ATL: FERNAND - Renmants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#121 Postby Sanibel » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:26 am

It looks like all the ducks are in a row.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#122 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:30 am

Looks like this will be named by Recon later IMO....probably already a TD...
0 likes   

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#123 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:34 am

Needs a Special Advisory NOW. People in Mexico need warning. TWC Mets are laughing it off.
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#124 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:34 am

Another visible image:

Image

Excellent structure.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5795
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#125 Postby MGC » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:37 am

95L looks real good. Thankfully is will be ashore soon. Could become a moderate TS before landfall.....MGC
0 likes   

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#126 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:39 am

MGC wrote:95L looks real good. Thankfully is will be ashore soon. Could become a moderate TS before landfall.....MGC

Probably will be one by the time recon gets there :wink:
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
weatherwindow
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
Location: key west/ft lauderdale

Re:

#127 Postby weatherwindow » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:41 am

panamatropicwatch wrote:Winds continue to increase near Veracruz
Station SACV4 - SACRIFICE ISLAND, MEXICO
August 25, 2013 11:00 am CDT
Location: 19.174N 96.093W or 0 nautical miles N of search location of 19.174N 96.093W.
Wind Direction: NNW (340°)
Wind Speed: 33 knots
Wind Gust: 37 knots
Atmospheric Pressure: 29.88 in (1011.8 mb)


Here is the link for the above station:
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/radial_search. ... E&dist=250
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=SACV4

Good afternoon, panama et al....checking for nearby ship traffic/reports ..none, zip...was rather surprised given the volume of coastal traffic on the Mexican coast :?: ....Grtz from KW, Rich
Last edited by weatherwindow on Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#128 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 am

I think the timing for recon is a little off... they should have been out there by now.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#129 Postby NDG » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:48 am

I guess the NHC had scheduled it for 20z thinking that it was not going to be organizing so quickly otherwise they would had scheduled it for 18z if not earlier.
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#130 Postby HurriGuy » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:48 am

I'm just anxious to see if we get a hurricane in August now. is it really even possible with this thing so close to land? Where do y'all think the center is?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#131 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:48 am

Aric Dunn wrote:I think the timing for recon is a little off... they should have been out there by now.


C. 25/1715Z

Take off in 30 minutes.
0 likes   

hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2904
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#132 Postby hurricanes1234 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:56 am

The only factor inhibiting intensification is its close proximity to land, am I correct? However, someone said earlier that it is moving more NW than previously, which would mean more time over 31°C waters. What is the most logical scenario in terms of strength?

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22486
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#133 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:59 am

Certainly looks quite impressive on satellite. I suspect it's a TS with 40-45 kt winds. NHC should be able to upgrade without recon and without obs, or else they won't be able to upgrade a system east of 55W. Look for the 18Z model guidance to be titled "Six" or "Fernand".
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 35
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#134 Postby Macrocane » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:01 pm

Actually proximity to land is not a big issue for the Campeche Bay as several storms have intensified in near record time in there. 2007 Lorenzo (I believe it's actually the record from TD to cat 1), 2010 Karl and 2011 Nate come to my mind.
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherwindow
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
Location: key west/ft lauderdale

Re: Re:

#135 Postby weatherwindow » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:01 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:I think the timing for recon is a little off... they should have been out there by now.


C. 25/1715Z

Take off in 30 minutes.


E. 25/1900Z to 26/0000Z

First obs in vicinity of 95L approx 300EDT

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/MIAREPRPD_last.shtml
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#136 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:11 pm

Usually the way the land curves actually helps systems in 95L's position, seen many a quick blow up from small circulations in this part of the BoC.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#137 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:11 pm

Feels like somethings just about to pop. Now wouldnt be the slightest suprised if this is 90kt at landfall. :double:
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#138 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:13 pm

Just my guess, NOT official!:

Given past systems and how quick they have organized in the BOC, I would not be surprised if recon found 50 knot winds in the convection down there. There is definitely a nice spin, question is does it extend to the surface in an organized LLC (versus just a broad spin)? I haven't looked at obs, and haven't really been paying attention today. By the time either recon leaves or it makes landfall, judging by the rapid organization, I wouldn't be surprised if it were pushing 55 to 60 knots.
0 likes   
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re:

#139 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:15 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Just my guess, NOT official!:

Given past systems and how quick they have organized in the BOC, I would not be surprised if recon found 50 knot winds in the convection down there. There is definitely a nice spin, question is does it extend to the surface in an organized LLC (versus just a broad spin)? I haven't looked at obs, and haven't really been paying attention today. By the time either recon leaves or it makes landfall, judging by the rapid organization, I wouldn't be surprised if it were pushing 55 to 60 knots.

Oh definitely. I might even go slightly more bullish on this system. :wink:
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#140 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:16 pm

HurricaneDREW92 wrote:Feels like somethings just about to pop. Now wouldnt be the slightest suprised if this is 90kt at landfall. :double:


Lets not get crazy now.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests