Sciencerocks wrote:https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/5840/vNrcKy.gif
No image.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:LarryWx wrote: Bret became a TS at 42.2W, which is the furthest east of any ON RECORD in June back to 1851.
Bret would not likely have been identified at 42W prior to modern satellite. You really can't go back to 1851 and say it's never happened.
Sciencerocks wrote:https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/5840/vNrcKy.gif
LarryWx wrote:wxman57 wrote:LarryWx wrote: Bret became a TS at 42.2W, which is the furthest east of any ON RECORD in June back to 1851.
Bret would not likely have been identified at 42W prior to modern satellite. You really can't go back to 1851 and say it's never happened.
I agree and I didn't at all say it never happened. That's why I said and capitalized "ON RECORD" as well as saying "back to 1851". So, "on record" implies that some could have been missed and "back to 1851" implies that nothing from 1850 and earlier would even make this dataset.
However, modern satellites do go back a good number of decades. Thus, I feel it is still well worth noting since it is quite an anomaly.
Aside: the June TC from 1933 is on the record as becoming a TD near 42.5W despite no satellite.
GCANE wrote:Bret getting dressed for a night out in the Carib
GCANE wrote:Looks like it did open up as a wave
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests