ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7282
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#21 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Jul 02, 2017 9:55 pm

weathaguyry wrote:
CYCLONE MIKE wrote:I don't trust the gfs 48 hrs out. Remember with cindy it had her making landfall in apalachee bay or the eastern part of Florida panhandle when every other model was showing LA/TX. Im willing to bet that trough will not be near as strong in a week as the gfs is depicting.


That could possibly cause some trouble for people from NC northward
or even people in Florida or eastern GOM
2 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15955
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#22 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun Jul 02, 2017 9:56 pm

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:I don't trust the gfs 48 hrs out. Remember with cindy it had her making landfall in apalachee bay or the eastern part of Florida panhandle when every other model was showing LA/TX. Im willing to bet that trough will not be near as strong in a week as the gfs is depicting.


I doubt the trough wont not be strong but all models tend to re-curve too quickly in this situation. With that said, this is not a mainland USA threat at this time in the forseeable future.
Last edited by Yellow Evan on Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 20
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#23 Postby weathaguyry » Sun Jul 02, 2017 9:58 pm

BlowHard wrote:Before it gets to you guys I looks likely to go over Puerto Rico.....No SAL to speak of, no shear, warm water. Someone tell me I'm wrong....


Typically Puerto Rico landfalls can signal a North Carolina landfall :eek:
0 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7282
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#24 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:01 pm

BlowHard wrote:Before it gets to you guys I looks likely to go over Puerto Rico.....No SAL to speak of, no shear, warm water. Someone tell me I'm wrong....

No model has this even touching the lesser Antilles never mind Puerto Rico but the models can change path depending on the ridge strength or even orientation or even where the trough is or god forbid isn't so we have 10+ days to watch this
2 likes   

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#25 Postby TheStormExpert » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:02 pm

Its way too soon to be saying who will ever be at threat, if anyone.
4 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
BlowHard
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 44
Age: 65
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 9:15 pm
Location: Vieques, PR/Swansea, MA
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#26 Postby BlowHard » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:04 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
BlowHard wrote:Before it gets to you guys I looks likely to go over Puerto Rico.....No SAL to speak of, no shear, warm water. Someone tell me I'm wrong....

No model has this even touching the lesser Antilles never mind Puerto Rico but the models can change path depending on the ridge strength or even orientation or even where the trough is or god forbid isn't so we have 10+ days to watch this


Twelve hours ago, none of the models showed it NOT going over Puerto Rico....
1 likes   
I am not a professional and this is just my opinion. Always refer to the professionals for advice.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15955
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#27 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:10 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
BlowHard wrote:Before it gets to you guys I looks likely to go over Puerto Rico.....No SAL to speak of, no shear, warm water. Someone tell me I'm wrong....

No model has this even touching the lesser Antilles never mind Puerto Rico but the models can change path depending on the ridge strength or even orientation or even where the trough is or god forbid isn't so we have 10+ days to watch this


ECMWF-P does.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15955
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#28 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:16 pm

* ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST *
* IR SAT DATA AVAILABLE, OHC AVAILABLE *
* INVEST AL942017 07/03/17 00 UTC *

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
V (KT) NO LAND 20 21 24 27 31 41 52 63 71 74 77 80 81
V (KT) LAND 20 21 24 27 31 41 52 63 71 74 77 80 81
V (KT) LGEM 20 20 21 22 24 28 33 38 44 49 53 56 57
Storm Type TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP

SHEAR (KT) 11 9 11 12 14 19 18 13 5 14 11 12 6
SHEAR ADJ (KT) -2 -5 -5 -3 -3 -7 -11 -3 0 -1 -1 5 9
SHEAR DIR 124 117 92 91 80 53 48 50 345 312 248 256 205
SST (C) 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.2 26.1 26.1 26.8 27.0 27.4
POT. INT. (KT) 127 127 127 127 129 129 127 127 118 120 127 128 131
ADJ. POT. INT. 120 120 120 121 123 124 121 126 121 125 130 128 126
200 MB T (C) -54.2 -54.4 -54.5 -54.3 -54.5 -54.8 -55.0 -54.9 -54.4 -54.7 -54.5 -54.9 -54.4
200 MB VXT (C) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 -0.1
TH_E DEV (C) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 8
700-500 MB RH 65 65 66 69 72 79 81 80 72 62 61 58 58
MODEL VTX (KT) 5 6 6 7 8 11 13 15 16 17 17 17 17
850 MB ENV VOR 48 45 45 45 42 38 24 8 -8 2 30 31 30
200 MB DIV 29 33 27 52 76 74 86 48 28 9 19 64 58
700-850 TADV 0 0 0 0 0 -2 -4 -3 0 8 9 12 1
LAND (KM) 1713 1744 1778 1813 1851 1901 1841 1861 1841 1771 1667 1427 1123
LAT (DEG N) 10.0 10.0 9.9 9.8 9.6 9.2 9.2 10.2 12.9 16.1 18.4 18.8 18.3
LONG(DEG W) 32.5 32.8 33.1 33.4 33.7 34.5 35.1 35.4 37.0 40.7 45.6 50.6 54.0
STM SPEED (KT) 3 3 3 3 4 4 2 11 20 26 24 21 15
HEAT CONTENT 16 16 17 17 18 22 26 25 8 1 8 9 20

FORECAST TRACK FROM TABM INITIAL HEADING/SPEED (DEG/KT):270/ 3 CX,CY: -2/ 0
T-12 MAX WIND: 20 PRESSURE OF STEERING LEVEL (MB): 571 (MEAN=618)
GOES IR BRIGHTNESS TEMP. STD DEV. 50-200 KM RAD: 17.7 (MEAN=14.5)
% GOES IR PIXELS WITH T < -20 C 50-200 KM RAD: 32.0 (MEAN=65.0)
PRELIM RI PROB (DV .GE. 55 KT IN 48 HR): 0.5

INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTENSITY CHANGE
6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
----------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE MEAN CHANGE 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 13.
SST POTENTIAL 0. 1. 1. 2. 5. 11. 17. 22. 26. 29. 32. 34.
VERTICAL SHEAR MAG 1. 2. 3. 3. 3. 2. 1. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1.
VERTICAL SHEAR ADJ 0. 1. 1. 2. 3. 6. 8. 8. 7. 7. 6. 5.
VERTICAL SHEAR DIR 0. 1. 1. 2. 4. 6. 9. 11. 11. 10. 9. 7.
PERSISTENCE -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -0. 0. 0. 1.
200/250 MB TEMP. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 3.
THETA_E EXCESS -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2. -3. -2. -3.
700-500 MB RH -0. -0. -0. -1. -2. -3. -5. -6. -7. -7. -6. -5.
MODEL VTX TENDENCY 0. 0. 1. 2. 5. 8. 9. 11. 11. 10. 10. 9.
850 MB ENV VORTICITY 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. -0. -0. -0. -0.
200 MB DIVERGENCE -0. -0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0.
850-700 T ADVEC 0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -0. -0. -0.
ZONAL STORM MOTION -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2.
STEERING LEVEL PRES 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
DAYS FROM CLIM. PEAK 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2.
GOES PREDICTORS -1. -1. -1. -1. -2. -3. -4. -5. -5. -4. -3. -3.
OCEAN HEAT CONTENT -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -0.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CHANGE 1. 4. 7. 11. 21. 32. 43. 51. 54. 57. 60. 61.

CURRENT MAX WIND (KT): 20. LAT, LON: 10.0 32.5

** 2017 ATLANTIC RI INDEX AL942017 INVEST 07/03/17 00 UTC **
(SHIPS-RII PREDICTOR TABLE for 30 KT OR MORE MAXIMUM WIND INCREASE IN NEXT 24-h)

Predictor Value RI Predictor Range Scaled Value(0-1) % Contribution
12 HR PERSISTENCE (KT): 0.0 -49.5 to 33.0 0.60 999.0
850-200 MB SHEAR (KT) : 11.6 30.1 to 2.9 0.68 999.0
HEAT CONTENT (KJ/cm2) : 16.8 0.0 to 156.2 0.11 999.0
2nd PC OF IR BR TEMP : -0.5 2.4 to -3.0 0.54 999.0
STD DEV OF IR BR TEMP : 17.7 36.6 to 2.8 0.56 999.0
MAXIMUM WIND (kt) : 20.0 22.5 to 121.0 0.00 0.0
POT = MPI-VMAX (KT) : 100.8 28.4 to 139.6 0.65 999.0
D200 (10**7s-1) : 43.4 -29.7 to 181.5 0.35 999.0
BL DRY-AIR FLUX (w/m2): 59.4 961.4 to -67.1 0.88 999.0
% AREA WITH TPW <45 mm: 0.0 100.0 to 0.0 1.00 999.0

SHIPS Prob RI for 20kt/ 12hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean ( 5.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 25kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean (11.5%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 30kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean ( 7.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 35kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean ( 4.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 40kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean ( 2.8%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 45kt/ 36hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean ( 5.1%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 55kt/ 48hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean ( 5.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 65kt/ 72hr RI threshold= 0% is 0.0 times sample mean ( 6.0%)

Matrix of RI probabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RI (kt / h) | 20/12 | 25/24 | 30/24 | 35/24 | 40/24 | 45/36 | 55/48 |65/72
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHIPS-RII: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Logistic: 2.6% 12.4% 5.7% 1.1% 0.4% 3.2% 9.0% 16.0%
Bayesian: 0.5% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.6%
Consensus: 1.0% 4.3% 1.9% 0.4% 0.1% 1.1% 3.0% 5.5%

** PROBLTY OF AT LEAST 1 SCNDRY EYEWL FORMTN EVENT AL942017 INVEST 07/03/2017 00 UTC **
TIME(HR) 0-12 12-24(0-24) 24-36(0-36) 36-48(0-48)
CLIMO(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- PROB BASED ON INTENSITY ONLY
PROB(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- FULL MODEL PROB (RAN NORMALLY)

** DSHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST ADJUSTED RELATIVE TO ONSET OF ERC WEAKENING PHASE **
TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
>24HR AGO (DSHIPS) 20 21 24 27 31 41 52 63 71 74 77 80 81
18HR AGO 20 19 22 25 29 39 50 61 69 72 75 78 79
12HR AGO 20 17 16 19 23 33 44 55 63 66 69 72 73
6HR AGO 20 DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS
NOW CURRENT INTENSITY < 83 KT
IN 6HR INTENSITY IN 6HR < 83 KT
IN 12HR INTENSITY IN 12HR < 83 KT
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139171
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#29 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm

00z GFS operational at 48 hours has closed circulation.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139171
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#30 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:58 pm

More stronger at 78 hours.

Image
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1805
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#31 Postby AtlanticWind » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:02 pm

Gfs Para much stronger 1003 mb
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139171
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#32 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:04 pm

More stronger run at 00z than 18z at this position.(44W)

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1805
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#33 Postby AtlanticWind » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:04 pm

Gfs Para at 1000mb at 96 hours
1 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7282
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#34 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:11 pm

cycloneye wrote:More stronger run at 00z than 18z at this position.(44W)

Image

Also seems to be a bit farther south compared to th 18z at this point
0 likes   

WeatherHoon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:12 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#35 Postby WeatherHoon » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:20 pm

Looks further North to me.
1 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 25
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#36 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:22 pm

What ever happened to the BAMS models?
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 25
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#37 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:24 pm

Totally called this being tagged yesterday, wohoo!

ANYWAY, looks to be our first long-tracker invest, even if it doesn't develop in the long term. 10/60 seems like a good call for now from the NHC, I expect to see "Possible Low-Level INVEST" flight scheduled for 7/5 on the next TCPOD.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

Socalhurcnegirl227
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 267
Age: 35
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:39 pm
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#38 Postby Socalhurcnegirl227 » Sun Jul 02, 2017 11:52 pm

cycloneye wrote:Image

SHIP goes up to almost cat 2.Eagered to see HWRF.

Image

Ill be shocked if they stay on the conservative side. Well know they blew up almost every storm last year to a catastrophic level lol
1 likes   
"I'm a wandress, i'm a one night stand,
dont belong to no city, dont belong to no man
i'm the violence in the pouring rain,
I'm a hurricane"

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 15955
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#39 Postby Yellow Evan » Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:10 am

Disregard SHIPS. It's track has it in the storm's outflow and moves it way too slowly in the short-term.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#40 Postby Hammy » Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:33 am

Hurricane Andrew wrote:What ever happened to the BAMS models?


I think they retired it.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests