Tropical Storm FLOSSIE (CPAC): Discussions, Analysis and Ima

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#61 Postby Chacor » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:53 am

Which was the last CPac storm to warrant recon?
0 likes   

cyclonic chronic

#62 Postby cyclonic chronic » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:59 am

did ioke have recon?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#63 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:59 am

I believe Jimena in 2003. Hawaii was under a Hurricane Watch and TS Warning

In 1994, there was a LOT of recon for the CPAC (may have even been more than the Atlantic)
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

Re:

#64 Postby Chacor » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:03 am

cyclonic chronic wrote:did ioke have recon?


No it didn't as it didn't pose a threat to the state.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#65 Postby Chacor » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:32 am

You know the Atlantic season is slow when cnn.com says "The U.S. National Hurricane Center says Tropical Storm Flossie has strengthened into a hurricane in the Pacific Ocean." is breaking news.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#66 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:33 am

not necessarily

I think it is because of the Hawaii threat. Any possible TS or hurricane threat to the USA these days is major news
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#67 Postby Chacor » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:35 am

Derek Ortt wrote:not necessarily

I think it is because of the Hawaii threat. Any possible TS or hurricane threat to the USA these days is major news


Given that that "threat" is still a good 4-5 days out and might possibly not verify...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#68 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:35 pm

our media goes gaga when a cumulus cloud threatens to form into a depression, much less when a hurricane is threatening
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#69 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:06 pm

Cosme was a bigger threat at this time and I didn't hear a peep from the media.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#70 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:07 pm

Cosme? Cosme only had a chance to affect the islands as a minimal storm
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#71 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:08 pm

Wasn't Cosme 65kts at around 135W?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#72 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:16 pm

I thik it was at 130KT and it only lasted for 6 hours and the forecast had it over cold water.

Flossie is starting to intensify quite a bit this afternoon and is over warm water
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6628
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#73 Postby Cyclenall » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:16 pm

I was actually a little bit surprised because Flossie didn't look the best early this morning but then the eye popped out and all is good. Can it last through til the Cpac as a hurricane?

The following post is NOT an official forecast/product and should not be used as such. It's just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Third % chance of Hurricane Flossie becoming a:

Tropical Depression: 100%
Tropical Storm: 100%
Hurricane: 100%
Category 2 Hurricane: 45%
Category 3 Hurricane: 30%
Category 4 Hurricane: 5%
Category 5 Hurricane: 1% ~ (Mostly unknown due the the fact this could cross into the Cpac and then go the "Ioke way" by small chance since it's August and that time of year)
Last edited by Cyclenall on Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#74 Postby WindRunner » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:22 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I thik it was at 130KT and it only lasted for 6 hours and the forecast had it over cold water.

Flossie is starting to intensify quite a bit this afternoon and is over warm water


Cosme was 130kts? Surely you mean 130W? :lol:


But yes . . . this cannot be compared to Cosme at all . . . especially as there is a more significant WNW/NW component to the expected motion.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#75 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:35 pm

130KT... oh dear... 130W
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#76 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:07 pm

models now initialized at 75KT
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#77 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:13 pm

Image

10/1800 UTC 12.6N 136.6W T4.5/4.5 FLOSSIE

4.5 = 77 kt
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#78 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:17 pm

it is starting to look like a 5.0/5.0 on the latest imagery with the eye clearing out and deeper convection on the western side.

The intensity forecast models have not performed well at all with this one
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#79 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:19 pm

Derek, are you expecting 75 or 80 kt at 2100?

And you are right about the intensity. The NHC has really had a bad run with this.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Tropical Storm Flossie in EPAC

#80 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:24 pm

could go either way, dpeending upon the TAFB estimate and how well it looks at 5. I'd go with 75KT... but then again I am very conservative (I am one who will not call something a hurricane until exactly 64KT has been reached... had 77KT at flight level once during Ophelia during RAINEX and refused to upgrade to hurricane status for the field project as 77KT equates to about 61.6KT, below the thresshold
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests