TS FELIX: RECON Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Lowpressure
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2032
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion

#41 Postby Lowpressure » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:26 pm

Yes, I know. I was just saying that unfortunately for SA at some point the graphic will be correct. Kinda like the stopped clock.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#42 Postby x-y-no » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:27 pm

They're criss-crossing around trying to fix a center.

Looks like a pretty broad, loose circulation still - but closed nonetheless.

Deserves to be upgraded to TD in my opinion.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Re:

#43 Postby Chacor » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:28 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:Accuweather is becoming the JTWC of the Atlantic. Unfortunately the JTWC does a much better job. Nevertheless, nothing says Accuweather can't do it, or you, or me.


The JTWC is semi-official (best described as a #2 source - JMA is the official source) being a NOAA agency.


JTWC is a DOD agency, not an NOAA/DOC one.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lowpressure
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2032
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion

#44 Postby Lowpressure » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:54 pm

System not very impressive at all- to this point- per hunter. Minimal TD, with good potential down the road. IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion

#45 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:56 pm

Have the found any NW winds? There was a ship report from ELQQ4 of NW 22mph and 1009.5mb, so unless that ob doesn't pass QC. This looks like at 25kt TD at best, so far.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion

#46 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:58 pm

Thunder44 wrote:Have the found any NW winds? There was a ship report from ELQQ4 of NW 22mph and 1009.5mb, so unless that ob doesn't pass QC. This looks like at 25kt TD at best, so far.


Yes they did when they did the first pass of the center (albeit very briefly).
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion

#47 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:15 pm

They are flying around 400m meters so standard reduction is 80%. 29kts is about 23kts at the surface.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#48 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:22 pm

Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#49 Postby wxman57 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:26 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs


I only listen to TWC - "The Hurricane Authority".
0 likes   

User avatar
Lowpressure
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2032
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re:

#50 Postby Lowpressure » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:28 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs


Totally agree Derek!
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 37092
Age: 35
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Re:

#51 Postby Brent » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:32 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs


I only listen to TWC - "The Hurricane Authority".


:roflmao:

I had to rely on them for a couple of days during Dean due to a major internet outage, and the frequent mistakes they made were laughable. I can't even remember them all now but I know one time Dean was supposedly moving east. :P When it was a Cat 4 east of Jamaica still it was declared one of the strongest hurricanes ever. :roll:
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#52 Postby dwg71 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:34 pm

94L is not looking that great at the moment, warming cloud tops (expected at this time of day), i dont really see the need to issue and upgrade at 5PM.
Maybe at 11PM if convection persists around a center.
0 likes   

HenkL
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2401
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:33 pm
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion

#53 Postby HenkL » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:47 pm

NOUS42 KNHC 311430
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1030 AM EDT FRI 31 AUGUST 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 01/1100Z TO 02/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-099

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (LESSER ANTILLES)
FLIGHT ONE
A. 02/0000Z
B. NOAA2 0306A CYCLONE
C. 01/2000Z
D. 13.0N 67.5W
E. 01/2100Z TO 02/0300Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

FLIGHT TWO
A. 02/0600Z
B. AFXXX 0406A CYCLONE
C. 02/0400Z
D. 13.2N 69.2W
E. 02/0500Z TO 02/0830Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

FLIGHT THREE
A. 02/1200Z
B. NOAA3 0506A CYCLONE
C. 02/0800Z
D. 13.5N 71.0W
E. 02/0930Z TO 02/1430Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 12 HRLY FIXES.
P-3 DOPPLER RADAR MISSIONS EVERY 12 HRS

II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
JWP


The flight numbers are nn06A.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion

#54 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:48 pm

HenkL wrote:
NOUS42 KNHC 311430
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1030 AM EDT FRI 31 AUGUST 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 01/1100Z TO 02/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-099

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (LESSER ANTILLES)
FLIGHT ONE
A. 02/0000Z
B. NOAA2 0306A CYCLONE
C. 01/2000Z
D. 13.0N 67.5W
E. 01/2100Z TO 02/0300Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

FLIGHT TWO
A. 02/0600Z
B. AFXXX 0406A CYCLONE
C. 02/0400Z
D. 13.2N 69.2W
E. 02/0500Z TO 02/0830Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

FLIGHT THREE
A. 02/1200Z
B. NOAA3 0506A CYCLONE
C. 02/0800Z
D. 13.5N 71.0W
E. 02/0930Z TO 02/1430Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 12 HRLY FIXES.
P-3 DOPPLER RADAR MISSIONS EVERY 12 HRS

II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
JWP


The flight numbers are nn06A.


Interesting, first sign of an upgrade?
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re:

#55 Postby x-y-no » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:52 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs


Absolutely agree. First and foremost, you consistently put out verifiable forecast tracks. Accuweather has only very rarely and sporadically issued verifiable forecasts - preferring to speak in generalities and produce vague and sometimes (as today) very inaccurate graphics.

BTW, over 4 hours and counting (and a recon vortex message saying 1009mb) and Accuweather still says this has a pressure of 988mb.
0 likes   

User avatar
oyster_reef
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Re:

#56 Postby oyster_reef » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:56 pm

x-y-no wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs


Absolutely agree. First and foremost, you consistently put out verifiable forecast tracks. Accuweather has only very rarely and sporadically issued verifiable forecasts - preferring to speak in generalities and produce vague and sometimes (as today) very inaccurate graphics.

BTW, over 4 hours and counting (and a recon vortex message saying 1009mb) and Accuweather still says this has a pressure of 988mb.



but all in all, they are the best recognized and most profitable weather service in the open marktet. They are a business and they have done that well.

McDonalds doesn't make the best burger either. They do make money.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Re:

#57 Postby x-y-no » Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:09 pm

oyster_reef wrote:but all in all, they are the best recognized and most profitable weather service in the open marktet. They are a business and they have done that well.

McDonalds doesn't make the best burger either. They do make money.



True, but you don't see McDonalds trash-talking Bobby Flay about the quality of his burgers.

If I hear one word of boasting about how they called this TD 6 hours before NHC did, I'm going to be absolutely outraged.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#58 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:12 pm

besides, NHC called this TD 6 very early today... they have already issued 3 forecasts on this system. So no, Accuwx did NOT call this before NHC
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139062
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#59 Postby cycloneye » Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:13 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:besides, NHC called this TD 6 very early today... they have already issued 3 forecasts on this system. So no, Accuwx did NOT call this before NHC


Those are not for public comsumption right?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19165
Age: 60
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Re:

#60 Postby tolakram » Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:16 pm

cycloneye wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:besides, NHC called this TD 6 very early today... they have already issued 3 forecasts on this system. So no, Accuwx did NOT call this before NHC


Those are not for public comsumption right?


How can a government agency like NHC produce forecasts that aren't for public consumption? Is there an explanation of this somewhere?
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests