ATL: Marco : Tropical Depression - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#161 Postby JonathanBelles » Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:21 am

How do you have 65mph winds in an area 10 miles wide of 40mph?
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#162 Postby Chacor » Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:43 am

Image

That's some pretty deep convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re:

#163 Postby Category 5 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:03 am

Chacor wrote:Image

That's some pretty deep convection.


It will be a rough 10 minutes wherever this makes landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#164 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:06 am

Image

Unfortunately we will never know exactly what was its real intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#165 Postby Chacor » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:19 am

With TS-force wind radii of only 10 nm in all quadrants, the area of TS-force winds in Marco is only 314 sq nm or 416 square miles.

To put this into perspective, Jacksonville is 885 sq mi big, more than double that.
0 likes   

User avatar
alan1961
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Derby, Derbyshire, England
Contact:

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#166 Postby alan1961 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:38 am

Good job this didn't have more time over water, its really giving it some convection wise just approaching the coast :eek:
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#167 Postby jinftl » Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:14 am

34kt winds extend out 10 miles in each direction.....or a diameter of approx 20 miles....from the center...with the core of strongest winds (50kt) to the NE and SE of the center...this will equate to approx 2-3 hour long event in the areas of the direct path (20-mile wind field, moving 8 miles per hour = 2.5 hours).


TROPICAL STORM CENTER LOCATED NEAR 20.1N 96.1W AT 07/0900Z
POSITION ACCURATE WITHIN 20 NM

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE 998 MB
MAX SUSTAINED WINDS 55 KT WITH GUSTS TO 65 KT.
50 KT....... 5NE 5SE 0SW 0NW.
34 KT....... 10NE 10SE 10SW 10NW.


fact789 wrote:How do you have 65mph winds in an area 10 miles wide of 40mph?
Last edited by jinftl on Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#168 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:15 am

Image

Little Marco wants to grow up!
0 likes   

User avatar
Epsilon_Fan
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#169 Postby Epsilon_Fan » Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:22 am

it looks to be "expanding" as it approaches the coast, if you can say that :) The blob of thunderstorms to the east was bigger for a little while
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#170 Postby Category 5 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:48 am

Severe thunderstorm warning for the immediate coast. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#171 Postby wxman57 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:31 am

I can no longer see any rotation in visible satellite loops. I think Marco may have lost its LLC overnight. Outflow boundaries are pushing away from the center in the southern half of the storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3872
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: West Melbourne, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#172 Postby AJC3 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:42 am

Although not a named storm, TD #4 from 2000, which formed just off of our coast was pretty tiny as well.

Image
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#173 Postby Sanibel » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:52 am

We should get a pressure reading on landfall. Must have dropped under 998 during that burst. Storm was changing gears and would have gotten stronger with more Gulf ahead if it had it.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#174 Postby wxman57 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:55 am

Sanibel wrote:We should get a pressure reading on landfall. Must have dropped under 998 during that burst. Storm was changing gears and would have gotten stronger with more Gulf ahead if it had it.


There won't be any pressure reading on landfall as there are no instruments in its path. Center, if there is one (and I doubt it) is moving ashore now. No recon today - at least no recon flying into where any center might be. It's too late.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#175 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:58 am

wxman57 wrote:
Sanibel wrote:We should get a pressure reading on landfall. Must have dropped under 998 during that burst. Storm was changing gears and would have gotten stronger with more Gulf ahead if it had it.


There won't be any pressure reading on landfall as there are no instruments in its path. Center, if there is one (and I doubt it) is moving ashore now. No recon today - at least no recon flying into where any center might be. It's too late.


Never fear, GFS, Euro and Canadian all agree you'll have something else to track this time next week.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139069
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Marco : Tropical Storm - Discussion

#176 Postby cycloneye » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:43 am

No need for a plane to go.

320
WTNT33 KNHC 071442
TCPAT3
BULLETIN
TROPICAL STORM MARCO ADVISORY NUMBER 5
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL AL132008
1000 AM CDT TUE OCT 07 2008

...MARCO MAKES LANDFALL ON THE COAST OF MEXICO...

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MI ... 1442.shtml
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#177 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:54 am

My guess is 60 kt for the landfall intensity based on the improved cloud deck. We'll never know for sure since that would be in one small area.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139069
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#178 Postby cycloneye » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 am

CrazyC83 wrote:My guess is 60 kt for the landfall intensity based on the improved cloud deck. We'll never know for sure since that would be in one small area.


Best Track at Post Analysis will confirm or not what you say about intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#179 Postby Chacor » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:57 am

Convection warmed towards landfall so I do not buy intensification.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#180 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:58 am

cycloneye wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:My guess is 60 kt for the landfall intensity based on the improved cloud deck. We'll never know for sure since that would be in one small area.


Best Track at Post Analysis will confirm or not what you say about intensity.


It's almost impossible to tell though. Dvorak is useless with such a tiny storm, so we pretty much have to guess based on yesterday's Recon extrapolated.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 136 guests