ATL: NATE - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tobol.7uno
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 287
Age: 30
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: DeBary, Fl
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#121 Postby tobol.7uno » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:47 pm

Another view of all the models including GFS Ensemble from Google Earth. I think this is a Florida storm! Sorry Texas :(
I am generally excluding the models that go southwest into the Pacific as I see these solutions very unlikely.
Image
0 likes   
My Tropical Weather Website: http://tropwx.com/
I do link exchange, so if you have a website we can share each others links.

jeff
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#122 Postby jeff » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:55 pm

Whatever the track do not bring us any wind in TX. I stopped forecasting rain a month ago...it just is not going to rain...but do NOT let the winds blow. It is like California and the Santa Ana's here with Lee and the damage has been done. I greatly fear the fall cold fronts, we are going to burn and burn badly.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

#123 Postby BigA » Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:57 pm

00Z SREF (Short Range Ensemble forecast): North/northeast into central GOM in 87 hours

00Z NAM: Northwest/NNW toward Mexico at 84 hours, offshore between Tampico and Brownsville.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4018
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#124 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:00 pm

jeff wrote:Whatever the track do not bring us any wind in TX. I stopped forecasting rain a month ago...it just is not going to rain...but do NOT let the winds blow. It is like California and the Santa Ana's here with Lee and the damage has been done. I greatly fear the fall cold fronts, we are going to burn and burn badly.


Jeff is it going to rain at all this month? I agree with you about every cold front that comes through this year will be dry and bring an extreme fire danger to us. Are you guys depressed like me?
0 likes   

User avatar
tobol.7uno
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 287
Age: 30
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: DeBary, Fl
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#125 Postby tobol.7uno » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:01 pm

Look at the Sea Surface Temperatures that it has to work with very high, I have also taken a look at the shear and it does not look too bad at the time, but it could increase if the storm moves NE.
SST...
Image
24 hr Shear Tendency...
Image
0 likes   
My Tropical Weather Website: http://tropwx.com/
I do link exchange, so if you have a website we can share each others links.

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4833
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#126 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:03 pm

Although we should be thankful for dry air, as it's kept the systems in check this year, does anyone know why there's so much dry air this year?? It seems like with every storm that's developed so far, I've heard "dry air" this and "dry air" that and it's been mentioned with every single tropical disturbance... I wonder why there's so much dry air in the Gulf/Atlantic this year? What the heck is going on?? This is really strange, but there must be a reason...Any pro mets venture a guess??
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5273
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#127 Postby Ptarmigan » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:24 pm

Storms in the Bay of Campeche tend to spin up quickly because of the curvature of Mexico.
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

#128 Postby psyclone » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:34 pm

the southeastern half of the gulf is juicy with a tight moisture gradient. current dewpoint in tallahassee is 57 while tampa is 76.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

#129 Postby BigA » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:54 pm

Yep, looks like it is starting to spin up. Will be interesting to see what it looks like tomorrow morning, and what recon finds. My gut says west into Mexico, but not sure at all on that.
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re:

#130 Postby psyclone » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:06 pm

BigA wrote:Yep, looks like it is starting to spin up. Will be interesting to see what it looks like tomorrow morning, and what recon finds. My gut says west into Mexico, but not sure at all on that.

i agree with your gut instincts on this. historical precedent is so overwhelming. what happens in the boc stays in the boc. naturally i'm watching for any rule breakers.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#131 Postby Wthrman13 » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:14 pm

BigA wrote:GFS ensembles from the 18Z run: totally different from the operational run



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

I do not understand why ensembles often all vary so much from the operational. Aren't they like the operational, but with slightly different initial conditions? I would expect some to be quite different, but not all different in one direction.


One big reason, I think, is that the ensembles are run at a reduced resolution from the operational deterministic run (unless this has changed recently; I'd have to check to make sure). The operational GFS storm tracks, I've often noticed, are often major "outliers" when compared directly to the corresponding GFS ensemble members. They also, at least for the cases I've looked at, tend to outperform the GFS ensemble members. I confess that I've only really paid attention to a few cases, and the situation could have changed since I last really examined them (i.e. increasing model resolution, etc.). Also, keep in mind that for synoptic scale flow, the differences in resolvability between a typical ensemble member and the deterministic run probably aren't as significant as for smaller scale features such as TC's.
0 likes   

DIwestender
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#132 Postby DIwestender » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:29 pm

Am I wrong or did the latest GFS run head this straight into Mexico again? I am new at this so hoping one of you might check and confirm. Thanks!
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4018
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#133 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:35 pm

DIwestender wrote:Am I wrong or did the latest GFS run head this straight into Mexico again? I am new at this so hoping one of you might check and confirm. Thanks!


You are correct. 0z GFS stays consistent.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#134 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:02 am

IMO, I think this will be a Texas storm and bring tons of rain that will refill every lake we have from here to Dallas..... :lol:

just being positive...
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4018
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#135 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:05 am

Please be right please be right please be right. :lol:
I hope to wake up to some promising news for once. CMC and Euro better be good to Texas tonight. :wink:
Rock, you cantake over the late night model riegns for me tonight bro. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#136 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:11 am

South Texas Storms wrote:Please be right please be right please be right. :lol:
I hope to wake up to some promising news for once. CMC and Euro better be good to Texas tonight. :wink:
Rock, you cantake over the late night model riegns for me tonight bro. :lol:


man I am done for tonight...just finishing up looking at the 0Z's....0z NOGAPS buries this into MX as well...
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4018
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#137 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:12 am

Ah crap. Thanks CMC to sending me off to bed in a wonderful way...it sends it to the NGOM....
0 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2456
Age: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#138 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:17 am

IMO if 96L develops close to the NW Yucatan than odd are it would take the NE option as suggested by the 12zECMWF and 0zCMC but if it were to develop more south than a more WNW heading would be likely like the GFS and NAM are forecasting.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#139 Postby lonelymike » Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:34 am

Doesn't look like CMC does much with the system strengthwise. Until NHC identifies a center these runs don't have much validity IMO.
0 likes   


GO SEMINOLES

bigdan35
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 83
Age: 48
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:56 am
Location: Sarasota Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#140 Postby bigdan35 » Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:41 am

It dont look that bad.

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests