Tropical Depression SEPAT: Discussions, Analysis and Image

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
milankovitch
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 243
Age: 39
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Menands, NY; SUNY Albany
Contact:

Re:

#121 Postby milankovitch » Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:24 am

wxmann_91 wrote:Now undergoing an ERC. Not sure if it will complete by landfall, but it may.


http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... hr_08.html

This ends 5hrs ago. You can see the outer eyewall beginning to solidify and the moat beginning to form. With about 24hrs to landfall it's hard to say if the EWRC would complete or not. My opinion would be that given the size of the outer eye 24hrs will not be enough time for the EWRC to complete and the new eyewall to shrink down. Result... at landfall we'll see a big 60-80mi wide ragged eye with a very expansive but weaker windfield.

Not an official forecast!
0 likes   

cyclonic chronic

#122 Postby cyclonic chronic » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:12 pm

this is a monster! too bad there is no recon for it. this might be one of the strongest typhoons in the past 50 yrs. a close second to tip? maybe?
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1667
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re:

#123 Postby bob rulz » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:26 pm

cyclonic chronic wrote:this is a monster! too bad there is no recon for it. this might be one of the strongest typhoons in the past 50 yrs. a close second to tip? maybe?


I wouldn't say that. That's probably pushing it. It's definitely very powerful.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re:

#124 Postby WindRunner » Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:17 pm

cyclonic chronic wrote:this is a monster! too bad there is no recon for it. this might be one of the strongest typhoons in the past 50 yrs. a close second to tip? maybe?


No, there are several dozen cyclones since Tip that have been stronger than this . . . we had two or three (not all WPAC storms) last year . . .
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#125 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:11 pm

cyclonic chronic wrote:this is a monster! too bad there is no recon for it. this might be one of the strongest typhoons in the past 50 yrs. a close second to tip? maybe?


No offence intended and I don't know how long you have been tracking typhoons but these monsters are very common every year. That's why in previous posts I stated "the WPAC never disappoints." Atlantic's 2005 season is quite common in the WPAC.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#126 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:13 pm

Here are all the typhoons either as strong or stronger than Sepat (either measured or estimated by the JMA):

LINK
0 likes   

cyclonic chronic

Re: Re:

#127 Postby cyclonic chronic » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:20 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
cyclonic chronic wrote:this is a monster! too bad there is no recon for it. this might be one of the strongest typhoons in the past 50 yrs. a close second to tip? maybe?


No offence intended and I don't know how long you have been tracking typhoons but these monsters are very common every year. That's why in previous posts I stated "the WPAC never disappoints." Atlantic's 2005 season is quite common in the WPAC.


no offence taken. ive only recently started to study wpac systems. for obvious reasons most of my study has been the atl. and epac. one of my main questions is, tropical waves seem to form alot of the atl. TC's. yet what do the wpac systems form from? monsoon troughs? cant find alot on the subject. thanx
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#128 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:24 pm

There hasn't been a sub 910mb system in 9 years. So for all we know this could be a 890mb storm, but the JMA doesn't seem to want to go below 910.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Re:

#129 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:34 pm

cyclonic chronic wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:
cyclonic chronic wrote:this is a monster! too bad there is no recon for it. this might be one of the strongest typhoons in the past 50 yrs. a close second to tip? maybe?


No offence intended and I don't know how long you have been tracking typhoons but these monsters are very common every year. That's why in previous posts I stated "the WPAC never disappoints." Atlantic's 2005 season is quite common in the WPAC.


no offence taken. ive only recently started to study wpac systems. for obvious reasons most of my study has been the atl. and epac. one of my main questions is, tropical waves seem to form alot of the atl. TC's. yet what do the wpac systems form from? monsoon troughs? cant find alot on the subject. thanx

The usual... old TUTT's, monsoonal troughs, and monsoonal gyres.

I just googled up these: (the second one requires a subscription though)
Lander, M.A., 1994. Description of a Monsoon Gyre and Its Effects on the Tropical Cyclones in the Western North Pacific during August 1991.
Chen, T., 2004. Role of the Monsoon Gyre in the Interannual Variation of Tropical Cyclone Formation over the Western North Pacific.
0 likes   

cyclonic chronic

#130 Postby cyclonic chronic » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:48 pm

"The usual... old TUTT's, monsoonal troughs, and monsoonal gyres.

I just googled up these: (the second one requires a subscription though)
Lander, M.A., 1994. Description of a Monsoon Gyre and Its Effects on the Tropical Cyclones in the Western North Pacific during August 1991.
Chen, T., 2004. Role of the Monsoon Gyre in the Interannual Variation of Tropical Cyclone Formation over the Western North Pacific."

thanx got some good reading now
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re:

#131 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:50 pm

cyclonic chronic wrote:"The usual... old TUTT's, monsoonal troughs, and monsoonal gyres.

I just googled up these: (the second one requires a subscription though)
Lander, M.A., 1994. Description of a Monsoon Gyre and Its Effects on the Tropical Cyclones in the Western North Pacific during August 1991.
Chen, T., 2004. Role of the Monsoon Gyre in the Interannual Variation of Tropical Cyclone Formation over the Western North Pacific."

thanx got some good reading now

No problem.

Note that most do actually form out of monsoonal troughs, only few form out of the other two. But I believe (not 100% sure about this), that the two storms before SEPAT, WUTIP and PABUK, formed out of a monsoonal gyre.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#132 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:10 pm

Image

Double eye-wall???
0 likes   

User avatar
btangy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:06 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

#133 Postby btangy » Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:28 pm

Inner eyewall has totally collapsed:

http://tcweb.fnmoc.navy.mil/tc_thumbs/2 ... 124.8E.jpg

That's one huge eye!
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#134 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:26 pm

Almost done... IR images almost looks like Katrina right before she cleared her eye, except much more circular storm shape.

BUT, only 18 hr stands b/t right now and landfall, and let's not forget the effects of land interaction (some dry air entrainment is already taking place with the warmer cloud tops).

Image
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

#135 Postby whereverwx » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:08 pm

This is when the storm was near peak intensity. I really like these detailed images from RAMMB.

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#136 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm

calamity, have you been saving images from SSD?
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

Re:

#137 Postby whereverwx » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:14 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:calamity, have you been saving images from SSD?

No, I have not. I haven't saved any images of the recent storms, either, including Dean.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5272
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re:

#138 Postby Ptarmigan » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:57 pm

cyclonic chronic wrote:this is a monster! too bad there is no recon for it. this might be one of the strongest typhoons in the past 50 yrs. a close second to tip? maybe?


It's probably very strong, but not the strongest. My guess would be around 885 to 895 mb with winds of 160 to 165 mph.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5272
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Re:

#139 Postby Ptarmigan » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:58 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
No offence intended and I don't know how long you have been tracking typhoons but these monsters are very common every year. That's why in previous posts I stated "the WPAC never disappoints." Atlantic's 2005 season is quite common in the WPAC.


Atlantic 2005 is a typical season in the West Pacific, 28 storms form on average.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Re:

#140 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:50 pm

calamity wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:calamity, have you been saving images from SSD?

No, I have not. I haven't saved any images of the recent storms, either, including Dean.

:(

I've got the sat images covered. :)

BTW, convection continues to weaken. Barring some DMAX magic (which really becomes negligible for a storm of Sepat's depth), I'm not sure it will make landfall in Taiwan as a Cat 4-5.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests