ATL: CRISTOBAL - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 119000
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

ATL: CRISTOBAL - Post-Tropical - Discussion

#1 Postby cycloneye » Sun May 31, 2020 8:54 am

Post away about the new invest.
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7261
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#2 Postby GCANE » Sun May 31, 2020 9:55 am

I estimate the mid-level vort about here

Image
1 likes   

GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7261
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#3 Postby GCANE » Sun May 31, 2020 9:59 am

Given the convection already firing in the BoC, the dry line, the shear gradient, and pressure about to turn south; this could come soon.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 18871
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#4 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun May 31, 2020 10:31 am

GCANE wrote:Given the convection already firing in the BoC, the dry line, the shear gradient, and pressure about to turn south; this could come soon.



The convection in the BOC has continued to keep the pressure slightly lower then the surrounding environment that is what will help pull the main vorticity with Amanda that direction. otherwise like previous solutions it could have continued NE into the NW carrib. which cant be ruled out yet.

All I can say is... this is going to be an interesting couple days to see how the LLC reacts.

The 00z Euro was particularly interesting lol

But nothing beats this mornings 6z GFS.. I mean really ??? lol
1 likes   
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 18871
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#5 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun May 31, 2020 10:46 am

all the HWRF, HMON, EURO , and GFS 12z all have amanda get into the BOC in 30 hours via either moving directly or some sort of reformation.

that circ appears to stay relatively intact and closed as it moves into the BOC. so maybe straight to TS ???
1 likes   
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

stormlover2013
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2027
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:06 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#6 Postby stormlover2013 » Sun May 31, 2020 10:54 am

Icon shows strong hurricane saw la/ upper tx
2 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 18871
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#7 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun May 31, 2020 11:03 am

Where are all the Texas and LA people ?? should be buzzing in there already lol ..
6 likes   
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Cpv17
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2056
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: Wharton/El Campo

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#8 Postby Cpv17 » Sun May 31, 2020 11:05 am

I’m here in southeast Texas (just sw of Houston) but this looks to be more of a Louisiana storm right now.
1 likes   

User avatar
TexWx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#9 Postby TexWx » Sun May 31, 2020 11:07 am

Here.
1 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4998
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#10 Postby PTrackerLA » Sun May 31, 2020 11:15 am

Aric Dunn wrote:Where are all the Texas and LA people ?? should be buzzing in there already lol ..


Oh I'm tuned in now. Not everyday you see such strong model agreement and aggressive Euro ensembles for a system in the gulf...even during peak month. Going to be a very interesting week around here.
2 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3309
Age: 59
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#11 Postby chaser1 » Sun May 31, 2020 11:22 am

GCANE wrote:I estimate the mid-level vort about here

https://i.imgur.com/GMznqAR.png


Yep, I'd guess the broader mid level circulation to be right about (or slightly east of) there. So yeah.... as you and Aric are implying if Amanda's LLC filled quickly, along with already low pressures and continued convection popping in the Bay of Campeche, then we'd more likely be talking about a quicker "reformation" in the BOC/GOM because essentially we'd be talking about the broader envelope of the primary gyre itself consolidating and developing there. That would likely be a quicker process then the GFS solution where essentially a new lobe of energy (or remnant low from Angela) were to have to slowly start from scratch in the BOC. That latter solution also would imply a less initial robust process given the possibly added deterrent of fighting for low level convergence if another Pacific side LLC were to also attempt to develop at the same time. Seems to me that the EURO best depicts a reasonable depiction of this broad complex gyre and the timing that would necessitate to eventually organize in the BOC. In a way, the EURO isn't really quite as fast as the NAVGEM or CMC suggests organization will occur. One very interesting note here, notice how the UK has ZERO development in the GOM from this event. That would be something worth noting should no development on the Atlantic side occur from this.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.



User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6562
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#12 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun May 31, 2020 11:26 am

Hoping there isn’t another Audrey type But more An 1989 Jerry or less system here, but can’t ignore the trends in the models and also Seems to be coming together quicker than expected
0 likes   

User avatar
Siker
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 884
Age: 23
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA / Williamstown, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#13 Postby Siker » Sun May 31, 2020 11:29 am

chaser1 wrote:
GCANE wrote:I estimate the mid-level vort about here

https://i.imgur.com/GMznqAR.png


Yep, I'd guess the broader mid level circulation to be right about (or slightly east of) there. So yeah.... as you and Aric are implying if Amanda's LLC filled quickly, along with already low pressures and continued convection popping in the Bay of Campeche, then we'd more likely be talking about a quicker "reformation" in the BOC/GOM because essentially we'd be talking about the broader envelope of the primary gyre itself consolidating and developing there. That would likely be a quicker process then the GFS solution where essentially a new lobe of energy (or remnant low from Angela) were to have to slowly start from scratch in the BOC. That latter solution also would imply a less initial robust process given the possibly added deterrent of fighting for low level convergence if another Pacific side LLC were to also attempt to develop at the same time. Seems to me that the EURO best depicts a reasonable depiction of this broad complex gyre and the timing that would necessitate to eventually organize in the BOC. In a way, the EURO isn't really quite as fast as the NAVGEM or CMC suggests organization will occur. One very interesting note here, notice how the UK has ZERO development in the GOM from this event. That would be something worth noting should no development on the Atlantic side occur from this.


To clarify, are you excluding the BoC when you say the UK doesn’t develop in the GoM? 12z UKMET develops in BoC and sends low slowly ESE into Yucatán vicinity:

NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 48 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+ 48 : 19.3N 93.8W

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 02.06.2020 48 19.3N 93.8W 1004 34
0000UTC 03.06.2020 60 18.2N 93.2W 1002 31
1200UTC 03.06.2020 72 18.8N 92.0W 1003 32
0000UTC 04.06.2020 84 18.8N 92.1W 1000 31
1200UTC 04.06.2020 96 18.5N 92.3W 1001 29
0000UTC 05.06.2020 108 CEASED TRACKING
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 18871
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#14 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun May 31, 2020 11:29 am

chaser1 wrote:
GCANE wrote:I estimate the mid-level vort about here

https://i.imgur.com/GMznqAR.png


Yep, I'd guess the broader mid level circulation to be right about (or slightly east of) there. So yeah.... as you and Aric are implying if Amanda's LLC filled quickly, along with already low pressures and continued convection popping in the Bay of Campeche, then we'd more likely be talking about a quicker "reformation" in the BOC/GOM because essentially we'd be talking about the broader envelope of the primary gyre itself consolidating and developing there. That would likely be a quicker process then the GFS solution where essentially a new lobe of energy (or remnant low from Angela) were to have to slowly start from scratch in the BOC. That latter solution also would imply a less initial robust process given the possibly added deterrent of fighting for low level convergence if another Pacific side LLC were to also attempt to develop at the same time. Seems to me that the EURO best depicts a reasonable depiction of this broad complex gyre and the timing that would necessitate to eventually organize in the BOC. In a way, the EURO isn't really quite as fast as the NAVGEM or CMC suggests organization will occur. One very interesting note here, notice how the UK has ZERO development in the GOM from this event. That would be something worth noting should no development on the Atlantic side occur from this.


Yeah, and the longer it festers or moves slowly the better shot it has at becoming a hurricane as you can see from the ensemble members.

also the UKMET has development in BOC then moves back over land then starts to organize off the tip of the Yucatan Peninsula.

Image
0 likes   
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3309
Age: 59
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#15 Postby chaser1 » Sun May 31, 2020 11:32 am

Cpv17 wrote:I’m here in southeast Texas (just sw of Houston) but this looks to be more of a Louisiana storm right now.


Perhaps, though looking at the projected mid level heights over the Southeast U.S. and northern GOM I'd put my .50 bet for "ground zero" landfall occurring between Galveston and Corpus Christi. If this system were to truly deepen to a strong T.S. or minimal hurricane, then it's track would more likely be impacted by the mid levels rather then the southerly low level trades. As I see it this would imply a more N.W. track then a northerly one.
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.



stormlover2013
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2027
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:06 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#16 Postby stormlover2013 » Sun May 31, 2020 11:40 am

Yeah ur right chase I say corpus to sw la with how upper level looks
Last edited by stormlover2013 on Sun May 31, 2020 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3309
Age: 59
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#17 Postby chaser1 » Sun May 31, 2020 11:41 am

Siker wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
GCANE wrote:I estimate the mid-level vort about here

https://i.imgur.com/GMznqAR.png


Yep, I'd guess the broader mid level circulation to be right about (or slightly east of) there. So yeah.... as you and Aric are implying if Amanda's LLC filled quickly, along with already low pressures and continued convection popping in the Bay of Campeche, then we'd more likely be talking about a quicker "reformation" in the BOC/GOM because essentially we'd be talking about the broader envelope of the primary gyre itself consolidating and developing there. That would likely be a quicker process then the GFS solution where essentially a new lobe of energy (or remnant low from Angela) were to have to slowly start from scratch in the BOC. That latter solution also would imply a less initial robust process given the possibly added deterrent of fighting for low level convergence if another Pacific side LLC were to also attempt to develop at the same time. Seems to me that the EURO best depicts a reasonable depiction of this broad complex gyre and the timing that would necessitate to eventually organize in the BOC. In a way, the EURO isn't really quite as fast as the NAVGEM or CMC suggests organization will occur. One very interesting note here, notice how the UK has ZERO development in the GOM from this event. That would be something worth noting should no development on the Atlantic side occur from this.


To clarify, are you excluding the BoC when you say the UK doesn’t develop in the GoM? 12z UKMET develops in BoC and sends low slowly ESE into Yucatán vicinity:

NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 48 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+ 48 : 19.3N 93.8W


Thank you, good catch! I couldn't figure out what you were referring to and realized I was referencing an older cached UK model run that didn't depict any BOC reformation LOL.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.



Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 18871
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#18 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun May 31, 2020 11:46 am

12z HWRF has it over the BOC in 24hrs as a intact TD/TS
0 likes   
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3309
Age: 59
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#19 Postby chaser1 » Sun May 31, 2020 12:05 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:12z HWRF has it over the BOC in 24hrs as a intact TD/TS


Damn, now that's a bit scary! It's presently the most aggressive on longer term upside intensity. To be honest though, I think it's also a bit fast on it's development/reorganization.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.



BYG Jacob
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:46 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#20 Postby BYG Jacob » Sun May 31, 2020 12:06 pm

Given the conditions in the gulf, this has the potential top surprise a lot of people
0 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest