ATL: FERNAND - Renmants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#21 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:16 pm

18N 91W is almost over water already. That's about where I was looking also.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re:

#22 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:21 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:18N 91W is almost over water already. That's about where I was looking also.


I'm at about 17.5N and 90.5W
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#23 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:27 pm

Given the position... it is probably LESS likely that this moves into the BOC.

However, if it does move into the BOC... it likely will develop. Nothing at all wrong with NHCs probs given this
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 40
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

#24 Postby thetruesms » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:27 pm

Invest over land? I don't know where Bones is, but I did bump into this guy
Image

But seriously, for how it looks now, I'd be interested to see what it could do over water . . . if it can manage it
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139115
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#25 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:29 pm

18z Best Track.

AL, 95, 2013082418, , BEST, 0, 174N, 908W, 20, 1009, LO
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#26 Postby SouthDadeFish » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:49 pm

17.4N put its chances at development a lot lower than 18N...
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#27 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:54 pm

greater than 50/50 chance it never sees the water. Probably 65/35 that it remains onshore.
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3205
Age: 60
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#28 Postby tropicwatch » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:55 pm

A weather station at Nueva Villahermosa 17.99n 92.93w is reporting a pressure of 1004mb. With a weather station to its northeast with east winds, station to its west nw winds and stations to its south with west winds.

Image
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
weatherwindow
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
Location: key west/ft lauderdale

Re:

#29 Postby weatherwindow » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:18 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:17.4N put its chances at development a lot lower than 18N...


Good afternoon, SDF...Tend to agree with your assessment. If 17.4 is an accurate fix, IMO, the key to development is the exact vector of its motion...WNW covers a fair amount of territory...roughly 285deg to 300deg...In order to reach the target location mentioned in the recon schedule, 20.0N 95,5W, a motion of approximately 300deg would likely be needed. Even given that motion and the above location, it is spending precious little time over water and remains in close proximity to land thruout. Cyclogenesis is certainly possible but it will require a fairly rapid organization during its limited time over water....Im pulling for the underdog :wink: ...Grtz from KW, Rich
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#30 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:48 pm

panamatropicwatch wrote:A weather station at Nueva Villahermosa 17.99n 92.93w is reporting a pressure of 1004mb. With a weather station to its northeast with east winds, station to its west nw winds and stations to its south with west winds.

http://tropicwatch.info/nueva.jpg


With that setup, the center is likely around 18.0N 93.0W?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#31 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:52 pm

Have any models been run yet?
0 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3535
Age: 29
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#32 Postby Extratropical94 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:57 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Have any models been run yet?

1800Z tropical models

Code: Select all

WHXX01 KWBC 241823
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1823 UTC SAT AUG 24 2013
 
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.
 
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
 
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL952013) 20130824 1800 UTC
 
        ...00 HRS...   ...12 HRS...   ...24 HRS...   ...36 HRS...
        130824  1800   130825  0600   130825  1800   130826  0600
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    17.4N  90.8W   18.3N  93.2W   19.2N  95.4W   19.8N  97.5W
BAMD    17.4N  90.8W   18.1N  92.8W   18.8N  94.8W   19.4N  96.8W
BAMM    17.4N  90.8W   18.2N  93.0W   18.8N  95.1W   19.5N  97.3W
LBAR    17.4N  90.8W   18.1N  92.8W   19.1N  95.3W   20.2N  98.1W
SHIP        20KTS          22KTS          27KTS          35KTS
DSHP        20KTS          24KTS          31KTS          29KTS
 
        ...48 HRS...   ...72 HRS...   ...96 HRS...   ..120 HRS...
        130826  1800   130827  1800   130828  1800   130829  1800
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    20.5N  99.5W   21.6N 103.8W   23.3N 108.5W   24.9N 114.0W
BAMD    20.1N  99.0W   21.4N 103.4W   22.8N 107.8W   23.9N 112.6W
BAMM    20.1N  99.4W   21.4N 103.9W   22.8N 108.7W   24.1N 114.1W
LBAR    21.6N 101.1W   25.4N 106.3W   30.1N 109.8W   35.0N 112.3W
SHIP        46KTS          57KTS          65KTS          64KTS
DSHP        27KTS          27KTS          34KTS          33KTS
 
         ...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR =  17.4N LONCUR =  90.8W DIRCUR = 280DEG SPDCUR =   8KT
LATM12 =  17.2N LONM12 =  89.0W DIRM12 = 277DEG SPDM12 =   8KT
LATM24 =  17.0N LONM24 =  87.7W
WNDCUR =   20KT RMAXWD =   90NM WNDM12 =   20KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1011MB OUTRAD =  120NM SDEPTH =   S
RD34NE =    0NM RD34SE =    0NM RD34SW =    0NM RD34NW =   0NM
 
$$
NNNN
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#33 Postby jinftl » Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:11 pm

Going to be close, but the center may make it out over water long enough to become a td or weak ts.

Image

Image

CrazyC83 wrote:Have any models been run yet?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#34 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:20 pm

While I think it is -highly- unlikely, wouldn't it be utterly ironic if this were to become the first hurricane?
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
beoumont
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: East Central Florida
Contact:

Re: Re:

#35 Postby beoumont » Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:27 pm

jinftl wrote:Going to be close, but the center may make it out over water long enough to become a td or weak ts.

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3456/9ln8.png

http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/6093/3q7a.png

CrazyC83 wrote:Have any models been run yet?


I guess that 64 knts. goes with the LBar. That would be near the San Francisco Peaks just north of Flagstaff, AZ at 12,000 ft --- hence orographic lifting; a mini-Mt. Washington, 1938 hurricane effect.
Last edited by beoumont on Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:49 pm, edited 4 times in total.
0 likes   
List of 79 tropical cyclones intercepted by Richard Horodner:
http://www.canebeard.com/page/page/572246.htm

User avatar
TexasF6
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 788
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#36 Postby TexasF6 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:28 pm

Another USELESS storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#37 Postby ROCK » Sat Aug 24, 2013 4:01 pm

TexasF6 wrote:Another USELESS storm.


not a storm yet if at all...and it wont be useless if it does take another name off the list for some of us who had high numbers at the beginning of the year.

Gudos to the NAVGEM and NAM for seeing this whereas the GFS didnt see squat...someone joked the other day about the NAVGEM keeping this intact over land and low in behold it has done just that....nice job NAVGEM and NAM!!!
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#38 Postby jinftl » Sat Aug 24, 2013 4:18 pm

Just a "uesless" invest as of now - something the NHC is interested in collecting data and/or running model guidance for it. Kinda their job to do that. Us following up on it and posting about it here is purely optional though.


TexasF6 wrote:Another USELESS storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#39 Postby wxman57 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 4:34 pm

Obs across Mexico indicate any circulation is elevated above the surface, as was the case with the disturbance in the northern Gulf yesterday. If it's way down at 17.5N then it may have a hard time moving over the BoC.
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherwindow
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
Location: key west/ft lauderdale

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#40 Postby weatherwindow » Sat Aug 24, 2013 5:24 pm

Good evening, all....our latest grasp for "some development, any development" :oops:, 95L, appears to gaining a bit of latitude. It will need all it can get. Following the visible loop over the past 3 hrs, the incipient center, under an MCS, appears to have migrated to ~18.2N 91.5W, an apparent motion of about 315deg or NW. I doubt that this is necessarily typical of the overall motion expected over the next 48hrs. However, if my observation is correct, further motion on this vector may give 95L a bit more of a glimpse of the GOM....Grtz from KW, Rich
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests