ATL: IOTA - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Cunxi Huang
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 323
Age: 25
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1481 Postby Cunxi Huang » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:32 pm

232030 1350N 08255W 6978 02768 9575 +145 +111 093119 122 088 001 00
232100 1349N 08255W 6966 02742 9530 +143 +129 094106 118 088 003 00
232130 1347N 08256W 6960 02712 9480 +157 +124 095106 107 088 002 03
232200 1346N 08256W 6967 02655 9426 +163 +125 095109 109 085 000 00
232230 1344N 08256W 6965 02606 9366 +168 +123 097110 113 091 000 00
232300 1342N 08256W 6962 02537 9310 +152 +146 098112 119 093 002 00


North quad FL 122 kt SFMR 93 kt. wut. :double:
0 likes   
2006 SuTY SAOMAI | 2009 TY LINFA | 2010 TY FANAPI | 2010 SuTY MEGI | 2016 SuTY MERANTI | 2019 SuTY LEKIMA
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1482 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:33 pm

Pressure has not risen much if any but winds are likely a lot lower now. Should be a CAT4 landfall.

Image
Last edited by supercane4867 on Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1483 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:35 pm

Remember the northern eyewall is the weakest part as shown on microwave

Image
3 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1484 Postby NDG » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:36 pm

aspen wrote:The N quadrant is unusually weak — 120/125 kt FL, and only 90/95 kt SFMR. Recon also wasn’t able to get the lowest pressure, although it’s still in the high 910s.


Last recon the strongest winds were in the nw & sw eyewall.
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 779
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1485 Postby ColdMiser123 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:36 pm

This is my concern with SFMR measurements as those measurements get closer to the coast in shallow water, a peak SFMR value of 93 kt in the northern eyewall with pressure ~920 mb is unheard of for a Caribbean tropical system.

That is my concern for Hurricanes Sally and Zeta as well concerning potentially faulty SFMR measurements in shallow water.

Image
3 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1486 Postby NDG » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:40 pm

First pass doesn’t support a Cat 5
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4561
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1487 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:41 pm

Very likely back down to Cat 4 now and will be at landfall. Catastrophic nonetheless though
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14933
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1488 Postby NDG » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:41 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:This is my concern with SFMR measurements as those measurements get closer to the coast in shallow water, a peak SFMR value of 93 kt in the northern eyewall with pressure ~920 mb is unheard of for a Caribbean tropical system.

That is my concern for Hurricanes Sally and Zeta as well concerning potentially faulty SFMR measurements in shallow water.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Caribbean_Sea_Gulf_of_Mexico_shaded_relief_bathymetry_land_map.png/310px-Caribbean_Sea_Gulf_of_Mexico_shaded_relief_bathymetry_land_map.png


But flight level winds are also down.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10348
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1489 Postby Sanibel » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:41 pm

Is there an intensity max connected to latitude that far south?

Could be an SST damper...
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 779
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1490 Postby ColdMiser123 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:44 pm

NDG wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:This is my concern with SFMR measurements as those measurements get closer to the coast in shallow water, a peak SFMR value of 93 kt in the northern eyewall with pressure ~920 mb is unheard of for a Caribbean tropical system.

That is my concern for Hurricanes Sally and Zeta as well concerning potentially faulty SFMR measurements in shallow water.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Caribbean_Sea_Gulf_of_Mexico_shaded_relief_bathymetry_land_map.png/310px-Caribbean_Sea_Gulf_of_Mexico_shaded_relief_bathymetry_land_map.png


But flight level winds are also down.


Yeah, the combination of a cooler eye plus the coldest convection now downshear suggested this was no longer a Category 5.

We'll have to see what pressure the dropsonde splashed at since the extrapolated pressure to dropsonde pressure relationship varies with flights, but it doesn't seem like there has been any significant pressure rise yet based on extrapolated pressure values.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8057
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1491 Postby aspen » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:47 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:
NDG wrote:
ColdMiser123 wrote:This is my concern with SFMR measurements as those measurements get closer to the coast in shallow water, a peak SFMR value of 93 kt in the northern eyewall with pressure ~920 mb is unheard of for a Caribbean tropical system.

That is my concern for Hurricanes Sally and Zeta as well concerning potentially faulty SFMR measurements in shallow water.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Caribbean_Sea_Gulf_of_Mexico_shaded_relief_bathymetry_land_map.png/310px-Caribbean_Sea_Gulf_of_Mexico_shaded_relief_bathymetry_land_map.png


But flight level winds are also down.


Yeah, the combination of a cooler eye plus the coldest convection now downshear suggested this was no longer a Category 5.

We'll have to see what pressure the dropsonde splashed at since the extrapolated pressure to dropsonde pressure relationship varies with flights, but it doesn't seem like there has been any significant pressure rise yet based on extrapolated pressure values.

The extrapolated pressure is very similar to the end of the last flight, and it’s possible it might’ve gone below 916 mbar; pressure readings cut out briefly a few times while the plane was in the eye.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 779
Age: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1492 Postby ColdMiser123 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:51 pm

Dropsonde splashed at 919 mb with a 17 kt surface wind, supports 917-918 mb. No pressure rise so far.
Last edited by ColdMiser123 on Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5535
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1493 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:54 pm

Microwave seems to tell a different story, but IR looks to me like some kind of structural change is occurring that’s flattening the gradient. Ring of deepest convection appears removed from the immediate eyewall. Maybe upwelling?
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1494 Postby supercane4867 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:59 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:Microwave seems to tell a different story, but IR looks to me like some kind of structural change is occurring that’s flattening the gradient. Ring of deepest convection appears removed from the immediate eyewall. Maybe upwelling?

Broadening wind field without any pressure rise. Shallow coastal water induced upwelling could explain this.
0 likes   

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1495 Postby wx98 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:00 pm

NDG wrote:First pass doesn’t support a Cat 5

I was still thinking probably a 120 kt/140 mph Cat 4.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4561
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1496 Postby ElectricStorm » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:01 pm

wx98 wrote:
NDG wrote:First pass doesn’t support a Cat 5

I was still thinking probably a 120 kt/140 mph Cat 4.

Nah it won't be that low. Not with a 919 mb pressure. More like 130-135kts
Last edited by ElectricStorm on Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

ClarCari
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:02 am

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1497 Postby ClarCari » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:01 pm

Kept at Cat. 5 for Int. Adv. for cautionary reasons.

I imagine they either expect it to continue strengthening to “regain” Cat. 5 data upon landfall, or an EWRC to weaken it before landfall. Whatever happens should be apparent by the Full Advisory and NHC intensity then should reflect that.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22482
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1498 Postby wxman57 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:01 pm

May be starting an eyewall replacement cycle. Storms can lose a couple categories during such a replacement. Earlier microwave suggested a "moat" was forming outside the eyewall.
2 likes   

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1499 Postby wx98 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:03 pm

They’re keeping Cat 5, but I’d expect a postseason downgrade for 0z and maybe even 18z.
7:00 PM EST Mon Nov 16
Location: 13.6°N 83.0°W
Moving: W at 9 mph
Min pressure: 918 mb
Max sustained: 160 mph


I know it was definitely Cat 5 this morning at 12z.
1 likes   

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: IOTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1500 Postby wx98 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:03 pm

Weather Dude wrote:
wx98 wrote:
NDG wrote:First pass doesn’t support a Cat 5

I was still thinking probably a 120 kt/140 mph Cat 4.

Nah it won't be that low. Not with a 919 mb pressure

Katrina made landfall as a 125 mph Cat 3 at 920.
1 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests