WPAC: SURIGAE - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Cunxi Huang
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 323
Age: 25
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#541 Postby Cunxi Huang » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:14 pm

JTWC 165kt, 888 mb.

WP, 02, 2021041718, , BEST, 0, 126N, 1284E, 165, 888, ST, 34, NEQ, 190, 145, 170, 195, 1007, 330, 5, 0, 10, W, 0, , 0, 0, SURIGAE, D,
0 likes   
2006 SuTY SAOMAI | 2009 TY LINFA | 2010 TY FANAPI | 2010 SuTY MEGI | 2016 SuTY MERANTI | 2019 SuTY LEKIMA
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1966
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#542 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:15 pm

STILL INTENSIFYING
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
Meow
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 66
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:03 am
Location: New Taipei, Taiwan
Contact:

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#543 Postby Meow » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:19 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:STILL INTENSIFYING

It’s soon to weaken because of ERC.
0 likes   
Wikimedia User:Meow

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4523
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#544 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:20 pm

Put this one in the hall of fame
02W SURIGAE 210417 1800 12.6N 128.4E WPAC 165 888
2 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4523
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#545 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:22 pm

Flashback to that 888mb GFS run...
9 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8911
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#546 Postby Iceresistance » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:22 pm

Meow wrote:
InfernoFlameCat wrote:STILL INTENSIFYING

It’s soon to weaken because of ERC.


I've seen storms do a EWRC & Not Weaken . . .

Latest prime example is Mangkhut from 2018 . . .
0 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8911
Age: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#547 Postby Iceresistance » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:24 pm

Weather Dude wrote:Flashback to that 888mb GFS run...


How did that 888 MB GFS Model run Verify? What are the odds of THAT?? :shocked!:
2 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

User avatar
TorSkk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:08 am

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#548 Postby TorSkk » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:24 pm

TorSkk wrote:High OHC worked its magic

https://i.imgur.com/Kf4jGKL.png


This time it won't recover as it will have left the high OHC area before the ERC is done. Now clearly looking worse on satellite
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#549 Postby aspen » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:52 pm

Weather Dude wrote:Flashback to that 888mb GFS run...

Now we have to actually take those fantasy land runs a little more seriously after this lol.

But in all seriousness, this was probably a fluke coincidence that Surigae managed to peak at exactly the same intensity as one long-range GFS run. It won’t mean anything unless another bonkers fantasy land solution verifies.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4523
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#550 Postby ElectricStorm » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:56 pm

aspen wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:Flashback to that 888mb GFS run...

Now we have to actually take those fantasy land runs a little more seriously after this lol.

But in all seriousness, this was probably a fluke coincidence that Surigae managed to peak at exactly the same intensity as one long-range GFS run. It won’t mean anything unless another bonkers fantasy land solution verifies.

Yeah either way, hopefully the updated GFS will perform much better than the GFS did last year...
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15432
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#551 Postby Kingarabian » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:57 pm

aspen wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:Flashback to that 888mb GFS run...

Now we have to actually take those fantasy land runs a little more seriously after this lol.

But in all seriousness, this was probably a fluke coincidence that Surigae managed to peak at exactly the same intensity as one long-range GFS run. It won’t mean anything unless another bonkers fantasy land solution verifies.

In terms of model intensity verification, the models did really well. Even if Surigae only peaked at 920-925mb, it still wouldn't be a miss by the models. Model intensity forecasts a week out are always some sort of ball park figure.
2 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2899
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#552 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Sat Apr 17, 2021 2:59 pm

lol how are we looking at an 888mb super typhoon in April.
2 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
weeniepatrol
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 857
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 5:30 pm
Location: WA State

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#553 Postby weeniepatrol » Sat Apr 17, 2021 3:04 pm

Grats to the GFS :flag:
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#554 Postby aspen » Sat Apr 17, 2021 3:18 pm

Weather Dude wrote:
aspen wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:Flashback to that 888mb GFS run...

Now we have to actually take those fantasy land runs a little more seriously after this lol.

But in all seriousness, this was probably a fluke coincidence that Surigae managed to peak at exactly the same intensity as one long-range GFS run. It won’t mean anything unless another bonkers fantasy land solution verifies.

Yeah either way, hopefully the updated GFS will perform much better than the GFS did last year...

Even though all the models were sub-par last year, the GFS was pretty good late in the season sniffing out all the WCar storms around two weeks before they even formed. Hopefully this upgrade means it’s moderately reliable throughout the season instead of just at the very end and constantly missing development earlier on.
2 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15951
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#555 Postby Yellow Evan » Sat Apr 17, 2021 3:38 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:STILL INTENSIFYING


It's been on the decline the past few hours in all likelihood due to the ERC. The JTWC is just late as usual.
3 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1767
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#556 Postby kevin » Sat Apr 17, 2021 3:40 pm

aspen wrote:
Weather Dude wrote:
aspen wrote:Now we have to actually take those fantasy land runs a little more seriously after this lol.

But in all seriousness, this was probably a fluke coincidence that Surigae managed to peak at exactly the same intensity as one long-range GFS run. It won’t mean anything unless another bonkers fantasy land solution verifies.

Yeah either way, hopefully the updated GFS will perform much better than the GFS did last year...

Even though all the models were sub-par last year, the GFS was pretty good late in the season sniffing out all the WCar storms around two weeks before they even formed. Hopefully this upgrade means it’s moderately reliable throughout the season instead of just at the very end and constantly missing development earlier on.


Yeah GFS was really weird last year. It indeed sniffed out all of the late season WCar storms super early, only to drop it once the other models also started showing development. And then it joined the party again days later.
0 likes   

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1366
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#557 Postby NotoSans » Sat Apr 17, 2021 3:42 pm

Personal thought: Peak was 160kt at 12Z. That was based on a clear-cut subjective T7.5, SMAP showing 1min max winds of 160kt, and higher ADT values of T8.0.

Microwave estimates have shown a large discrepancy from 135kt (AMSU) to 160kt (SSMIS), but I’d lean towards SSMIS on this one.

I’d lower the intensity to 155KT at 18Z, given the clear ERC trend on microwave.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#558 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Apr 17, 2021 4:10 pm

This would be like a monster cat 5 in the Atlantic in the middle of June?
2 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#559 Postby Highteeld » Sat Apr 17, 2021 4:10 pm

Weather Dude wrote:Put this one in the hall of fame
02W SURIGAE 210417 1800 12.6N 128.4E WPAC 165 888

That's probably pretty close to accurate, but off by several hours.
2 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: WPAC: SURIGAE - Typhoon

#560 Postby Highteeld » Sat Apr 17, 2021 4:11 pm

Was upgraded to cat 5 at 6z last night per latest revision

02W SURIGAE 210417 1800 12.6N 128.4E WPAC 165 888
02W SURIGAE 210417 1200 12.0N 129.2E WPAC 155 900
02W SURIGAE 210417 0600 11.3N 130.2E WPAC 140 919
02W SURIGAE 210417 0000 10.7N 131.1E WPAC 120 940
1 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests