question for earthquakes

[neiseti]

Hi everyone,

I wanna ask if it is possible that the activity of an undersea(deepsea) volcano ( or any other deep sea earthquakes) can cause any other seismic activity in another place on the globe?
I have observed also that after a geomagnetic storm ( especially the big ones) cause more frequent seismic activity. Is there any correlation between the weather in space and the core of the earth or the other layers that might influence the weather patterns on the surface or under the surface of the earth?

Are there any assumptions or research from the scientists yet?

Maria

[gigabite]

The term is "solar jerk" is on a similar note has to do with the currently increasing rate of natural disasters. There is no institution in place that will be able to financially cope with a quadrupling of this type of event. I am sure you haven’t heard of the phenomena. It is similar to the “slingshot effect” that NASA scientist use to limit the fuel requirement of an interplanetary spacecraft craft. In this case "solar jerk" is being caused by the transit of Jupiter on its way to its closest approach with Sun.

The pass of Jupiter next year will be the closest in more than a century, by the Mayan account it will be 3000 years before it happens again. The fact is this that the 2nd derivative winter/summer earth sun distance will increase by 400 percent over average. There is no fluffy science to this. It is a mathematical fact. Check with the U.S. Naval Observatory. The repercussions of this event could last as long as 30 years or 3 business cycles. The current events will be foot notes to the next two years.

http://www.crawfordperspectives.com/Fai ... namics.htm

If you dial in the month, day, year, and zulu time of almost any event you will note some sort of field multiplying geometry. The Moon always acts as the power factor. Because the Earth is so small alignments rarely strike the planet, but for the next few years when they do they do they will be kickers.

http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar

[somethingfunny]

The term is "solar jerk" is on a similar note has to do with the currently increasing rate of natural disasters. There is no institution in place that will be able to financially cope with a quadrupling of this type of event. I am sure you haven’t heard of the phenomena. It is similar to the “slingshot effect” that NASA scientist use to limit the fuel requirement of an interplanetary spacecraft craft. In this case "solar jerk" is being caused by the transit of Jupiter on its way to its closest approach with Sun.

The pass of Jupiter next year will be the closest in more than a century, by the Mayan account it will be 3000 years before it happens again. The fact is this that the 2nd derivative winter/summer earth sun distance will increase by 400 percent over average. There is no fluffy science to this. It is a mathematical fact. Check with the U.S. Naval Observatory. The repercussions of this event could last as long as 30 years or 3 business cycles. The current events will be foot notes to the next two years.

http://www.crawfordperspectives.com/Fai ... namics.htm

If you dial in the month, day, year, and zulu time of almost any event you will note some sort of field multiplying geometry. The Moon always acts as the power factor. Because the Earth is so small alignments rarely strike the planet, but for the next few years when they do they do they will be kickers.

http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar

So the 2nd derivative winter/summer earth-sun distance will increase by 400%. What effect would that have?

[gigabite]

The shift will increase the probability of global low pressure, more precipitation, more earthquakes, but not a increased percentage of stronger quakes, just more quakes. KEY WORD: earthquake weather.

The closest approach of Jupiter to the sun is the same as the closest approach of Earth to Jupiter. Then there is the alignment on 12-12-12. That is not the same as the 12-21-12 thing. There is an actual planetary alignment. I don't know if the galactic black hole even matters if it is true.

Please understand that that is only a 5 earth diameter orbital shift. It is just that it is an abrupt shift.

[Aslkahuna]

Jupiter's closest approaches to the Earth occur when Jupiter is in opposition to the Sun in Earth's sky (or when Earth passes by the planet) In 2012, Jupiter will be in Pisces which means opposition in September not December. Closest approaches to the Sun occur when the Planet is at perihelion. It's not a "jerk" in this instances but just that the perihelion distances is somewhat closer to the Sun. Jupiter is in orbital resonance with Saturn so there is an oscillation of Jupiter's distance from the Sun. In December 2012, Earth will be approaching 90° ahead of Jupiter as seen in the orbital planes of both planets.

Steve

[gigabite]

Thank you for the clarification.

2012 December 3 - Jupiter at Opposition. The giant planet will be at its closest approach to Earth. This is the best time to view and photograph Jupiter and its moons.

http://www.seasky.org/astronomy/astrono ... _2012.html

... also the alignment 12-12-12 is along a plane that does not include the Sun. I have observed that the planetary force vectors sum just like any other coplanar force vector. The Sun doesn't necessarily have to be in the alignment for the earthquake frequency to crank up.

The modulus of compression seems to be a factor of the Earth Sun distance year over year. That is in January the Earth being closer to the Sun than in July is not as important to Earthquake Frequency as the relative distance at the same time last year. Suggesting that a disturbance of the laminar flow of a hot basaltic lava may be more likely when local Atmospheric pressures reach an abrupt threshold (a thump), rather than a sudden displacement of a fault by a force vector from space at a given instance (not a crack).

... and since the alignment does not include the Sun the suggestions that a solar flare at or near the alignment seem as likely as any other time during the Solar Maximum.

[Aslkahuna]

My bad on the opposition date, it's later this year than I thought. Actually, the Sun will be in close alignment in 2012 since oppostion is an alignment with the Sun and Planet on opposite sides of Earth and a week later is not that much of a difference in the lineup. Jupiter is in a Laplacian resonance of 5:2 with Saturn and both planets oscillate about a mean distance with a 1000 year period. The closer approach to Earth results from the minimum distance occurring with the Planet in a perihelic opposition. However, it's doubtful that the close approach to the Sun is any different than any before in the past millenia. The last perihelic and nearly as close approach (5 Earth Diameters= approx one Jupiter radius) occurred around 1998.

Steve

[gigabite]

Yea well, it is sooner than we thought & it looks like a twofer.
.................................AU's
***2009-Aug-15 00:00 4.02782878958481
2010-Sep-21 00:00 3.95393068590782
*2011-Oct-28 00:00 3.96975886899916
***2012-Dec-02 00:00 4.06855623308498
*****2014-Jan-05 00:00 4.21043847636425

http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi#results