CPAC: LANE - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1101 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:00 pm

Sciencerocks wrote:
NotoSans wrote:Highest unflagged SFMR winds reported by the NOAA aircraft were 152 knots so far.



Yep, so the guess of 155 knots is probably a good one.


They probably won't go that high since the flight-level winds support much less and there is a known high bias in very intense hurricanes while deepening. The FL winds support about 130 kt. A blend of the data would be 140-145 kt.
1 likes   

User avatar
Highteeld
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2097
Age: 40
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:10 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1102 Postby Highteeld » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:02 pm

Image

This is not a category 4 hurricane by any stretch of the imagination right now. Keeping it at cat 4 is a disservice to the public.
3 likes   
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --

https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1103 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:07 pm

Highteeld wrote:This is not a category 4 hurricane by any stretch of the imagination right now. Keeping it at cat 4 is a disservice to the public.


The SFMR does have a known significant high bias, and flight-level winds don't support cat 5 yet. But it is up to CPHC. Pressure looks to be around 924.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1104 Postby Alyono » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:08 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Highteeld wrote:This is not a category 4 hurricane by any stretch of the imagination right now. Keeping it at cat 4 is a disservice to the public.


The SFMR does have a known significant high bias, and flight-level winds don't support cat 5 yet. But it is up to CPHC. Pressure looks to be around 924.


That is a matter of question. HRD scientists who maintain the SFMR do not actually agree with the NHC assessment of the high bias
4 likes   

User avatar
BYG Jacob
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:46 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1105 Postby BYG Jacob » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:09 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Highteeld wrote:This is not a category 4 hurricane by any stretch of the imagination right now. Keeping it at cat 4 is a disservice to the public.


The SFMR does have a known significant high bias, and flight-level winds don't support cat 5 yet. But it is up to CPHC. Pressure looks to be around 924.


Uhhhh, what?
0 likes   

User avatar
Siker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1106 Postby Siker » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:10 pm

Image
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1107 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:15 pm

I may be wrong but I believe last year in the Atlantic that it was shown with several cat 5s that the surface winds at the peak was similar to flight level winds and even stronger in some instances, confirmed by dropsonde data that showed a similar profile.
3 likes   

typhoonty
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 94
Age: 29
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 10:37 pm
Location: Fort Myers / Tallahassee, FL
Contact:

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1108 Postby typhoonty » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:16 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Highteeld wrote:This is not a category 4 hurricane by any stretch of the imagination right now. Keeping it at cat 4 is a disservice to the public.


The SFMR does have a known significant high bias, and flight-level winds don't support cat 5 yet. But it is up to CPHC. Pressure looks to be around 924.


Respectively disagree, Craig. SFMR doesn't have a significant high bias and if it did there would be a ratio like FL winds. Now you could argue SFMR should be discounted when the values are higher than FL, which has happened a few times with Lane. However, even based on the amount I could conceivably drop the speeds due to this discrepancy, I still wouldn't go lower than 140-145 knots.
1 likes   
FSU Meteorology student, opinions are mine, 18 years experience covering TC's, consult NHC/Local officials when making decisions.

Gabrielle '01, Michelle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Dennis '05, Katrina '05, Rita '05, Wilma '05, Fay '08, Isaac '12 Hermine '16, Irma '17, Gordon '18, Michael '18, Eta '20 IAN '22

Chris90
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 638
Age: 34
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:36 pm

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1109 Postby Chris90 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:17 pm

I'd just like to quickly mention they called the SFMR readings for Irma into question in her TCR, but I never saw them call any of the SFMR readings for Maria into question. So that high bias seemed to be situational last year. I thought they made some alterations to the SFMR algorithm back in 2015 to correct some biases, so it was more accurate. I think some eyewall dropsondes will help give a better idea of how accurate that 154kt reading for Lane is.
1 likes   
Solar Aquarian
Lunar Cancerian
:uarrow: Sagittarian

User avatar
BYG Jacob
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:46 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1110 Postby BYG Jacob » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:18 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:I may be wrong but I believe last year in the Atlantic that it was shown with several cat 5s that the surface winds at the peak was similar to flight level winds and even stronger in some instances, confirmed by dropsonde data that showed a similar profile.

Both Irma and Maria last year
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1111 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:19 pm

typhoonty wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
Highteeld wrote:This is not a category 4 hurricane by any stretch of the imagination right now. Keeping it at cat 4 is a disservice to the public.


The SFMR does have a known significant high bias, and flight-level winds don't support cat 5 yet. But it is up to CPHC. Pressure looks to be around 924.


Respectively disagree, Craig. SFMR doesn't have a significant high bias and if it did there would be a ratio like FL winds. Now you could argue SFMR should be discounted when the values are higher than FL, which has happened a few times with Lane. However, even based on the amount I could conceivably drop the speeds due to this discrepancy, I still wouldn't go lower than 140-145 knots.


I was thinking based on findings from Irma, Jose and Maria. I would still go 140-145 kt, but if the SFMR was taken at face value that would support 155 kt. We'll know in about 90 minutes what they decide.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1915
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Williamsburg VA for college, Bermuda otherwise

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1112 Postby Kazmit » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:21 pm

The satellite view of this looks a lot like Jose from last year- similar stadium eye, banding, and intensity.
1 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1113 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:22 pm

Dropsonde: pressure 926 mb (927/13).
0 likes   

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1366
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1114 Postby NotoSans » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:22 pm

Looks like LANE is near its peak now as central pressure has started to level off. Satellite imagery also shows that central convection in the western side has started to warm.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1115 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:25 pm

I believe 926 is the lowest actually measured pressure ever in the central Pacific. Ioke was lower (as low as 915) but that was only from satellite estimates.
1 likes   

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1366
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1116 Postby NotoSans » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:27 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:I believe 926 is the lowest actually measured pressure ever in the central Pacific. Ioke was lower (as low as 915) but that was only from satellite estimates.

Lowest pressure recorded by recon for a CPAC hurricane would be 929mb for John'94 IIRC.
(Ironically CPHC assessed John's peak intensity at 150 knots and I guess that's what we should except for a typical 929-mb CPAC hurricane.)
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

User avatar
Iune
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: New York City

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1117 Postby Iune » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:31 pm

NotoSans wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:I believe 926 is the lowest actually measured pressure ever in the central Pacific. Ioke was lower (as low as 915) but that was only from satellite estimates.

Lowest pressure recorded by recon for a CPAC hurricane would be 929mb for John'94 IIRC.
(Ironically CPHC assessed John's peak intensity at 150 knots and I guess that's what we should except for a typical 929-mb CPAC hurricane.)


If I remember right, the 929 mbar pressure was when John was weaker. The 150 kts didn't have a recon measured pressure.
0 likes   
Floyd 1999 · Irene 2011 · Sandy 2012

User avatar
BYG Jacob
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:46 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1118 Postby BYG Jacob » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:32 pm

VDM says that SFMR was legit, lets see what the CHPC says.
0 likes   

User avatar
BYG Jacob
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:46 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1119 Postby BYG Jacob » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:34 pm

CHPC went with 140 knots and 922 mb. Fair enough, I guess.
0 likes   

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1366
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Re: CPAC: LANE - Hurricane

#1120 Postby NotoSans » Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:36 pm

Special advisory within the next hour.

...NOAA AIRCRAFT FINDS THAT LANE HAS STRENGTHENED TO A CATEGORY 5
HURRICANE...

Data from the NOAA P-3 aircraft indicate that Lane has continued to
intensify this afternoon. Maximum sustained winds have increased to
near 160 mph (260 km/h), making Lane an extremely dangerous category
5 hurricane. A special advisory will be issued within the hour.


SUMMARY OF 620 PM HST...0420 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...14.5N 154.0W
ABOUT 375 MI...605 KM SSE OF KAILUA-KONA HAWAII
ABOUT 535 MI...860 KM SSE OF HONOLULU HAWAII
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...160 MPH...260 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...WNW OR 285 DEGREES AT 9 MPH...15 KM/H
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...922 MB...27.23 INCHES
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests