Invest 94L,Near Windwards-Discussions

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139067
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Invest 94L,Near Windwards-Discussions

#1 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:39 am

0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139067
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 94L in Central Atlantic-Discussions-Analysis-Imagery

#2 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:41 am


WHXX01 KWBC 281232
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1232 UTC TUE AUG 28 2007

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.

ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL942007) 20070828 1200 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
070828 1200 070829 0000 070829 1200 070830 0000

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 10.5N 40.0W 10.7N 42.9W 11.3N 45.8W 12.1N 48.4W
BAMD 10.5N 40.0W 10.7N 42.7W 10.5N 45.3W 10.0N 47.6W
BAMM 10.5N 40.0W 10.7N 42.7W 10.7N 45.4W 10.6N 47.9W
LBAR 10.5N 40.0W 10.8N 43.2W 10.9N 46.2W 10.9N 49.0W
SHIP 25KTS 29KTS 36KTS 43KTS
DSHP 25KTS 29KTS 36KTS 43KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
070830 1200 070831 1200 070901 1200 070902 1200

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 12.9N 51.1W 14.2N 56.1W 14.3N 60.7W 14.2N 65.9W
BAMD 9.4N 49.9W 9.0N 54.8W 9.3N 60.4W 9.4N 65.9W
BAMM 10.3N 50.4W 10.2N 55.8W 10.2N 61.7W 10.3N 67.6W
LBAR 10.7N 51.8W 10.7N 57.3W 11.1N 62.7W 10.2N 65.6W
SHIP 51KTS 64KTS 75KTS 82KTS
DSHP 51KTS 64KTS 72KTS 44KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 10.5N LONCUR = 40.0W DIRCUR = 270DEG SPDCUR = 20KT
LATM12 = 10.4N LONM12 = 36.0W DIRM12 = 272DEG SPDM12 = 20KT
LATM24 = 10.2N LONM24 = 32.0W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 40NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1010MB OUTRAD = 120NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#3 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:43 am

conditions are quite favorable for rapikd intensification if this ever comes together
0 likes   

User avatar
punkyg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: sanford florida

#4 Postby punkyg » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:44 am

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/catl/vis-l.jpg

right now 94L don't look that impressive to me, but like always we gotta wait and see what happens.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4391
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re:

#5 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:46 am

Derek Ortt wrote:conditions are quite favorable for rapikd intensification if this ever comes together



Does have a nice Envelope for Rapikd intensification...LOL
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:49 am

looking at the BAM suite, a stronger storm may move more south in this instance... will look more whern I get into the office. Woul be awful news as SA is very poorly quipped to handle canes and TCs are very destructive there
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6306
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: Invest 94L in Central Atlantic-Discussions-Analysis-Imagery

#7 Postby boca » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:55 am

I used to think that South America was safe from storms in the Northern Hemisphere due to the coriolis effect of systems moving alittle north of due west. I guess I was wrong especially if 94L develops and hits South America.
http://my.sfwmd.gov/sfwmd/common/images ... orm_94.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4391
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#8 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:56 am

I would not count on the Bamms Verifing...2 of the globals ive seen so far bring this N of PR and east of the Bahamas..
0 likes   

User avatar
stormchazer
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2458
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Contact:

#9 Postby stormchazer » Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:58 am

Seems premature to name this an invest based on its appearance but I am sensing from Derek's comments that the conditions look better then good for development, if it choses to develop.

Lets see the good research folk post storms that have hit SA from this location?!!
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: Invest 94L in Central Atlantic-Discussions-Analysis-Imagery

#10 Postby clfenwi » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:04 am

stormchazer wrote:Seems premature to name this an invest based on its appearance but I am sensing from Derek's comments that the conditions look better then good for development, if it choses to develop.

Lets see the good research folk post storms that have hit SA from this location?!!


Alma, 1974

Image

Also, Bret 1993

Image

One more, started further south, but went north before curving back south

Image
Last edited by clfenwi on Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#11 Postby Chacor » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:07 am

Interesting to compare the SHIPS runs with the LGEM that was referenced quite a bit during Dean:

Code: Select all

TIME (HR)          0     6    12    18    24    36    48    60    72    84    96   108   120
V (KT) NO LAND    25    27    29    32    36    43    51    57    64    69    75    79    82
V (KT) LAND       25    27    29    32    36    43    51    57    64    69    72    59    44
V (KT) LGE mod    25    26    27    28    30    34    40    46    53    62    63    54    48
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#12 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:07 am

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:I would not count on the Bamms Verifing...2 of the globals ive seen so far bring this N of PR and east of the Bahamas..


Quite an impressive ridge keeping pace with the disturbance to the north. Remember that the globals were turning Dean across the NE Caribbean and taking it toward the east U.S. coast for a while. They didn't have a good handle on the ridge north of Dean, probably because of a general lack of good upper-air data in the central Atlantic. So I wouldn't rule out a west or just south of west track. I notice that the GFS indicates the 850mb vorticity center at 10N as of 12z today then almost immediately jumps it up to 15N (by this evening). I doubt that the disturbance will jump to 15N tonight, so the GFS's projection of its path is highly suspect.

That said, doesn't look impressive to me at all on satellite, but it could develop in a few days.
Last edited by wxman57 on Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139067
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 94L in Central Atlantic-Discussions-Analysis-Imagery

#13 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:08 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#14 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:17 am

Yeah the ridge is quite strong to its north though the GFS does weaken it a touch by 48hrs which would probably suggest a WNW type track to ermge after then into the southern Caribbean.
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1787
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm
Location: Orlando

Re:

#15 Postby otowntiger » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:22 am

Derek Ortt wrote:conditions are quite favorable for rapikd intensification if this ever comes together


I guess this is somewhat of a philosophical question, but if the conditions truly are quite favorable for rapid intensification, why isn't it intensifying now? It probably is because we still don't have a good handle on intensity forecasts, because based on all we know, the conditions are favorable, but something unknown is prohibiting it, right?
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 48
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re: Re:

#16 Postby skysummit » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:23 am

otowntiger wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:conditions are quite favorable for rapikd intensification if this ever comes together


I guess this is somewhat of a philosophical question, but if the conditions truly are quite favorable for rapid intensification, why isn't it intensifying now? It probably is because we still don't have a good handle on intensity forecasts, because based on all we know, the conditions are favorable, but something unknown is prohibiting it, right?


Note Ortt's last words...."if this ever comes together". That's why....it's not yet together yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
bayoubebe
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: NOLA

#17 Postby bayoubebe » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:25 am

I don't like the discussion about something forming in the gulf this weekend. That would totally ruin our beach plans, and ruin many people's Labor Day plans.

Stay out the gulf bad weather!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Meso
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1608
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

#18 Postby Meso » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:25 am

Waves take longer to organize since they need to have certain characteristics,which they take longer to aquire than it does for a system that already has a LLC and is organizing to intensify
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Invest 94L in Central Atlantic-Discussions-Analysis-Imagery

#19 Postby gatorcane » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:26 am

You can see here why WxMan and Derek suspect a possible path into South America.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 48
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#20 Postby skysummit » Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:33 am

EUMETSAT at 1300:
Image

HERE
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests