ATL: ARTHUR - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#21 Postby Alyono » Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:42 am

GFS is not indicating favorable conditions. The surface low is EAST of the UH, which means fairly strong northerly wind shear will be present over the system

a weak, sheared TS at most of the most likely outcome, though development chances do look better than not
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#22 Postby NDG » Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:53 am

For those of you wondering how warm the gulf stream is, it is in the mid 80s the with some areas in the upper 80s closer to the south, reason why convection blossomed last night as soon as the disturbance went over it last night.

Image
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139349
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#23 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:54 am

Here is Dr Jeff Masters discussion about 91L.

A area of disturbed weather over the warm waters of the Gulf Stream current off the Southeast U.S. coast has been designated Invest 91L by NHC. Satellite loops on Saturday morning showed 91L with only a small amount of heavy thunderstorm activity that was poorly organized. There was no hint of a surface circulation trying to form. Long-range radar out of Melbourne, Florida showed a few modest areas of rainfall over the ocean about 50 - 150 miles east of the Central Florida coast. Sea surface temperatures in this region were about 1°C above average, 27 - 28°C--plenty of heat energy for a developing tropical cyclone. Wind shear was moderate, 10 - 15 knots. The shear was due to strong upper-level winds out of the north, which were keeping any heavy thunderstorms from developing on the north side of 91L. Water vapor satellite loops showed that the atmosphere was moderately moist off the Southeast U.S. coast, and dry air should not be a significant impediment to development. The Hurricane Hunters are on call to investigate 91L on Sunday afternoon.

Forecast for 91L

The 12Z Saturday run of the SHIPS model showed light to moderate shear, 5 - 15 knots, over 91L for the next five days. With the disturbance parked over the warm waters of the Gulf Stream, organization into a tropical depression is a good possibility. In their 8 am EDT Saturday Tropical Weather Outlook, NHC gave 91L 2-day and 5-day development odds of 30% and 50%, respectively. As of noon EDT, I'd put these odds higher, at 40% and 60%, respectively. Steering currents are weak off of the Southeast U.S. coast, and the uncertainty in the track of 91L is higher than usual. The 00Z Saturday run of the UKMET and European models predicted a slow motion to the northeast, with the European model showing a potential threat to the North Carolina coast by Thursday. The 00Z and 06Z Saturday runs of the GFS model predict the opposite motion, a slow track southwestwards with a landfall in Florida on Tuesday. None of these models showed 91L reaching tropical storm strength. The UKMET and European model have been pretty consistent with their recent runs, so I favor their solution of a more northeasterly motion for 91L over the next five days.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

SeGaBob

#24 Postby SeGaBob » Sat Jun 28, 2014 11:13 am

Some sort of circulation appears more obvious on satellite north of the main blob. It might be a naked swirl.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4929
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#25 Postby Nimbus » Sat Jun 28, 2014 11:17 am

Wonder if the convection being displaced south by the shear will effect the track.
Sometimes the centers of developing storms chase the shear in the mid levels.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139349
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#26 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:41 pm

TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
200 PM EDT SAT JUN 28 2014

For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico:

A broad low pressure area located about 120 miles southeast of the
coast of South Carolina continues to produce disorganized
showers and thunderstorms. Environmental conditions are expected
to remain conducive for gradual development of this system while
it drifts southward offshore of Georgia and northeastern Florida
during the next few days.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...medium...40 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...60 percent.

$$
Forecaster Brown
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#27 Postby Alyono » Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:57 pm

Not sure where they are getting favorable conditions from. Conditions appear as if they will be marginal at best

Not unfavorable enough to prevent development, but most certainly not favorable. We have what looks like 25 KT of shear over the center. The SHIPS area average is including the region SW of the center with little shear
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3874
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: West Melbourne, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#28 Postby AJC3 » Sat Jun 28, 2014 1:00 pm

cycloneye wrote:Here is Dr Jeff Masters discussion about 91L.

A area of disturbed weather over the warm waters of the Gulf Stream current off the Southeast U.S. coast has been designated Invest 91L by NHC. Satellite loops on Saturday morning showed 91L with only a small amount of heavy thunderstorm activity that was poorly organized. There was no hint of a surface circulation trying to form. Long-range radar out of Melbourne, Florida showed a few modest areas of rainfall over the ocean about 50 - 150 miles east of the Central Florida coast. Sea surface temperatures in this region were about 1°C above average, 27 - 28°C--plenty of heat energy for a developing tropical cyclone. Wind shear was moderate, 10 - 15 knots. The shear was due to strong upper-level winds out of the north, which were keeping any heavy thunderstorms from developing on the north side of 91L. Water vapor satellite loops showed that the atmosphere was moderately moist off the Southeast U.S. coast, and dry air should not be a significant impediment to development. The Hurricane Hunters are on call to investigate 91L on Sunday afternoon.

Forecast for 91L

The 12Z Saturday run of the SHIPS model showed light to moderate shear, 5 - 15 knots, over 91L for the next five days. With the disturbance parked over the warm waters of the Gulf Stream, organization into a tropical depression is a good possibility. In their 8 am EDT Saturday Tropical Weather Outlook, NHC gave 91L 2-day and 5-day development odds of 30% and 50%, respectively. As of noon EDT, I'd put these odds higher, at 40% and 60%, respectively. Steering currents are weak off of the Southeast U.S. coast, and the uncertainty in the track of 91L is higher than usual. The 00Z Saturday run of the UKMET and European models predicted a slow motion to the northeast, with the European model showing a potential threat to the North Carolina coast by Thursday. The 00Z and 06Z Saturday runs of the GFS model predict the opposite motion, a slow track southwestwards with a landfall in Florida on Tuesday. None of these models showed 91L reaching tropical storm strength. The UKMET and European model have been pretty consistent with their recent runs, so I favor their solution of a more northeasterly motion for 91L over the next five days.


I'm really confused about his take on this.

Number 1, there is more than a hint of a circulation at the surface. Rather ill-defined and broad? Yes...however, not a hint? Very far from it.

Number 2, ALL of the reliable model guidance that I've looked at, the 00Z UKM and ECM included, showed an initial southward motion for a couple days. he seems to imply that they simply showed the low moving northeast from its current location, which is simply not the case.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#29 Postby gatorcane » Sat Jun 28, 2014 1:36 pm

Latest floater saved image, with pressure lines superimposed. The little 1019 circle is where the lowest pressures are at. The system is gradually becoming more organized:

Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Sat Jun 28, 2014 1:38 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 26
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re:

#30 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:09 pm

Alyono wrote:Not sure where they are getting favorable conditions from. Conditions appear as if they will be marginal at best

Not unfavorable enough to prevent development, but most certainly not favorable. We have what looks like 25 KT of shear over the center. The SHIPS area average is including the region SW of the center with little shear

If shear was 25kt, we wouldn't be seeing this system organize now or ever. That's too strong for development. The UW-CIMSS map has 10kt over the center. The SHIPS analyzed with exactly 10kt as well, and shows it remaining low through the next 5 days.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#31 Postby Alyono » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:09 pm

I'm seeing a peak intensity (on a scaled wind speed version of the EC, of 55 to 60 KT)
0 likes   

User avatar
lester
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1305
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#32 Postby lester » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:14 pm

AdamFirst wrote:
What time frame is that?


Wednesday, makes landfall in the Carolinas Saturday if Euro is correct, very big if though
0 likes   

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re: Re:

#33 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:19 pm

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:
Alyono wrote:Not sure where they are getting favorable conditions from. Conditions appear as if they will be marginal at best

Not unfavorable enough to prevent development, but most certainly not favorable. We have what looks like 25 KT of shear over the center. The SHIPS area average is including the region SW of the center with little shear

If shear was 25kt, we wouldn't be seeing this system organize now or ever. That's too strong for development. The UW-CIMSS map has 10kt over the center. The SHIPS analyzed with exactly 10kt as well, and shows it remaining low through the next 5 days.

Wind shear could still be a problem IMO.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Re:

#34 Postby Alyono » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:21 pm

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:
Alyono wrote:Not sure where they are getting favorable conditions from. Conditions appear as if they will be marginal at best

Not unfavorable enough to prevent development, but most certainly not favorable. We have what looks like 25 KT of shear over the center. The SHIPS area average is including the region SW of the center with little shear

If shear was 25kt, we wouldn't be seeing this system organize now or ever. That's too strong for development. The UW-CIMSS map has 10kt over the center. The SHIPS analyzed with exactly 10kt as well, and shows it remaining low through the next 5 days.


Please read what I post before commenting. I explained that SHIPS is an average. Furthermore, systems from a nontropical origin do form in higher shear enviroinments. If shear was only 10 KT, you wouldn't have the convection that far south of the center

As I said, shear is quite light to the SW. If this moves like the EC indicates, this will blow up. However, it has YET to encounter these conditions
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#35 Postby NDG » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:37 pm

:uarrow: Not sure if 91L is that much of Non-tropical origin, its vorticity clearly came from the deep convection that formed over the NW GOM on Wednesday from a very deep tropical surge & UL divergence, then rotated around high pressure in the eastern GOM, across the deep south.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#36 Postby NDG » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:48 pm

Convection continuous to increase across the northern quadrant of 91L

Saved loop:

Image
0 likes   

crimi481
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#37 Postby crimi481 » Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:14 pm

will the High over the mid USA steer it around the circle of fire? Send it S.W?
0 likes   

crimi481
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#38 Postby crimi481 » Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:16 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3205
Age: 60
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#39 Postby tropicwatch » Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:31 pm

crimi481 wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/eaus/flash-wv.html


From looking at that, I don't think 91L will be in a hurry to go anywhere.
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

crimi481
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#40 Postby crimi481 » Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:36 pm

I agree. Think lots of moisture nudges from the system over Florida. It could re organize in S.E Gulf - or near Miami. Hard to call
0 likes   


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests