ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#901 Postby ROCK » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:24 pm

MGC wrote:Text book example of how a ULL can wreck a developing TC. Still a small window of opportunity.....I thought the cutoff ULL would have moved by now, stopping the dry air from Texas. Yes, Texas is partly to thank for 92L not getting going....MGC



Oh yeah blame it on Texas....:D whatver...
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#902 Postby HurriGuy » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:26 pm

Has this moved in 2 days?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1475
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#903 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:29 pm

IF this area can break off from the trough over the next few days, it COULD develop. Any development would be slow until then though.

GCANE wrote:At least one of the hot towers confirmed on the low-res rain rate Metop-A imager, 26N 89.5W, 1522Z.

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc13/A ... W.67pc.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#904 Postby perk » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:31 pm

ROCK wrote:
MGC wrote:Text book example of how a ULL can wreck a developing TC. Still a small window of opportunity.....I thought the cutoff ULL would have moved by now, stopping the dry air from Texas. Yes, Texas is partly to thank for 92L not getting going....MGC



Oh yeah blame it on Texas....:D whatver...




At least we know how MGC feels about the great state of Texas. :P
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re:

#905 Postby perk » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:32 pm

HurriGuy wrote:Has this moved in 2 days?



Not much if at all.
0 likes   

ninel conde
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:18 pm

#906 Postby ninel conde » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:36 pm

the BOC is the only place in the basin marginally favorable for development. most likely a weak TS will be hitting mexico in a few days.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6617
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#907 Postby Stormcenter » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:38 pm

Whatever is in the GOM still has potential and it's not going anywhere fast. IMO
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#908 Postby ozonepete » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:47 pm

GCANE wrote:Looking at 200mb vorticity, ULL is just about dead.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/a ... g8vor1.GIF

Should see some interesting changes in the next 12hrs.


GCANE you are correct as usual. The 200 and 250mb vorticity and wind charts show no circulation at all. What you see on the water vapor loop is not the ULL from yesterday. That's a mid level feature left over from yesterday's 500mb vorticity - it's a thin wafer of spinning moist air that's spinning down rapidly. But it doesn't matter. IMHO this is a dead duck. I just can't see it redeveloping. The vorticity remains very stretched, most likely due to the very strong winds from the surface all the way up past 500mb on the east side of this system while winds on the west side of it are northerly but pretty light. So it's behaving more like a front. You can't get any spin at the mid-levels. I just can't see anything coming of this.
0 likes   

ninel conde
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:18 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#909 Postby ninel conde » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:55 pm

ozonepete wrote:
GCANE wrote:Looking at 200mb vorticity, ULL is just about dead.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/a ... g8vor1.GIF

Should see some interesting changes in the next 12hrs.


GCANE you are correct as usual. The 200 and 250mb vorticity and wind charts show no circulation at all. What you see on the water vapor loop is not the ULL from yesterday. That's a mid level feature left over from yesterday's 500mb vorticity - it's a thin wafer of spinning moist air that's spinning down rapidly. But it doesn't matter. IMHO this is a dead duck. I just can't see it redeveloping. The vorticity remains very stretched, most likely due to the very strong winds from the surface all the way up past 500mb on the east side of this system while winds on the west side of it are northerly but pretty light. So it's behaving more like a front. You can't get any spin at the mid-levels. I just can't see anything coming of this.


i still think the southern end has a chance. its hard for anything to develop in the GOM of importance when a trof is dominating the east coast. that pretty much guarantees a stretched messy gyre.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1475
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#910 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:55 pm

Totally agree. I expect chances of formation from NHC to continue to drop slowly. Definitely behaving more like a front.

ozonepete wrote:GCANE you are correct as usual. The 200 and 250mb vorticity and wind charts show no circulation at all. What you see on the water vapor loop is not the ULL from yesterday. That's a mid level feature left over from yesterday's 500mb vorticity - it's a thin wafer of spinning moist air that's spinning down rapidly. But it doesn't matter. IMHO this is a dead duck. I just can't see it redeveloping. The vorticity remains very stretched, most likely due to the very strong winds from the surface all the way up past 500mb on the east side of this system while winds on the west side of it are northerly but pretty light. So it's behaving more like a front. You can't get any spin at the mid-levels. I just can't see anything coming of this.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139083
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#911 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:02 pm

18z Best Track.

AL, 92, 2013081718, , BEST, 0, 208N, 932W, 25, 1010, LO
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#912 Postby Steve » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:24 pm

This post is not official etc.

Here's the deal. We knew last Sunday this was most likely a western Gulf "low" based on the teleconnection with typhoon utor. While not 100%, tracks in the WPAC in August, September and early October do usually give us important clues. When utor decided to move into china that far south, you knew there would be ridging in the SE US at least a few days later. You can see that now by watching a w Atlantic satellite loop and see the push off the SE us coast from the east and southeast.. Interestingly enough, TD's 12w and 13w are showing more ridging from the sw Atlantic for the next week or so. This could matter with the circulation out front of Erin that came off Africa amidst all that dry air. It's east of the islands and probably the next thing to watch when it gets past 70W. I'm not calling for anything to necessarily develop out of it, but there should be at least an opportunity for something to crank off Florida or the Bahamas. We also knew that there was likely going to be at least a tropical surge into the Florida panhandle because we knew a trough would set up in the northern gulf. Incidentally, It appears the trough has come about as far east as it is going to. Either it should lift out in a day or two, back west, or most likely split a piece off west of 92l. Some models had it setting up farther east. It not having done so is BAD news for the southeastern US and potentially signals that the SE US will be open for the 3 or so shots I'm expecting between MS and NC this season.

It's tough to say what else 92L might do at this point. NAM simulated radar still wants to wrap up low pressure (if not necessarily completely at the surface) as it moves into s/sc Texas. Canadian spins up a low right off the la coast. Nothing else really does a whole lot with it, but tropical rainfall should be expected to funnel into the gulf coast. If the trough backs west a little, the tropical surge (with training effects) will move increasingly further west as well. A disorganized system where 92l is will have the tendency to pump tons of moisture into the northern gulf. We saw that today in nw fl. Not saying everything that blows up will make it all the way to the coast, but there is a setup in place for localized flooding. If you are anywhere between cape San blas and Galveston, you should keep up with our local weather over the next few days for potential flooding. Word.


This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5792
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#913 Postby MGC » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:41 pm

I was thanking Texas for send all that hot dry air y'all are famous for down there to help hold 92L down. Ha, only gripe I have about Texas is that it takes alllllll day to drive across. Does look like a bit of convection is firing near the circulation....so maybe Fred ain't dead just yet....MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10787
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#914 Postby GCANE » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:41 pm

ozonepete wrote:
GCANE wrote:Looking at 200mb vorticity, ULL is just about dead.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/a ... g8vor1.GIF

Should see some interesting changes in the next 12hrs.


GCANE you are correct as usual. The 200 and 250mb vorticity and wind charts show no circulation at all. What you see on the water vapor loop is not the ULL from yesterday. That's a mid level feature left over from yesterday's 500mb vorticity - it's a thin wafer of spinning moist air that's spinning down rapidly. But it doesn't matter. IMHO this is a dead duck. I just can't see it redeveloping. The vorticity remains very stretched, most likely due to the very strong winds from the surface all the way up past 500mb on the east side of this system while winds on the west side of it are northerly but pretty light. So it's behaving more like a front. You can't get any spin at the mid-levels. I just can't see anything coming of this.



Much thanks OP. As always, your insights are much appreciated.

Agreed about the stretched 850 to 750 mb vorticity.

Given the hot towers firing for an extended period of time, I am going to wait till after DMAX tomorrow morning to see for sure.

Latest SCAT is not too bad with what looks like a surface COC at 19.5N 93.5W

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/product ... 0_SCAT.GIF

I just checked CAPE in the GOM and its max'ing at 8500 albeit pretty far removed from the system though.

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanaly ... 6768431649
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#915 Postby HurriGuy » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:49 pm

I hope something positive happens with the trough soon. FL/AL look miserable. Keep thinking radar is broken. Same picture all day.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 65
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#916 Postby Pearl River » Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:04 pm

It could be an optical illusion, but there appears to be a weak circulation around SE LA according to radar. You notice the stream from SW to NE along the trough, but the smaller storms appear to have a weak circulation from E to SW. http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=LIX&product=N0Z&overlay=11101111&loop=yes. Could this be whatt the CMC is attempting to sniff out?
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 28974
Age: 72
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Spring Branch area, Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#917 Postby vbhoutex » Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:15 pm

Pearl River wrote:It could be an optical illusion, but there appears to be a weak circulation around SE LA according to radar. You notice the stream from SW to NE along the trough, but the smaller storms appear to have a weak circulation from E to SW. http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=LIX&product=N0Z&overlay=11101111&loop=yes. Could this be whatt the CMC is attempting to sniff out?

I see what you are looking at/talking about, but I wouldn't classify it as a circulation or even the start of one.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8606
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#918 Postby Steve » Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:15 pm

Could be pearl. RAP valid 19z shows vorticity moving up into southern MS and SW AL over the next 18 hours. Not sure it's really at the surface, but it's going to pump in moisture.
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#919 Postby HurriGuy » Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:49 pm

So are there any circulations left? Upper or middle? I can't tell on any of the satellite loops.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
stormy70
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Age: 54
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:51 am
Location: Fairhope, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#920 Postby stormy70 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:12 pm

I have pictures along the Eastern Shore in Alabama showing the clouds and rain along Mobile Bay. We were looking for a Jubilee but never found it. It was in Montrose. But the clouds along the bay shows the weather this system is kicking up toward us. Rain all day.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/534/tp9x.jpg/
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests