CrazyC83 wrote:Was it a Cat 5? Maybe at 1200Z. But 130 kt is likely generous now.
I think it probably was now that I think about it. I'd go with 125 knts now myself.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
CrazyC83 wrote:Was it a Cat 5? Maybe at 1200Z. But 130 kt is likely generous now.
CrazyC83 wrote:Was it a Cat 5? Maybe at 1200Z. But 130 kt is likely generous now.
TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:supercane4867 wrote:12Z HWRF initializes Amanda as a Cat.5, 175kt on 850mb level translates to about 140kt at surface
That is just model-analyzed, but 175kt at 850 millibars would support a 140kt Category 5.
While I believe this peaked at 160 mph, there's not quite enough evidence for an upgrade. SAB came in at T6.5/127kt despite TAFB's T7.0/140kt, and UW-CIMSS ADT peaked at T6.9/137kt. This storm is more borderline than Igor.
RL3AO wrote:Very very close as to if it reached cat 5. I'm sure they'll take a close look at it in post season. IMO, it was a clear enough T7.0 to go 140kt.
Kingarabian wrote:I think once a storm reaches a 155 mph, it should be declared a category 5. The rule is a 156mph+... which is fine if you have an abundant resource of recon. But if you're using satellite estimates, a 1mph +/- in wind speed that makes all the difference is pretty tough.
Yellow Evan wrote:Kingarabian wrote:I think once a storm reaches a 155 mph, it should be declared a category 5. The rule is a 156mph+... which is fine if you have an abundant resource of recon. But if you're using satellite estimates, a 1mph +/- in wind speed that makes all the difference is pretty tough.
You have to draw the line somewhere.
Kingarabian wrote:I think once a storm reaches a 155 mph, it should be declared a category 5. The rule is a 156mph+... which is fine if you have an abundant resource of recon. But if you're using satellite estimates, a 1mph +/- in wind speed that makes all the difference is pretty tough.
Kingarabian wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:Kingarabian wrote:I think once a storm reaches a 155 mph, it should be declared a category 5. The rule is a 156mph+... which is fine if you have an abundant resource of recon. But if you're using satellite estimates, a 1mph +/- in wind speed that makes all the difference is pretty tough.
You have to draw the line somewhere.
Either make it 160mph or 155mph. 156mph is too much of a tight margin.
RL3AO wrote:Kingarabian wrote:
Remember the scale is in knots. We just convert to mph for convince.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests