INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6617
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#921 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:00 pm

Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Javlin wrote:Derek and AFM I look at cloud track sometimes as a signal to movement and they seem to be going NNW towards TX/LA line is that wrong?Sure 12-20hrs from now they might be going NW or WNW but is that a decent assumption for motion maybe in the next 12hrs?Kevin


I'd be surprised if it would go as far East as LA/TX border, but, it wouldn't be shocking. I'm calling around Galveston right now....a Cat. 1 hurricane. It won't be a horrible event, but, I see a signifcant system moving in...and I don't particularly see it moving very fast all the way into the Coast, which could spell a great deal of rain for SW and SCentral LA, IMO. We'll see....I'm only watching clouds.



If it goes in that far north (Upper TX coast)the rain squalls could easily extend toward SE La.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6617
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#922 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:01 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Javlin wrote:Derek and AFM I look at cloud track sometimes as a signal to movement and they seem to be going NNW towards TX/LA line is that wrong?Sure 12-20hrs from now they might be going NW or WNW but is that a decent assumption for motion maybe in the next 12hrs?Kevin


I'd be surprised if it would go as far East as LA/TX border, but, it wouldn't be shocking. I'm calling around Galveston right now....a Cat. 1 hurricane. It won't be a horrible event, but, I see a signifcant system moving in...and I don't particularly see it moving very fast all the way into the Coast, which could spell a great deal of rain for SW and SCentral LA, IMO. We'll see....I'm only watching clouds.


I'm thinking a fast-mover between Brownsville and Corpus Christi, perhaps slipping north late...


A less likely scenario in my opinion at the moment.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8076
Age: 50
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#923 Postby jasons2k » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:02 pm

Kludge wrote:I don't know about you guys, but if I worked at the NHC and had the choice between being known forever as...

1) The idiiot who gave a name to an open wave or
2) The idiot who didn't upgrade an obvious TD that became a stong TS overnight and surprised coastal folks

...I would choose 1) every day. Maybe it's just me. :P


Quote of the day LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#924 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:02 pm

jschlitz wrote:This is just a little observation -

On this evening's radar, the presentation of the seabreeze is the boldest/thickest I have ever seen it. I've never seen it look like this, eerily strange.

Also, some of the dying showers & mid-level moisture being picked-up moving from LA are moving really fast to the SW...

Image




that almost looks like outflow boundaries to me.....but yeah very strange indeed.....
0 likes   

k4sdi
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:56 am

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#925 Postby k4sdi » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:04 pm

HarlequinBoy wrote:Just a note, The Weather Channel already has Jeff Morrow in Port Aransas.


My wife says that area is safe unless Jim heads down there!
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#926 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:06 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:cannot issue warnings if there is no TC


Hi, all, thought I'd chime in before dinner. I've been looking at this thing since 5am. Derek, your quote above is probably one of the best reasons for the NHC to be lenient and upgrade it to a TD. I do think it has a much better-defined LLC than Grace ever did. What's lacking, as AFM said, is any significant effects over the lease areas. I was surprised the NHC didn't upgrade it at 4pm.

The NHC's primary job is to warn the public of potential threats from tropical cyclones. Sometimes, they may have to "fudge it" a little so that they can accomplish their mission. I've seen it discussed on this thread before that the NHC would upgrade something in the Gulf or near the southeast U.S. coast that they'd never upgrade by Africa or in the open Atlantic. That's because there is a possible threat to the public. In this case, it seems fairly obvious that this will very likely become at least a minimal TS before moving ashore into the lower to mid TX coast Thursday morning. If the NHC waits until 4am to call it a TD, then that's only about 24 hours lead time for any preparations. Why not just call it a TD this afternoon (or this evening, now) a little early to give the public a little extra time to do whatever they have to do? I have great respect for the NHC forecasters, they have a tough job. Must have been a long discussion about what to do this afternoon. But I don't think they'll wait to upgrade it tomorrow morning.

Oh, and my gut feeling says north of Corpus Christi. The LLC will form beneath the ball of convection near 24.8N/90W not out in the open where it was initialized at 00z. Probably a 40-45 mph TS (in small pockets). Nothing too significant.

Doesn't really matter to me much, except that we put out the word to our clients early last Friday about potential development Mon/Tue in the SW Gulf and one client called in to complain that we were "alarmists", saying the NHC was forecasting "no development", as was one private wx company that I won't name here which just repackages NHC advisories. I explained that the NHC was only talking about potential development through Saturday, not through the following week. So it better develop! Come on, Erin! Ok, I'll take a TD 5, if nothing else! ;-)
0 likes   

User avatar
HeeBGBz
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Age: 69
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#927 Postby HeeBGBz » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:09 pm

k4sdi wrote:
HarlequinBoy wrote:Just a note, The Weather Channel already has Jeff Morrow in Port Aransas.


My wife says that area is safe unless Jim heads down there!


Jim appears to be hanging with Flossie in Hawaii. Not a bad gig.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#928 Postby KatDaddy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:10 pm

Excellent explanation and discussion as always Wxman57.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#929 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:11 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Javlin wrote:Derek and AFM I look at cloud track sometimes as a signal to movement and they seem to be going NNW towards TX/LA line is that wrong?Sure 12-20hrs from now they might be going NW or WNW but is that a decent assumption for motion maybe in the next 12hrs?Kevin


I'd be surprised if it would go as far East as LA/TX border, but, it wouldn't be shocking. I'm calling around Galveston right now....a Cat. 1 hurricane. It won't be a horrible event, but, I see a signifcant system moving in...and I don't particularly see it moving very fast all the way into the Coast, which could spell a great deal of rain for SW and SCentral LA, IMO. We'll see....I'm only watching clouds.



If it goes in that far north (Upper TX coast)the rain squalls could easily extend toward SE La.

I agree, but, the rain would be nice and since the drainage system in New Orleans has recently been completely flushed for this season, we can handle the rain. It would be nice to not have to have my sprinklers on for two to three hours every evening. We'll see. I just see the system heading W/NW and then turning more N/NW just before landfall....
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#930 Postby RL3AO » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:11 pm

I agree with every word you just said Wxman.
0 likes   

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1568
Age: 62
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#931 Postby Javlin » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:11 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Javlin wrote:Derek and AFM I look at cloud track sometimes as a signal to movement and they seem to be going NNW towards TX/LA line is that wrong?Sure 12-20hrs from now they might be going NW or WNW but is that a decent assumption for motion maybe in the next 12hrs?Kevin


I'd be surprised if it would go as far East as LA/TX border, but, it wouldn't be shocking. I'm calling around Galveston right now....a Cat. 1 hurricane. It won't be a horrible event, but, I see a signifcant system moving in...and I don't particularly see it moving very fast all the way into the Coast, which could spell a great deal of rain for SW and SCentral LA, IMO. We'll see....I'm only watching clouds.



If it goes in that far north (Upper TX coast)the rain squalls could easily extend toward SE La.


Well it was just a thought I guess it would really have to stack and develop to feel the effects of the upper ATM.Kevin
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#932 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:12 pm

thanks for chiming in Wx57 I know you have a hard road ahead with Erin and Dean....hang in there....
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8076
Age: 50
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#933 Postby jasons2k » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:12 pm

Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Javlin wrote:Derek and AFM I look at cloud track sometimes as a signal to movement and they seem to be going NNW towards TX/LA line is that wrong?Sure 12-20hrs from now they might be going NW or WNW but is that a decent assumption for motion maybe in the next 12hrs?Kevin


I'd be surprised if it would go as far East as LA/TX border, but, it wouldn't be shocking. I'm calling around Galveston right now....a Cat. 1 hurricane. It won't be a horrible event, but, I see a signifcant system moving in...and I don't particularly see it moving very fast all the way into the Coast, which could spell a great deal of rain for SW and SCentral LA, IMO. We'll see....I'm only watching clouds.


Sean, you scare me. I'll never forget you were the first to call LC for Rita and everyone, including me, including all the pro mets, thought you were crazy at the time.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#934 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:13 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:cannot issue warnings if there is no TC


Hi, all, thought I'd chime in before dinner. I've been looking at this thing since 5am. Derek, your quote above is probably one of the best reasons for the NHC to be lenient and upgrade it to a TD. I do think it has a much better-defined LLC than Grace ever did. What's lacking, as AFM said, is any significant effects over the lease areas. I was surprised the NHC didn't upgrade it at 4pm.

The NHC's primary job is to warn the public of potential threats from tropical cyclones. Sometimes, they may have to "fudge it" a little so that they can accomplish their mission. I've seen it discussed on this thread before that the NHC would upgrade something in the Gulf or near the southeast U.S. coast that they'd never upgrade by Africa or in the open Atlantic. That's because there is a possible threat to the public. In this case, it seems fairly obvious that this will very likely become at least a minimal TS before moving ashore into the lower to mid TX coast Thursday morning. If the NHC waits until 4am to call it a TD, then that's only about 24 hours lead time for any preparations. Why not just call it a TD this afternoon (or this evening, now) a little early to give the public a little extra time to do whatever they have to do? I have great respect for the NHC forecasters, they have a tough job. Must have been a long discussion about what to do this afternoon. But I don't think they'll wait to upgrade it tomorrow morning.

Oh, and my gut feeling says north of Corpus Christi. The LLC will form beneath the ball of convection near 24.8N/90W not out in the open where it was initialized at 00z. Probably a 40-45 mph TS (in small pockets). Nothing too significant.

Doesn't really matter to me much, except that we put out the word to our clients early last Friday about potential development Mon/Tue in the SW Gulf and one client called in to complain that we were "alarmists", saying the NHC was forecasting "no development", as was one private wx company that I won't name here which just repackages NHC advisories. I explained that the NHC was only talking about potential development through Saturday, not through the following week. So it better develop! Come on, Erin! Ok, I'll take a TD 5, if nothing else! ;-)


Great Post wxman57. Tough day at the office? I agree with an advisory classifing this shortly. 24 hours is not enough time for the public to react.
0 likes   

User avatar
btangy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:06 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#935 Postby btangy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:13 pm

Here's an interesting idea for discussion:

Should the NHC issue watches for storms that have not been classified as a depression or storm but are clearly on their way to becoming one? This is particularly pertinent for AL91.

IMO, given that the strict definition of a TS watch is that tropical storm conditions may be expected within 36 hours, I feel the NHC does not have to wait for TD5 to officially be announced before issuing watches (warnings, I think they should still hold off on). As an example, consider tornado watches issued by the SPC or blizzard watches for an impending nor'easter. SPC doesn't wait for the first tornado to touch down before issuing a watch and WFOs don't issue blizzard watches once the first snowflakes start falling. If tropical cyclogenesis is clearly occurring as it is now, then I feel the NHC is warranted and perhaps even responsible given their mission statement to issue watches for portions of the coastline that they feel may be under the gun in under 36 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#936 Postby tailgater » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:14 pm

latest from buoy 42001
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42001
buoy 42002
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42002
Note the pressure is lower at 42002 and the winds are stronger. Doesn't seem to be getting organized very quickly to me.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#937 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:14 pm

jschlitz wrote:
Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Javlin wrote:Derek and AFM I look at cloud track sometimes as a signal to movement and they seem to be going NNW towards TX/LA line is that wrong?Sure 12-20hrs from now they might be going NW or WNW but is that a decent assumption for motion maybe in the next 12hrs?Kevin


I'd be surprised if it would go as far East as LA/TX border, but, it wouldn't be shocking. I'm calling around Galveston right now....a Cat. 1 hurricane. It won't be a horrible event, but, I see a signifcant system moving in...and I don't particularly see it moving very fast all the way into the Coast, which could spell a great deal of rain for SW and SCentral LA, IMO. We'll see....I'm only watching clouds.


Sean, you scare me. I'll never forget you were the first to call LC for Rita and everyone, including me, including all the pro mets, thought you were crazy at the time.


LOL...and I was calling that from Illinois. That doesn't mean I'm right this time, jschitlz. But, I have a pretty good sense of smell once a system is in the GOM. We'll see....
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 40
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#938 Postby wx247 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:15 pm

Dr. Steve Lyons just said "nothing is developing" in the Gulf, citing 13 mph winds near the "core". I don't know about him sometimes.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: Re:

#939 Postby miamicanes177 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:16 pm

srainhoutx wrote:Great Post wxman57. Tough day at the office? I agree with an advisory classifing this shortly. 24 hours is not enough time for the public to react.
This was called disturbance invest 91L on the 00Z models. Therefore, I put the chances of this being called tropical depression 5 by 10pm tonight at less than 1%
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Houston, TX

#940 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:16 pm

well of course winds are light near the "core". lol. They did find 30-36mph surface winds to the north of the center though (according to recon), so they have definitely seen higher than 13mph winds!
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests