ATL Ex. INVEST 92L: Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#41 Postby Sanibel » Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:42 pm

There must be something there:


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9863
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#42 Postby Blown Away » Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:53 pm

Image
IR Loop: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-avn.html
92L still has a healthy LLC, you can see the rotation on IR loop. A small burst of convection along the SE side of the LLC, but most of the deep convection is removed to the SE.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#43 Postby HURAKAN » Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:59 pm

AL, 92, 2008091400, , BEST, 0, 160N, 461W, 25, 1009,

Image
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#44 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:14 pm

Stormcenter wrote:Thank goodness it's September 13th and not August 13th.

Numerous Cape Verde TCs have formed on this date (or during the succeeding days); in fact, several examples were active on this date (or later) and affected the CONUS, including 1926 #6, 1928 #4, 1938 #4, 1944 #10, 1947 #4, Georges 1998, Ivan 2004, and others. The risk of landfalling Cape Verde TCs in the CONUS decreases substantially after September 20, so we have one remaining week prior to the annual reduction of the probabilities of a "long track" hit. It is noted that Georges affected Mississippi on September 28. Regardless, 92L will likely not develop because of the strong UL wind vectors (and a northwesterly jet max) from an adjacent TUTT to the NNW.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#45 Postby Sanibel » Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:26 pm

Well let it lose that convection burst first before writing it off.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9863
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#46 Postby Blown Away » Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:36 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:Thank goodness it's September 13th and not August 13th.

Numerous Cape Verde TCs have formed on this date (or during the succeeding days); in fact, several examples were active on this date (or later) and affected the CONUS, including 1926 #6, 1928 #4, 1938 #4, 1944 #10, 1947 #4, Georges 1998, Ivan 2004, and others. The risk of landfalling Cape Verde TCs in the CONUS decreases substantially after September 20, so we have one remaining week prior to the annual reduction of the probabilities of a "long track" hit. It is noted that Georges affected Mississippi on September 28. Regardless, 92L will likely not develop because of the strong UL wind vectors (and a northwesterly jet max) from an adjacent TUTT to the NNW.


Hebert Box for all the SFL/Keys storms.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#47 Postby HURAKAN » Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:30 pm

13/2345 UTC 16.0N 46.0W T1.5/1.5 92L -- Atlantic Ocean
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneFreak
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:37 pm
Location: Boca Raton,Florida

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#48 Postby HurricaneFreak » Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:39 pm

Okay well it seems the shear is keeping the conection to the east of the LLC but shear is expected to decrese a little bit and if the LLC doesn't move away so fast then the convection could have a chance to wrap around the circulation if convection lives for next few days.Then if it goes under the ridge it could pass into the "Herbert Box" which is a few hundred miles WNW of Invest 92L then it would not be a fish storm.It could start to strengthen and then move on somewhere to northern Cuba,or east coast of Florida.Thats my thought of what could happen IF the invest 92L keeps a strong convection status and survives shear.
A lot of IFS in this situation.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#49 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:54 pm

HURAKAN wrote:13/2345 UTC 16.0N 46.0W T1.5/1.5 92L -- Atlantic Ocean


Quite impressive...just needs more in other parts of the circulation.
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#50 Postby shah8 » Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:54 pm

I wouldn't have thought that blob was a 1.5.

Not good news. We kinda sorta need a break, and this hurricane enthusiast needs sleep.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1667
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#51 Postby bob rulz » Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:29 am

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:Thank goodness it's September 13th and not August 13th.

Numerous Cape Verde TCs have formed on this date (or during the succeeding days); in fact, several examples were active on this date (or later) and affected the CONUS, including 1926 #6, 1928 #4, 1938 #4, 1944 #10, 1947 #4, Georges 1998, Ivan 2004, and others. The risk of landfalling Cape Verde TCs in the CONUS decreases substantially after September 20, so we have one remaining week prior to the annual reduction of the probabilities of a "long track" hit. It is noted that Georges affected Mississippi on September 28. Regardless, 92L will likely not develop because of the strong UL wind vectors (and a northwesterly jet max) from an adjacent TUTT to the NNW.


Wow, I hope we never see another storm that takes the path of that 1947 #4! :eek:

NHC doesn't seem too enthusiastic about this disturbance.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31390
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#52 Postby KWT » Sun Sep 14, 2008 5:04 am

I personally don't think this is very likely to develop but we shall see!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139144
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#53 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 14, 2008 6:57 am

Nothing new:

ABNT20 KNHC 141143
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 AM EDT SUN SEP 14 2008

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER HAS ISSUED ITS LAST ADVISORY ON
TROPICAL DEPRESSION IKE...WHICH IS CURRENTLY MERGING WITH A FRONTAL
ZONE IN SOUTHEASTERN MISSOURI. FUTURE ADVISORIES ON THE
EXTRATROPICAL REMNANTS OF IKE WILL BE ISSUED BY THE
HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER IN WASHINGTON DC.

:rarrow: A TROPICAL WAVE LOCATED ABOUT 800 MILES EAST OF THE LEEWARD ISLANDS
IS PRODUCING DISORGANIZED SHOWER ACTIVITY AS IT MOVES
WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT ABOUT 15 MPH. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT OF
THIS SYSTEM DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS APPEARS UNLIKELY DUE TO
STRONG UPPER-LEVEL WINDS.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER BEVEN/FRANKLIN
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9863
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#54 Postby Blown Away » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:34 am

The LLC not as visible as yesterday, but is still near 16.5N/50W moving just N of due W. No NW movement like the models show.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#55 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:26 am

I noticed models were wrong on movement too. Big ULL descending down on it. Almost stripped. If it makes it past it might rebound.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#56 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:33 am

Sanibel wrote:I noticed models were wrong on movement too. Big ULL descending down on it. Almost stripped. If it makes it past it might rebound.


It may also develop a new center in the convection...
0 likes   

User avatar
MHurricanes
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 102
Age: 72
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#57 Postby MHurricanes » Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:46 am

Sanibel wrote:I noticed models were wrong on movement too. Big ULL descending down on it. Almost stripped. If it makes it past it might rebound.


If this holds together, where could we possibly see it (longitude/lattitude) organizing into a tropical depression?

- MHurricanes
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139144
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL INVEST 92L: Discussion

#58 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:01 am

92L has been deactivated.

BEGIN
NHC
invest_DEACTIVATE_al922008.ren
FSTDA
R
U
040
010
0000
200809141336
NONE
NOTIFY=ATRP
END

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/



The thread is moved to Talking Tropics forum.If they reactivate this system as a invest,then the thread will be back at Active Storms forum.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL Ex INVEST 92L: Discussion

#59 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:33 pm

Still there. Waiting to see if it survives the ULL.
0 likes   

chrisnnavarre
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:52 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL Ex INVEST 92L: Discussion

#60 Postby chrisnnavarre » Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:08 pm

Sure looks it's still there to me and maybe just a little convection starting to approach the LLC.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests