ATL: GABRIELLE - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#1581 Postby Hammy » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:22 pm

8pm TWO will be quite interesting to see given the recent organization.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139027
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1582 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:27 pm

HurricaneDREW92 wrote:If its a TD/TS advisory at 11pm?


Not at 11 PM,unless it organizes very quickly,NHC will be more conservative as is not affecting any landmass right now although Bermuda may be on it's path in a few days.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Riptide
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 753
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:33 pm
Location: Cape May, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1583 Postby Riptide » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:31 pm

cycloneye wrote:
HurricaneDREW92 wrote:If its a TD/TS advisory at 11pm?


Not at 11 PM,unless it organizes very quickly,NHC will be more conservative as is not affecting any landmass right now although Bermuda may be on it's path in a few days.

A tropical storm exists and should be classified as such if convection continues. NHC is not known to be conservative to justify their forecasts but they should call it before or at 11pm. There is a chance they wait untill morning in order to observe the visible satellite.
0 likes   

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1584 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:35 pm

I see it moving due north to just a click east of due north. Don't see it stalling or getting trapped under the ridge. Seems to be picking up plenty of speed this afternoon and nothing to slow it down.
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1585 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:40 pm

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:I see it moving due north to just a click east of due north. Don't see it stalling or getting trapped under the ridge. Seems to be picking up plenty of speed this afternoon and nothing to slow it down.


the convection being blown that direction.. earlier when llc was exposed was drifting nw


also the ridge really beginning to build north of it.. it has a small window left to get out before the ridge stops it.. have to keep waiting...

and watch the loop..
http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/a ... 1java.html

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1586 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:50 pm

Aric, while I really enjoy your in depth analysis of systems over the years i just have to disagree with you on this one. See nothing that shows this will slow down and get trapped and turned back w or WSW. Now if that ull was moving west then maybe but its not either.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1587 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:56 pm

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:Aric, while I really enjoy your in depth analysis of systems over the years i just have to disagree with you on this one. See nothing that shows this will slow down and get trapped and turned back w or WSW. Now if that ull was moving west then maybe but its not either.


oh the break is there all im saying is that it had better start moving a little faster all the models show the western atlantic ridging building in over the next 24 to 48 hours.. also if that upper low cuts off ( which it might ) it may begin to retrograde.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1588 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:23 pm

We shall see. :wink:

Maybe you can visit on over to the gulf thread and dig around and find a possiblity for the potential gulf disturbance to move more north instead of mexico and bring us some relief :lol:
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1589 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:24 pm

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:We shall see. :wink:

Maybe you can visit on over to the gulf thread and dig around and find a possiblity for the potential gulf disturbance to move more north instead of mexico and bring us some relief :lol:


nope no chance... lol j/k :P
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ninel conde
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1245
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:18 pm

#1590 Postby ninel conde » Mon Sep 09, 2013 6:00 pm

Joe Bastardi ‏@BigJoeBastardi 29m

Just cut Raging Weatherbull video on http://Weatherbell.com premium on Gabrielle explaining how its in favorable position to develop
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139027
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1591 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 09, 2013 6:28 pm

40%-50%

THE ELONGATED AREA OF LOW PRESSURE...THE REMNANTS OF GABRIELLE...
LOCATED ABOUT 350 MILES SOUTH OF BERMUDA HAS BECOME BETTER DEFINED
THIS AFTERNOON. SHOWER AND THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY HAS ALSO INCREASED
TO THE EAST OF THE CENTER. WHILE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ARE NOT
VERY CONDUCIVE FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT...ONLY A SMALL INCREASE IN
THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS COULD LEAD TO THE
FORMATION OF A TROPICAL DEPRESSION DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO WHILE
THE LOW MOVES NORTH-NORTHEASTWARD AT 10 TO 15 MPH. THIS SYSTEM HAS
A MEDIUM CHANCE...40 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE
DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS. BEYOND ABOUT TWO TO THREE DAYS...
CONDITIONS BECOME MORE HOSTILE FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT...AND THIS
SYSTEM HAS A MEDIUM CHANCE...50 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL
CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 5 DAYS. AN AIR FORCE RESERVE RECONNAISSANCE
MISSION IS SCHEDULED TO INVESTIGATE THIS SYSTEM ON TUESDAY
AFTERNOON. INTERESTS IN BERMUDA SHOULD MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THIS
SYSTEM.

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1592 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Mon Sep 09, 2013 6:29 pm

cycloneye wrote:40%-50%

THE ELONGATED AREA OF LOW PRESSURE...THE REMNANTS OF GABRIELLE...
LOCATED ABOUT 350 MILES SOUTH OF BERMUDA HAS BECOME BETTER DEFINED
THIS AFTERNOON. SHOWER AND THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY HAS ALSO INCREASED
TO THE EAST OF THE CENTER. WHILE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ARE NOT
VERY CONDUCIVE FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT...ONLY A SMALL INCREASE IN
THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS COULD LEAD TO THE
FORMATION OF A TROPICAL DEPRESSION DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO WHILE
THE LOW MOVES NORTH-NORTHEASTWARD AT 10 TO 15 MPH. THIS SYSTEM HAS
A MEDIUM CHANCE...40 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE
DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS. BEYOND ABOUT TWO TO THREE DAYS...
CONDITIONS BECOME MORE HOSTILE FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT...AND THIS
SYSTEM HAS A MEDIUM CHANCE...50 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL
CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 5 DAYS. AN AIR FORCE RESERVE RECONNAISSANCE
MISSION IS SCHEDULED TO INVESTIGATE THIS SYSTEM ON TUESDAY
AFTERNOON. INTERESTS IN BERMUDA SHOULD MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THIS
SYSTEM.



Interesting wording hmm
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 20% / 20%

#1593 Postby Hammy » Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:23 pm

HurricaneDREW92 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:40%-50%

THE ELONGATED AREA OF LOW PRESSURE...THE REMNANTS OF GABRIELLE...
LOCATED ABOUT 350 MILES SOUTH OF BERMUDA HAS BECOME BETTER DEFINED
THIS AFTERNOON. SHOWER AND THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY HAS ALSO INCREASED
TO THE EAST OF THE CENTER. WHILE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ARE NOT
VERY CONDUCIVE FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT...ONLY A SMALL INCREASE IN
THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS COULD LEAD TO THE
FORMATION OF A TROPICAL DEPRESSION DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO WHILE
THE LOW MOVES NORTH-NORTHEASTWARD AT 10 TO 15 MPH. THIS SYSTEM HAS
A MEDIUM CHANCE...40 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE
DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS. BEYOND ABOUT TWO TO THREE DAYS...
CONDITIONS BECOME MORE HOSTILE FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT...AND THIS
SYSTEM HAS A MEDIUM CHANCE...50 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL
CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 5 DAYS. AN AIR FORCE RESERVE RECONNAISSANCE
MISSION IS SCHEDULED TO INVESTIGATE THIS SYSTEM ON TUESDAY
AFTERNOON. INTERESTS IN BERMUDA SHOULD MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THIS
SYSTEM.



Interesting wording hmm


could this mean a possible 11pm upgrade if it doesn't collapse by then?
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

supercane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2856
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:27 pm

#1594 Postby supercane » Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:24 pm

First Dvorak classification from SSD in 24hr:
DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
09/2345 UTC 27.3N 65.3W T1.0/1.0 GABRIELLE -- Atlantic

Source:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 26
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#1595 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:27 pm

The NHC should go ahead and declare this a tropical depression at 11pm AST. Convection flared up around 3-4 pm AST.
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 35
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 40% / 50%

#1596 Postby Macrocane » Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:47 pm

It looks very good to my eyes. It looks more symmetric than earlier, outflow is good, deep convection is present and even some banding is developing. A microwave or ASCAT would be very helpful right now.
0 likes   

kat61
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Location: Hampstead,NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 40% / 50%

#1597 Postby kat61 » Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:03 pm

I saw the satellite pics...and it looks suspicious....any chance it can do a loop (look like a fish and then dip and head west)? I just thought it strange that it went orange at that coordinates....that's different...
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23499
Age: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1598 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:10 pm

Looks like it is well on it's way to developing. I have been bullish on this developing and thought the NHC development chances were too low the past couple of days.

I thought it may have had a chance to get trapped by the ridge a couple of days ago but no longer think that is the case. Bermuda threat possibly then out to sea.

Latest IR loop:

Image

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re:

#1599 Postby TheStormExpert » Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:37 pm

gatorcane wrote:Looks like it is well on it's way to developing. I have been bullish on this developing and thought the NHC development chances were too low the past couple of days.

I thought it may have had a chance to get trapped by the ridge a couple of days ago but no longer think that is the case. Bermuda threat possibly then out to sea.

Latest IR loop:

http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/7451/8g09.gif

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Track wise the NHC and all the other forecast models do pretty darn good, intensity wise is sort of almost the complete opposite.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5594
Age: 40
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L (Gabrielle remnants) - Discussion: 40% / 50%

#1600 Postby Hammy » Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:00 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/92L/flash-rbtop-long.html

Would the center by chance be about 27/64.5? And this has got to be the best looking non-classified system I've seen recently.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests