ATL: GRACE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22480
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

ATL: GRACE - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#741 Postby wxman57 » Wed Aug 18, 2021 9:35 am

For Grace, the UKMET has performed best, as it kept Grace south of Cuba. Consensus and NHC the worst at 120 hrs. GFS and NOGAPS generally the worst models.

http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/btang/tcguidance/al072021/
2 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#742 Postby aspen » Wed Aug 18, 2021 2:32 pm

12z HWRF continues to trend weaker, with a Cat 2/3 making landfall in Veracruz.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139048
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#743 Postby cycloneye » Wed Aug 18, 2021 2:34 pm

aspen wrote:12z HWRF continues to trend weaker, with a Cat 2/3 making landfall in Veracruz.


Cat 2/3 is a strong cane.
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15434
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#744 Postby Kingarabian » Wed Aug 18, 2021 2:44 pm

Models still showing that this will cross over into the EPAC.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#745 Postby aspen » Wed Aug 18, 2021 2:44 pm

cycloneye wrote:
aspen wrote:12z HWRF continues to trend weaker, with a Cat 2/3 making landfall in Veracruz.


Cat 2/3 is a strong cane.

Better than and not as ludicrous as a 130 kt Cat 4. It’s the trend that’s important: the HWRF has Grace take longer and longer each run to recover after moving over the Yucatán. We’ll have to wait and see how it is tomorrow night to judge of the HWRF is right.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#746 Postby IcyTundra » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:22 pm

For the 2nd Mexico landfall 00Z ICON has 969 MB and GFS has 978 MB.
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1767
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#747 Postby kevin » Thu Aug 19, 2021 4:02 am

06z ICON initialized quite well (good position but a bit too weak, 992 mb). Shows pretty much no weakening due to Yucatan (goes to 995 mb, but immediately returns to 993 mb above water). Afterwards Grace quickly intensifies to 964 mb before landfall.

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#748 Postby aspen » Thu Aug 19, 2021 5:50 am

Last night’s 18z HWRF successfully predicted the 00z and 06z satellite presentations. Let’s see if it’ll be right about Grace emerging as an anemic TC.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1767
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#749 Postby kevin » Thu Aug 19, 2021 6:12 am

Today's 06z models. It seems there is a consensus of a landfalling pressure of roughly 965 - 970 mbar. Winds are still more uncertain with models ranging from a high-end cat 1 (GFS) to a cat 3 MH.

GFS = 970 mb / 82 kt / Cat 1
ICON = 964 mb / 85 kt / Cat 2
HWRF = 972 mb / 89 kt / Cat 2
HMON = 969 mbar / 102 kt / Cat 3
2 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#750 Postby aspen » Thu Aug 19, 2021 6:00 pm

18z HWRF shows Grace rolling off the Yucatán as a 55kt/990mb TS, which lines up very well with what recon has found so far. Just 12 hours later on this run, Grace is a convectively active 70-75 kt hurricane.

Update: peaks as a 961mb/110kt Cat 3 before landfall around 12-2am Saturday. This HWRF run has Grace 2 hours behind its current position, so take off 2 hours from the time of landfall on this run.
2 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

IcyTundra
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 885
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#751 Postby IcyTundra » Thu Aug 19, 2021 10:29 pm

0Z ICON has 975 MB at landfall. 18Z had 980 MB at landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4525
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#752 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Aug 19, 2021 11:53 pm

HMON keeps it in the 990's for another 9 hours and then BOMBS it to 960 before landfall. That's like 30mb in 18 hours!
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4525
Age: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#753 Postby ElectricStorm » Fri Aug 20, 2021 12:03 am

HWRF also keeps it in the 990's for the next 9 hours and then bombs it into a major, but not as deep as HMON. Peaks at 968mb, landfalls at 970. Max winds on both models are pretty close to each other in the Cat 3 range at peak.
0 likes   
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

Boomer Sooner!

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1767
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#754 Postby kevin » Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:47 am

Even with only 24 hours to go, HMON is not backing down. 961 mbar, 117 kt MH landfall. If that verifies it would be the most significant non-Yucatan Atlantic landfall for Mexico in quite some time right? Which storm (if any) has ever made landfall on the Atlantic side of Mexico with such intensity (excluding Yucatan landfalls)?

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1767
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#755 Postby kevin » Fri Aug 20, 2021 6:02 am

kevin wrote:Even with only 24 hours to go, HMON is not backing down. 961 mbar, 117 kt MH landfall. If that verifies it would be the most significant non-Yucatan Atlantic landfall for Mexico in quite some time right? Which storm (if any) has ever made landfall on the Atlantic side of Mexico with such intensity (excluding Yucatan landfalls)?

https://i.imgur.com/Vor5sAA.png


Decided to do some research and the following major hurricanes fit this description. So Grace could be the most intense hurricane to make landfall on this side of Mexico since Karl in 2010 or even Emily in 2005.

2010 - Karl - Category 3 landfall (976 mb, 100 kt)
2005 - Emily - Category 3 landfall (944 mb, 110 kt)
1988 - Gilbert - Category 3 landfall (955 mb, 110 kt)
1977 - Anita - Category 5 landfall (926 mb, 150 kt)
1966 - Inez - Category 3 landfall (961 mb, 105 kt)
1955 - Hilda - Category 3 landfall (952 mb, 105 kt)
1951 - Charlie - Category 3 landfall (968 mb, 100 kt)
1880 - #2 - Category 4 landfall (931 mb, 130 kt)
2 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#756 Postby BobHarlem » Fri Aug 20, 2021 1:57 pm

2 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8056
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: GRACE - Models

#757 Postby aspen » Sat Aug 21, 2021 4:23 pm

Say what you want about the HWRF this year, but it actually did very well with Grace in the last 3 days before landfall in Veracruz. It corrected forecast Grace:
—developing a tiny core after Jamaica
—staying as a Cat 1 in the WCar
—emerging off of the Yucatán as a rather anemic storm
—quickly becoming very convectively active by Friday morning
—undergoing significant RI into a Cat 3 in the final 12 hours before landfall

I think one run even got Grace’s peak intensity right: 110 kt with a pressure in the low 960s.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests