ATL: BARRY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 423
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#21 Postby mcheer23 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:09 am

LeonardRay wrote:GFS has a 1004mb system moving into bolivar at 114 hours


Actually takes a SW jog after that frame, makes landfall near Freeport, TX
1 likes   

User avatar
TheAustinMan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1010
Age: 24
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:26 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#22 Postby TheAustinMan » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:14 am

Steve wrote:Re UK Met:

974mb is pretty low for 62k winds (71+ mph). But I guess it could be a case where the pressure falls quickly there for a while without the opportunity for the winds to correspondingly follow. The UK Track takes it in near Grand Isle/Port Fourchon with a slightly west of due north heading and inland toward Livingston Parish (east of Baton Rouge) and then gradually brings it northward (east of due north) toward a position just west of Jackson, MS.


That may indeed be the case, given that in general the model depictions for 92L haven't been particularly coalesced, but I will caution that UKMET's pressure-wind relationships are generally not very good from what I've seen, regardless of winds lagging pressures (as is the case with many global models).
2 likes   
ImageImageImage
Treat my opinions with a grain of salt. For official information see your local weather service.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8608
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#23 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:14 am

mcheer23 wrote:
LeonardRay wrote:GFS has a 1004mb system moving into bolivar at 114 hours


Actually takes a SW jog after that frame, makes landfall near Freeport, TX


It's a different take than the OG GFS which brings a tightening storm into around Grand Isle at 138 but seriously intensifies it the 12 hours preceding the below plot. If it's wrong again as the GFS often was, glad (?) we replaced it with New GFS. IDK.

Image
Last edited by Steve on Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

stormlover2013
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:06 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#24 Postby stormlover2013 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:15 am

Steve wrote:Re UK Met:

974mb is pretty low for 62k winds (71+ mph). But I guess it could be a case where the pressure falls quickly there for a while without the opportunity for the winds to correspondingly follow. The UK Track takes it in near Grand Isle/Port Fourchon with a slightly west of due north heading and inland toward Livingston Parish (east of Baton Rouge) and then gradually brings it northward (east of due north) toward a position just west of Jackson, MS.



Trending towards euro
1 likes   

User avatar
Siker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#25 Postby Siker » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:20 am

Steve wrote:Re UK Met:

974mb is pretty low for 62k winds (71+ mph). But I guess it could be a case where the pressure falls quickly there for a while without the opportunity for the winds to correspondingly follow. The UK Track takes it in near Grand Isle/Port Fourchon with a slightly west of due north heading and inland toward Livingston Parish (east of Baton Rouge) and then gradually brings it northward (east of due north) toward a position just west of Jackson, MS.


As AustinMan said, that's almost certainly an artifact of low-resolution of that UKMET output. Anything below 990mb on the UKMET I would safely bump the winds up by 15kt. I remember there was a run during Irma that had a central pressure near 930 but winds of 85kt.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8608
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#26 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:22 am

Agreed.

JMA is slightly more defined and farther SW in the Gulf at 72 hours which is as far as I can get it.

Canadian seemed to be the last outlier and just dropped it in the Gulf, moved it west a bit and kicked it back up intensified into the Panhandle. It's only out to 36 hours, but in the next few minutes, we'll have to see if it too has figured out a different solution or if it's going to stick to its proverbial guns.
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 780
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#27 Postby ColdMiser123 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:25 am

Steve wrote:Agreed.

JMA is slightly more defined and farther SW in the Gulf at 72 hours which is as far as I can get it.

Canadian seemed to be the last outlier and just dropped it in the Gulf, moved it west a bit and kicked it back up intensified into the Panhandle. It's only out to 36 hours, but in the next few minutes, we'll have to see if it too has figured out a different solution or if it's going to stick to its proverbial guns.


Going to make landfall in southern Louisiana this run.
1 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
Siker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:36 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#28 Postby Siker » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:29 am

Need to find the script I made last season for plotting UKMET data from that text product. Might have deleted it on accident.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8608
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#29 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:30 am

ColdMiser123 wrote:
Steve wrote:Agreed.

JMA is slightly more defined and farther SW in the Gulf at 72 hours which is as far as I can get it.

Canadian seemed to be the last outlier and just dropped it in the Gulf, moved it west a bit and kicked it back up intensified into the Panhandle. It's only out to 36 hours, but in the next few minutes, we'll have to see if it too has figured out a different solution or if it's going to stick to its proverbial guns.


Going to make landfall in southern Louisiana this run.


That was kind of the last holdout of the major models, so clearly that's changed. Now to see if they run the HWRF/HMON which should start showing in the next 25-35 minutes if so. I can't remember which one runs first (around noon) and which one starts showing up after that on TT.

Here is CMC at 84 hours

Image
0 likes   

stormlover2013
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:06 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#30 Postby stormlover2013 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:42 am

Cmc is trending west, so we have a trend
1 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#31 Postby MississippiWx » Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:43 am

CMC into Grand Isle at 114 hours. 997mb, intensifying rather quickly and strongest run yet.
1 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8608
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#32 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:18 pm

MississippiWx wrote:CMC into Grand Isle at 114 hours. 997mb, intensifying rather quickly and strongest run yet.


Looks to be the eastern outlier now with the western outlier being on the southern side of SE Texas. Let's see what the EC does at 12z, because it is no longer either the only western solution (since everyone else joined in) or even the western-most solution based on comparisons with some of the 12z models.
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#33 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:26 pm

mjo moving into gulf that could help 92l
0 likes   

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3310
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#34 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:44 pm

Euro just initialized, lets see what it shows.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#35 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:06 pm

Through 48 hrs the Euro is fairly close to last night's run.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33393
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#36 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:10 pm

NDG wrote:Through 48 hrs the Euro is fairly close to last night's run.


A touch farther south and west. The farther southwest it goes, I think the stronger it could get as it gets deeper warm water and loses some continental dry air.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#37 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:10 pm

Through 72 hrs is also identical to last night's forecasted position and strength for the same time.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#38 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:11 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
NDG wrote:Through 48 hrs the Euro is fairly close to last night's run.


A touch farther south and west. The farther southwest it goes, I think the stronger it could get as it gets deeper warm water and loses some continental dry air.


I'm comparing it to last night's run, not yesterday's 12z run.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8608
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#39 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:14 pm

72 hours it's a bit WSW of the 00z run and maybe slightly weaker on the low-res (1007 vs. 1005 at 00z).

What appears to be happening is that when the low gets into the GoM, 92L will round the southern periphery of high pressure in a mouth/smile like pattern with a fairly shallow arc at least through the middle of the run.

EC 00Z @ 72 hours
Image

Can't get 12z to work at all for some odd reason. Y'all know where it is.
Last edited by Steve on Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

LeonardRay
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 3:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#40 Postby LeonardRay » Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:15 pm

at 96 hours looks like it might bomb
0 likes   


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests