ATL: SAM - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15434
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#821 Postby Kingarabian » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:01 pm

130-135kts right now. Will need recon for anything higher.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#822 Postby aspen » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:03 pm

Wow, Sam might be trying to become a Cat 5. Miss Piggy’s first pass will probably be the most anticipated recon pass since the night Eta went T#8.0 — and Sam might be close to Eta’s intensity during that flight.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15951
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#823 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:04 pm

4 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4487
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#824 Postby psyclone » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:08 pm

Might not be a cat 5 but it sure looks like a high end cat 4 super typhoon (150mph) type system. What's up with the outflow/arc clouds racing out well away from the system? Those types of clouds in lesser systems are frequently referenced to bolster a weak/weakening trend. kind of strange to see them in such a high end and strengthening system
0 likes   

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#825 Postby grapealcoholic » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:10 pm

Look at the CDO symmetry. No way it isn't a Cat 5
2 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#826 Postby Teban54 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:11 pm

Image
7 likes   

SteveM
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:21 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#827 Postby SteveM » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:12 pm

grapealcoholic wrote:Look at the CDO symmetry. No way it isn't a Cat 5


We shall see soon.
0 likes   

User avatar
galaxy401
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2299
Age: 28
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
Location: Casa Grande, Arizona

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#828 Postby galaxy401 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:15 pm

Every time I come back to look at Sam, he's looking better and better. I'm willing to bet by Recon he's around 130 kts.
2 likes   
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1966
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#829 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:17 pm

Wow. Its core is unreal! What a sight!
1 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
Woofde
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:33 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#830 Postby Woofde » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:17 pm

I don't trust sattilite estimates, they are very subjective and often misleading with intense storms. I'm glad we have recon headed out there to tell us what's actually happening.
1 likes   

User avatar
DioBrando
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 917
Age: 27
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:45 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#831 Postby DioBrando » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:17 pm

galaxy401 wrote:Every time I come back to look at Sam, he's looking better and better. I'm willing to bet by Recon he's around 130 kts.

I'd personally say around 135 kts, seems to be more organized/better looking core than most 130 kt systems I've seen. Plus sam looks much better than matthew and lorenzo.
0 likes   
blonde stacey (xe/xem/xir)

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#832 Postby Teban54 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:19 pm

DioBrando wrote:
galaxy401 wrote:Every time I come back to look at Sam, he's looking better and better. I'm willing to bet by Recon he's around 130 kts.

I'd personally say around 135 kts, seems to be more organized/better looking core than most 130 kt systems I've seen. Plus sam looks much better than matthew and lorenzo.

I think we can safely say Matthew wasn't a Cat 5 at this point.
4 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1767
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#833 Postby kevin » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:20 pm

Teban54 wrote:
DioBrando wrote:
galaxy401 wrote:Every time I come back to look at Sam, he's looking better and better. I'm willing to bet by Recon he's around 130 kts.

I'd personally say around 135 kts, seems to be more organized/better looking core than most 130 kt systems I've seen. Plus sam looks much better than matthew and lorenzo.

I think we can safely say Matthew wasn't a Cat 5 at this point.


Yeah not to get off-topic, but Matthew definitely needs some reanalysis with the knowledge we gained of SFMR since then.
1 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#834 Postby Teban54 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:20 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
DioBrando
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 917
Age: 27
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:45 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#835 Postby DioBrando » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:22 pm

kevin wrote:
Teban54 wrote:
DioBrando wrote:I'd personally say around 135 kts, seems to be more organized/better looking core than most 130 kt systems I've seen. Plus sam looks much better than matthew and lorenzo.

I think we can safely say Matthew wasn't a Cat 5 at this point.


Yeah not to get off-topic, but Matthew definitely needs some reanalysis with the knowledge we gained of SFMR since then.

I second this, Matthew legit looked like a storm that was kicked in the face by a bull
0 likes   
blonde stacey (xe/xem/xir)

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19165
Age: 60
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#836 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:25 pm

5 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#837 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:25 pm

I know we will get an advisory based on Dvorak and likely conservative. If Recon finds something dramatically different, a Special Advisory around 6 pm is certainly possible.
5 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1966
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#838 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:27 pm

I think we can say this is safely not an Eta case due to its much more stable structure than Eta. Also when was the last time we saw such a thick eyewall in the Atlantic?
1 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#839 Postby supercane4867 » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:28 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:I think we can say this is safely not an Eta case due to its much more stable structure than Eta. Also when was the last time we saw such a thick eyewall in the Atlantic?


Irma
4 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1966
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#840 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Sat Sep 25, 2021 3:30 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
InfernoFlameCat wrote:I think we can say this is safely not an Eta case due to its much more stable structure than Eta. Also when was the last time we saw such a thick eyewall in the Atlantic?


Irma

Yessir, and guess what, this is almost as visually stunning (in the sense you just stare at Sam in awe) and beautiful as Irma!
1 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests