Arthur's remnents near the BOC

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: Arthur's remnents near the BOC

#721 Postby lrak » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:30 pm

I'm one of those real silly guys :D who also loves more than anything well almost anything is surfing, so you guys are my guide during the season. I mean check out what a good swell can produce along the TX coast.. http://www.seagypsysphotographs.com/stormswells.htm I'm not a Spicoli from Ridge Mount High, now I'm giving away my age, but a broker/accountant that is currently studing other things, doesn't have much time for the weather studies. :D

We call those pictures "Coasta for FREE" no plane fare.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: Arthur's remnents near the BOC

#722 Postby tailgater » Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:30 am

Category 5 wrote:Just trying to steer you in the right direction here. Theres nothing left to watch really. All thats left to do is wait for the next one. Enjoy the lulls while they last.

Thanks, but I'll do my own steering. And as I said before I'll watch WHATEVER I want to. Can we leave it at that, or do you still wish to try and tell me what to watch.
Last edited by tailgater on Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

Re: Arthur's remnents near the BOC

#723 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:17 am

I will admit that the chances are very low as of this time. 91E 'energy' is pulling northeastward and should not be there for a development of a new Low...Also southly wind shear appears to be strengthing, so pretty much the chances are about 2% for something to development. I now believe that this maybe dead. But you never know what tomarrow has in store.
0 likes   

StormspinnerD2

#724 Postby StormspinnerD2 » Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:20 am

Finally gone from NRL.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4929
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#725 Postby Nimbus » Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:37 am

The surface pressure near buoy 42055 is still yoyoing down below 1007 mb and there is a convection flare in the area. I would expect a "slow development is possible as conditions became more favorable" type statement from the NHC.

Oil prices seem to be at the bottom of their trading range, I wonder if the speculators are good weather forecasters?
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re:

#726 Postby Thunder44 » Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:18 am

Nimbus wrote:The surface pressure near buoy 42055 is still yoyoing down below 1007 mb and there is a convection flare in the area. I would expect a "slow development is possible as conditions became more favorable" type statement from the NHC.

Oil prices seem to be at the bottom of their trading range, I wonder if the speculators are good weather forecasters?


Nope, they are still saying no tropical cylcone formation is expected. The convection doesn't look very impressive to me and looks be under high shear from the north or northwest. I don't think we will see development here over the next few days.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#727 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:23 am

We must remember that this is June. Development chances are always low except in some cases.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#728 Postby Chacor » Thu Jun 05, 2008 8:21 am

Since it's off NRL, shouldn't this thread now be archived? I assume further discussion can take place in Talkin' Tropics as this is no longer considered active.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests