FrontRunner wrote:Don't forget that those "high", "moderate", and "low" labels correspond to subjectively determined quantitative probabilities of development. For a brief time this had a 30%-50% chance of development - hardly that high. And this still corresponds to saying that, more likely than not, there won't be development within the following 48 hours.
I know what the probabilities mean. However, I'm saying that there was no evidence that this disturbance ever had a development chance above 30%. It was in the process of weakening when the development chance was increased to "moderate".