ATL : INVEST 94L

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tropicana
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 6:48 pm
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#21 Postby tropicana » Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:07 pm

i refuse to get excited for any more false starts. :)

-justin-
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#22 Postby Sanibel » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:13 pm

Maybe this storm will break the ice.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 477
Age: 36
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Isle Of lewis scotland

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#23 Postby Cookie » Sat Jul 04, 2009 5:46 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:I think they're bored.

Just an opinion...


post of the month :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
littlevince
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:45 am
Location: Portugal

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#24 Postby littlevince » Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:20 pm

I really don't understand the "bored" stuff.
This was a nice looking system all night:

Image

In the morning, visible (9z) looked far away for a "bored" stuff:

Image

Water in the region are warmer than usual. In the 48 hours potential path there are islands where many people live.
What is the surprise or strange think with this Invest ? It's just an invest, a system under investigation.
Was it a wrong decision? I don't think so ! Shear has splitting it apart during the day, ok, but that happens many others times.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#25 Postby wxman57 » Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:37 pm

SSTs in the lower 70s and dropping fast now in its path. From the looks of it on satellite this morning, and from QS data, it would have been classified a TD if it had been any threat to land this morning. But it's now past its peak and weakening.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139165
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#26 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:39 pm

Avila literally says adios to it :)

143
ABNT20 KNHC 042333
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 PM EDT SAT JUL 4 2009

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

THE SHOWER ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A NON-TROPICAL AREA OF LOW
PRESSURE LOCATED ABOUT 800 MILES SOUTHWEST OF THE AZORES HAS BECOME
DISORGANIZED. UPPER-LEVEL WINDS ARE NOT FAVORABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT.
THERE IS A LOW CHANCE...LESS THAN 30 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM
BECOMING A TROPICAL OR SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48
HOURS.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER AVILA
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139165
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#27 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:40 pm

:blowup:

BEGIN
NHC_ATCF
invest_DEACTIVATE_al942009.ren
FSTDA
R
U
040
010
0000
200907042354
NONE
NOTIFY=ATRP
END

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/ ... 942009.ren
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 40
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re:

#28 Postby thetruesms » Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:33 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image
:lol: It's funny because it's true.

But srsly, I agree with wxman, littlevince, and whoever else was of similar opinion that I'm not mentioning - there were definitely some good reasons to keep a dedicated eye on this. Did it have a real great shot? No, but just imagine the backlash the other way if conditions became magically favorable and it caught everyone with their pants down. It's not like they created a situation where people felt obligated to throw up TS warnings on a moment's notice - it was just an invest.

Why did that last sentence remind me of Clerks? Hey, try not to issue any invests on your way through the parking lot! :oops:
0 likes   

User avatar
littlevince
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:45 am
Location: Portugal

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#29 Postby littlevince » Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:40 am

94L was discontinued, please correct if I'm wrong, but maybe is not dead yet, I think it established a new center:

Image



ASCAT (23:53z)

Image


Last visible (10:45z)
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
littlevince
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:45 am
Location: Portugal

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#30 Postby littlevince » Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:35 pm

Image

Image
Last edited by littlevince on Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139165
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#31 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:38 pm

:uarrow: That is the 94E best track data not for 94L.
0 likes   

User avatar
littlevince
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:45 am
Location: Portugal

Re: ATL : INVEST 94L

#32 Postby littlevince » Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:40 pm

cycloneye wrote::uarrow: That is the 94E best track data not for 94L.


Sorry. My mistake. I removed it.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#33 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 05, 2009 4:53 pm

Image

Ex. 94L is giving us another chance to have something to watch as the lull continues.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 32
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

#34 Postby Cyclone1 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 5:21 pm

Looks much better than it did.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#35 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:34 pm

Image

Image

I don't know why the NHC didn't mention it in the TWO.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#36 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:59 pm

we also didn't mention it either in the nwhhc outlook
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#37 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:06 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#38 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:49 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#39 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:58 pm

Image

Still looks good.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#40 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:28 am

well considering that convection has wrapped completely around the center .. and on the latest IR the center is very evident with cooler cloud tops surrounding a slightly warm Center ( not an eye ).. i would say that this is at the moment our first named system .. lol but hey who am i to say.. lol

if convection re-fires with this present organization the NHC will have to upgrade it..
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests