WPAC: JELAWAT - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#161 Postby HurricaneBill » Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:37 am

Typhoon Hunter wrote: It was a real miracle we had recon when Megi was a full peak.



As well as Jangmi in 2008.
0 likes   

User avatar
Crostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2060
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 3:51 pm
Location: Croatia-Europe
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#162 Postby Crostorm » Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:11 am

Nice shot

Image
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#163 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:26 am

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 25 SEP 2012 Time : 113000 UTC
Lat : 16:53:26 N Lon : 127:12:16 E


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.9 / 916.9mb/137.4kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
6.9 6.9 6.9
0 likes   

Typhoon Hunter
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 1215
Age: 40
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 am
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

#164 Postby Typhoon Hunter » Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:09 am

Very nice shot indeed Crostorm, almost as nice as the image of Jangmi in your avatar! :p

Holding firm as a cat. 5 per Dvorak and latest JTWC warning.
0 likes   
James - Documenting typhoons...

http://www.youtube.com/TyphoonHunter

User avatar
euro6208
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 18547
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:50 pm
Location: Guam

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#165 Postby euro6208 » Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:17 am

Image

this isn't a low end category 5 typhoon...it has strengthened from when it was upgraded to a cat 5...140 knots? ......it's probrably about 160 knots right now...

this looks like hurricane mitch (1998) but probrably stronger...





The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the JTWC and JMA products.
0 likes   
Remember, all of my post aren't official. For official warnings and discussions, Please refer to your local NWS products...

NWS for the Western Pacific

https://www.weather.gov/gum/

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3614
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#166 Postby mrbagyo » Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:32 am

this isn't a low end category 5 typhoon...it has strengthened from when it was upgraded to a cat 5...140 knots?

agree with you,
CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.9 / 916.9mb/137.4kt



Tno/CI Rules : Constraint Limits : NO LIMIT
Weakening Flag : OFF
Rapid Dissipation Flag : OFF
weakening is off again
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane_Luis
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 723
Age: 25
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:14 pm
Location: Tiptree, Essex, United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#167 Postby Hurricane_Luis » Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:36 am

mrbagyo wrote:
this isn't a low end category 5 typhoon...it has strengthened from when it was upgraded to a cat 5...140 knots?


I agree to

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
euro6208
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 18547
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:50 pm
Location: Guam

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#168 Postby euro6208 » Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:41 am

mrbagyo wrote:
this isn't a low end category 5 typhoon...it has strengthened from when it was upgraded to a cat 5...140 knots?

agree with you,
CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.9 / 916.9mb/137.4kt



Tno/CI Rules : Constraint Limits : NO LIMIT
Weakening Flag : OFF
Rapid Dissipation Flag : OFF
weakening is off again




T numbers/UW CIMSS in this situation are irrelevant...we have to rely on that weak system that judges a storm's structure, white ring around eye, wmg eye, cold medium gray ring, cmg, met and pt are 7.0, ft is based on dt.....WHAT???

RECON MEASURES REAL PRESSURE AND WINDS....something dvorak will never do....
0 likes   
Remember, all of my post aren't official. For official warnings and discussions, Please refer to your local NWS products...

NWS for the Western Pacific

https://www.weather.gov/gum/

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3614
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#169 Postby mrbagyo » Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:53 am

T numbers/UW CIMSS in this situation are irrelevant...we have to rely on that weak system that judges a storm's structure, white ring around eye, wmg eye, cold medium gray ring, cmg, met and pt are 7.0, ft is based on dt.....WHAT???

RECON MEASURES REAL PRESSURE AND WINDS....something dvorak will never do....


Of course recon is the best, it deals with real measurement not estimates..
recon stopped in 1987, if American air bases didn't leave the Philippines, we might still have recon by now :(
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3614
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#170 Postby mrbagyo » Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:18 pm

whoa... its now moving a bit westward to west-northwestward.. and looks like its about to undergo another round of EWRC
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

Meow

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#171 Postby Meow » Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:30 pm

Typhoon Hunter wrote:It was a real miracle we had recon when Megi was a full peak.

I think Megi was stronger, as we may have had recon before Megi’s peak.

If Jelawat really follows the JMA’s forecast (895 hPa 115 knots), it will become the second typhoon which pressure is below 900 hPa in the 21st century.
0 likes   

Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 21490
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#172 Postby Ntxw » Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:32 pm

Image

Jesus, trucking along.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

ejeraldmc
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:27 pm
Location: Batangas

#173 Postby ejeraldmc » Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:38 pm

hmm... moving a bit west :double:
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
alan1961
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Derby, Derbyshire, England
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#174 Postby alan1961 » Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:26 pm

Operational Linescan System (OLS) image captures
a perfect eye and structure :D

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane_Luis
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 723
Age: 25
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:14 pm
Location: Tiptree, Essex, United Kingdom
Contact:

#175 Postby Hurricane_Luis » Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:29 pm

Bad Luck to People on Okinawa, This is forecast to pass over (or near) the island, at category 3 strenght. But they've been hit by hundreds of
Typhoons and Tropical Storms so they will be fine. :D
0 likes   

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#176 Postby dexterlabio » Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:07 pm

not looking at its best right now, I think... though maybe that's just me again. :lol: the eye seems cloud-filled on visible sat loops but is very clear on IR imagery...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

phwxenthusiast
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 637
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:10 am
Location: Holbrook, NY (Long Island)

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#177 Postby phwxenthusiast » Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:50 pm

dexterlabio wrote:not looking at its best right now, I think... though maybe that's just me again. :lol: the eye seems cloud-filled on visible sat loops but is very clear on IR imagery...


EWRC still going on so maybe that's causing the weakening... this is nearly 4-hours old though so not sure the progress is but if it could successfully complete that cycle, we may see it recover in the next 24 hours just like what we saw two days ago...

Image

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3614
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#178 Postby mrbagyo » Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:04 am

the eye keep getting bigger and bigger with every Eyewall replacement cycle, when the eye clears out, this will be HUGE, bigger than before. looks like Jelawat of 2012 want to imitate the Jelawat of 2000
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/mimic-tc/2012_18W/webManager/displayGifsBy12hr_10.html
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3614
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#179 Postby mrbagyo » Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:32 am

Image

look at that huge round eye, and .... looks like its going annular?? just like Jelawat of 2000?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: WPAC: JELAWAT - Typhoon

#180 Postby dexterlabio » Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:41 am

it seems like the EWRC is not yet complete with its appearance right now. and it feels like this round of EWR will be "fatal" to the typhoon itself, but we'll see.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests