shown development in days!
0 likes   

User avatar
BeRad954
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 17
Age: 34
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:19 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#682 Postby BeRad954 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:06 pm

Miami Storm Tracker wrote:anyone else having issues with the floater for 92L

Try the GOES 16 SLIDER site, awesome addition!
http://rammb-slider.cira.colostate.edu/ ... mmb-slider
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. Please refer to the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

User avatar
Miami Storm Tracker
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Key Largo, Fla.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#683 Postby Miami Storm Tracker » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:08 pm

at least a decent amount of convection firing the evening.
1 likes   

WeatherHoon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:12 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#684 Postby WeatherHoon » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:31 pm

I'm really not sure what to think at this moment. If 92L does somehow make it and develop, I can't imagine it being anything more than a weak tropical storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7280
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#685 Postby Hurricaneman » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:07 pm

Looks like it's consolidating near the 850 vortex and may be trying to form some kind of surface reflection there too, it's also in a low shear environment with the ULL moving to its north not at it but in tandem which could keep the shear low until Florida if that continues so those that are writing this off might be surprised by Monday or sooner
3 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7280
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#686 Postby Hurricaneman » Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:43 pm

With model support I predict the chances go up to 30% for 2 days and 50% for 5 days
1 likes   

hd44
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 11:11 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#687 Postby hd44 » Sun Aug 20, 2017 12:10 am

Firing popcorn convection and shear seems low. This can lower the pressures and it is a process that could lead to development.
0 likes   

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1805
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#688 Postby AtlanticWind » Sun Aug 20, 2017 12:26 am

Hurricaneman wrote:With model support I predict the chances go up to 30% for 2 days and 50% for 5 days

Nope at 10/20
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#689 Postby AutoPenalti » Sun Aug 20, 2017 12:27 am

It has 500-600 miles to consolidate and intensify, plenty of time.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

stormreader
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1242
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:58 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#690 Postby stormreader » Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:21 am

Hurricaneman wrote:Looks like it's consolidating near the 850 vortex and may be trying to form some kind of surface reflection there too, it's also in a low shear environment with the ULL moving to its north not at it but in tandem which could keep the shear low until Florida if that continues so those that are writing this off might be surprised by Monday or sooner

The wave does look very healthy tonight! Looking at sat, seems like it's trying to develop a center further south than model runs initialize. Don't know if that's what you mean when you say the 850 mb area. Anyway, if it's does organize near the south end of convection, I don't know if that would have an impact on a possible S Fl landfall. But I like the way it looks tonight. Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SuperMarioBros99thx
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 192
Age: 22
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:38 am
Location: Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#691 Postby SuperMarioBros99thx » Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:31 am

stormreader wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:Looks like it's consolidating near the 850 vortex and may be trying to form some kind of surface reflection there too, it's also in a low shear environment with the ULL moving to its north not at it but in tandem which could keep the shear low until Florida if that continues so those that are writing this off might be surprised by Monday or sooner

The wave does look very healthy tonight! Looking at sat, seems like it's trying to develop a center further south than model runs initialize. Don't know if that's what you mean when you say the 850 mb area. Anyway, if it's does organize near the south end of convection, I don't know if that would have an impact on a possible S Fl landfall. But I like the way it looks tonight. Image

It seems 92L seems to face what Gert has happened before: competing south and north vorticities.
2 likes   
My opinions are mine and SHOULD not be treated as an official source of information. PLEASE see National Hurricane Center, or any other meteorological agencies, for that matter. By the way, I was born and came from Indonesia, which is rarely hit by tropical cyclones, but regardless, I have LOTS of interest in meteorology.

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4928
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#692 Postby Nimbus » Sun Aug 20, 2017 5:36 am

The second ULL is starting to fill in so it looks like another Gert scenario.
Track is closer to Florida this time and maybe a little slower so might have a chance at becoming a hurricane before the north turn.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10787
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#693 Postby GCANE » Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:11 am

Another GFS fail.
It was supposed to get wiped by the 355K PV streamer at this position.
NOT.
Now its on the SW side of the ULL - classic position for development.
Convection firing off.
However, some mid-level dry air to the west it needs to shake off.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10787
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#694 Postby GCANE » Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:15 am

Looks like a hot tower fired off near DMAX very close to the CoC.
Leaving a large area of cirrus in its wake.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6771
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#695 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:16 am

GCANE wrote:Another GFS fail.
It was supposed to get wiped by the 355K PV streamer at this position.
NOT.
Now its on the SW side of the ULL - classic position for development.
Convection firing off.
However, some mid-level dry air to the west it needs to shake off.

im hugging nhc probabilities in the next few two's regardless of what models show either way
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139025
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#696 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:42 am

8 AM TWO:

A trough of low pressure located a couple of hundred miles north of
Puerto Rico continues to produce disorganized showers and
thunderstorms. Environmental conditions are expected to be
unfavorable for development of this system during the next couple of
days, but they could become slightly more conducive for development
by midweek when the system is near the northwestern Bahamas or
Florida.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...10 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...20 percent.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#697 Postby ronjon » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:04 am

NHC probs look a little low considering the heavy convection and apparent circulation on the north side of the wave. Shear looks to have decreased too.
2 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1343
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#698 Postby Emmett_Brown » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:05 am

Convection looking slightly more consolidated. First couple of frames of Vis satellite show perhaps a weak LLC near 22.2N, 67.1W?
2 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6771
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#699 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:15 am

ronjon wrote:NHC probs look a little low considering the heavy convection and apparent circulation on the north side of the wave. Shear looks to have decreased too.


seems a little low considering its hanging tough and conditions appear to be improving over time..guess they are banking on this thing weakening to the point that it well be weakened to the point it cant take advantage of better conditions ahead
2 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#700 Postby xironman » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:27 am

ronjon wrote:NHC probs look a little low considering the heavy convection and apparent circulation on the north side of the wave. Shear looks to have decreased too.


Yup

Image
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests