ATL: SAM - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7286
Age: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1601 Postby Sciencerocks » Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:14 am

Image
6 likes   

Michele B
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 906
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1602 Postby Michele B » Tue Sep 28, 2021 11:40 am

kevin wrote:First visual of Sam today. Still has to clear out the eye on visual, but it's already cleared out on IR. Looks quite healthy. I think ~7 hours from now might be the perfect time for recon to catch Sam at another peak as it'll give the Wring time to fix itself (broken to the NE right now) and the eye time to clear out. Raw T# up to 6.4 btw.

https://i.imgur.com/5hTj1vl.jpg


He's beautiful!
3 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1768
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1603 Postby kevin » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:25 pm

First pass 945.5 mbar with 118 kt FL and 120 kt SFMR. Considering the pressure drop since the previous recon I would assume the strongest quadrant has 120 kt so that would be 946mb/120kt. Despite a less than great IR appearance it looks like Sam is intensifying. If Sam is already this strong now I think there might still be an outside shot for a high-end cat 4 or low-end cat 5 tomorrow when it passes over higher OHC.
3 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1604 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:31 pm

I'm thinking that the data support 110 kts surface wind. The higher SFMR values were flagged as unreliable, with the exception of a 74kt FL and 120kt SFMR wind, which seems unreasonable. NHC will probably keep it 115 kts.
3 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1768
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1605 Postby kevin » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:33 pm

Anyone else who can no longer find Sam as a floater on Tropicaltidbits?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1606 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:35 pm

kevin wrote:Anyone else who can no longer find Sam as a floater on Tropicaltidbits?


I see it listed to the right of 90L and 91L.
1 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1768
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1607 Postby kevin » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:36 pm

wxman57 wrote:
kevin wrote:Anyone else who can no longer find Sam as a floater on Tropicaltidbits?


I see it listed to the right of 90L and 91L.


Yes, it's also back now for me. No idea what happened there, maybe an issue on my side. Thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5530
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1608 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:42 pm

kevin wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
kevin wrote:Anyone else who can no longer find Sam as a floater on Tropicaltidbits?


I see it listed to the right of 90L and 91L.


Yes, it's also back now for me. No idea what happened there, maybe an issue on my side. Thanks.

There were some really exciting cumulus clouds over Texas they had to switch to ;)
2 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1609 Postby Teban54 » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:47 pm

kevin wrote:First pass 945.5 mbar with 118 kt FL and 120 kt SFMR. Considering the pressure drop since the previous recon I would assume the strongest quadrant has 120 kt so that would be 946mb/120kt. Despite a less than great IR appearance it looks like Sam is intensifying. If Sam is already this strong now I think there might still be an outside shot for a high-end cat 4 or low-end cat 5 tomorrow when it passes over higher OHC.

Are there any plausible explanations why Sam might still be intensifying (and definitely still deepening) even though it looks like crap on IR?
0 likes   

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1610 Postby grapealcoholic » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:47 pm

skyline385 wrote:Think Sam is a good example of why ACE needs to be updated (with wind radii at the very least), its so tiny and is just chilling out there massively inflating the ACE for the season and will end up having much more ACE than even Ida which was a stronger system...

It balances out when you account for the nonlinearity of the kinetic energy calculation -- extreme winds produce significantly more energy than moderate winds
0 likes   

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1611 Postby grapealcoholic » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:51 pm

Teban54 wrote:
kevin wrote:First pass 945.5 mbar with 118 kt FL and 120 kt SFMR. Considering the pressure drop since the previous recon I would assume the strongest quadrant has 120 kt so that would be 946mb/120kt. Despite a less than great IR appearance it looks like Sam is intensifying. If Sam is already this strong now I think there might still be an outside shot for a high-end cat 4 or low-end cat 5 tomorrow when it passes over higher OHC.

Are there any plausible explanations why Sam might still be intensifying (and definitely still deepening) even though it looks like crap on IR?

Low and mid-levels look good on microwave so inner core pressure is staying low
0 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3535
Age: 29
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1612 Postby Extratropical94 » Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:53 pm

948/10kts on the center drop, so the pressure is at 947 now.
7 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

grapealcoholic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 634
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1613 Postby grapealcoholic » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:06 pm

Also something about ADT -- it's pretty smart about not jumping the gun to weaken a storm. CI is still at 119 kts

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1614 Postby aspen » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:09 pm

Teban54 wrote:
kevin wrote:First pass 945.5 mbar with 118 kt FL and 120 kt SFMR. Considering the pressure drop since the previous recon I would assume the strongest quadrant has 120 kt so that would be 946mb/120kt. Despite a less than great IR appearance it looks like Sam is intensifying. If Sam is already this strong now I think there might still be an outside shot for a high-end cat 4 or low-end cat 5 tomorrow when it passes over higher OHC.

Are there any plausible explanations why Sam might still be intensifying (and definitely still deepening) even though it looks like crap on IR?

The current structure is good enough for deepening, but it would appear that Sam’s outflow setup is quite poor, preventing the eye from clearing out. Unless the setup improves in the next 36 hours, this is as strong as Sam’s gonna get.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

zzh
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:18 pm

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1615 Postby zzh » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:09 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8913
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1616 Postby Iceresistance » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:11 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
kevin wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
I see it listed to the right of 90L and 91L.


Yes, it's also back now for me. No idea what happened there, maybe an issue on my side. Thanks.

There were some really exciting cumulus clouds over Texas they had to switch to ;)


WeatherNerds does not need Floaters for Systems, you can zoom to one of them to track . . .
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1617 Postby aspen » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:20 pm


I’m guessing the weak SE eyewall is an issue too. Must be a bit of shear that got just enough dry air into Sam’s circulation.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1618 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:22 pm

I use RealEarth (SSEC) for satellite data worldwide. Can choose which satellite to use. You can see my preferences in the screenshot below. I have GOES-East True Color selected. The only issue with RealEarth is the looping is a bit clunky.

https://realearth.ssec.wisc.edu/

Image
6 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1619 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:26 pm

Here's a zoomed-in true color view of Sam using RealEarth:

Image
7 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8913
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: ATL: SAM - Hurricane - Discussion

#1620 Postby Iceresistance » Tue Sep 28, 2021 1:29 pm

Does Sam look like an Annular Hurricane on Satellite?
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests