Tropical Storm Edouard recon discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8344
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: 91L recon discussion

#21 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:27 pm

How do you do a table here? Post data in a table format?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#22 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:42 pm

Code: Select all

126
NOUS42 KNHC 031530 COR
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1130 AM EDT SUN 03 AUGUST 2008
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
         VALID 04/1100Z TO 05/1100Z AUGUST 2008
         TCPOD NUMBER.....08-064

I.  ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
    1. SUSPECT AREA --GULF OF MEXICO
       FLIGHT ONE  --TEAL 70      FLIGHT TWO  --TEAL 71
       A. 04/1800Z-05/0000Z       A. 05/0600Z-1200Z
       B. AFXXX 0305A CYCLONE     B. AFXXX 0405A CYCLONE
       C. 04/1600Z                C. 05/0400Z
       D. 28.3N 91.2W             D. 29.0N 93.5W
       E. 04/1700 TO 05/0000Z     E. 05/0500 TO 1200Z
       F. SFC TO 10,000FT         F. SFC TO 10,000FT
     CORRECTED ITEM D IN FLIGHT ONE, FLIGHT TWO NO CHANGE

    2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 6 HRLY FIXES.

11. PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
    1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
    2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK.....NEGATIVE.
                     WVW
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#23 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:25 pm

It looks like the winds are shifting (further north) to the E and ENE per latest recon headings...

Is my interpretation correct?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139327
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 91L recon discussion

#24 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:38 pm

Lowest pressure 1007.5 mbs.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#25 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:39 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:It looks like the winds are shifting (further north) to the E and ENE per latest recon headings...

Is my interpretation correct?


Yep. East wind on the north side of the circulation. We need west and south winds to close it.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#26 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:46 pm

Looks like we have TD5.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re:

#27 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:47 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Looks like we have TD5.


If it has a name, it would be Edouard.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#28 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:48 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Looks like we have TD5.


If it has a name, it would be Edouard.


Yep but it only seems to support 30 kt winds right now.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#29 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:49 pm

this is the center pass from recon .. very clear evidence of a closed surface low..

193330 2814N 08801W 9767 00270 0074 +228 +210 081014 015 005 003 00
193400 2812N 08801W 9768 00267 0072 +230 +210 062011 013 999 999 03
193430 2811N 08800W 9777 00259 0072 +230 +210 067009 010 004 001 03
193500 2811N 08759W 9764 00271 0072 +229 +210 073009 011 004 001 00
193530 2810N 08757W 9767 00268 0072 +223 +210 076006 009 002 002 00
193600 2809N 08756W 9780 00258 0073 +227 +210 097004 004 000 003 03
193630 2808N 08755W 9762 00274 0074 +224 +210 047003 003 000 003 03
193700 2807N 08755W 9772 00264 0073 +226 +210 336006 008 000 003 00
193730 2805N 08754W 9770 00267 0074 +223 +210 301016 021 012 004 00
193800 2803N 08753W 9775 00265 0076 +222 +210 287023 024 017 003 0
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
El Nino
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 454
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Lima - Miraflores (Peru)
Contact:

Re: 91L recon discussion

#30 Postby El Nino » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:49 pm

Westely wind and 30 kts according to last RECON series ? (I´m trying to read this for the 1st time)

If yes, we have a TD.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#31 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:50 pm

It's Edouard, in my (personal) view. Earlier, data from recon supported ~35 kt 1-min surface winds in SE quadrant. I'm not even including the SFMR readings. We have the corrobating WSW and W winds via reconnaissance and buoy data, which supports a closed LLC in light of all available information. We should see an upgrade to TD/TS status from the NHC today. Regardless, this system is definitely not deepening rapidly, contrary to the assessments from some members.
Last edited by MiamiensisWx on Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Re:

#32 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:51 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Yep but it only seems to support 30 kt winds right now.


Yeah, I think a TD is in the order.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8344
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: 91L recon discussion

#33 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:52 pm

Estimated Surface Wind (30 sec. Avg.)
Using Estimated Reduction Factor 2
6.1 knots (~ 30.0 mph)
44.4 knots (~ 51.1 mph)Tropical Storm
40.7 knots (~ 46.8 mph)Tropical Storm
37.0 knots (~ 42.5 mph)Tropical Storm

These were not suspect areas in the last surface obs.
0 likes   

hwego7

#34 Postby hwego7 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:56 pm

The NHC still has the right to view the SFMR readings as unrepresentative of the storms true intensity, if they chose to.
0 likes   

stevetampa33614

Re: 91L recon discussion

#35 Postby stevetampa33614 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:00 pm

Straight to minumum TS upgrade in order?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#36 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:01 pm

Image
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

#37 Postby pojo » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:42 pm

I guess we'll see what this system is going to do during our overnight
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#38 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:46 pm

pojo wrote:I guess we'll see what this system is going to do during our overnight


If it doesn't strengthen, will you still fly at 200m during night?
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Re:

#39 Postby pojo » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:47 pm

RL3AO wrote:
pojo wrote:I guess we'll see what this system is going to do during our overnight


If it doesn't strengthen, will you still fly at 200m during night?


we may go higher because of oil rigs.... maybe 300m... our max altitude on TD/LLI is 500m
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Tropical Depression Five recon discussion

#40 Postby Recurve » Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:09 pm

Man, that sounds looooowwwww. Under 1,000 feet the whole time? Or is that the stupidest question ever.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests