ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Subtrop
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 550
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 9:45 pm

ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#1 Postby Subtrop » Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:39 am

AL, 92, 2021080512, , BEST, 0, 115N, 105W, 20, 1013, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1016, 200, 100, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, S, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, genesis-num, 016, SPAWNINVEST, al772021 to al922021,


https://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/btk/
1 likes   

zhukm29
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#2 Postby zhukm29 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:15 am

The invest is so deep in Africa it's almost off the map :lol:

Image
6 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2101
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#3 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:46 am

Can we merge the tropical wave thread with this one?
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#4 Postby Shell Mound » Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:47 am

As mentioned previously, the monsoonal trough will likely ensure that 92L will eject too far north to affect additional land masses beyond the CV islands. The EPS, while imperfect, tends to handle low-level subtleties better than the GEFS. Of the 06Z GEFS, the strongest members suggest a track southwest of the CV islands, whereas the strongest members of the 00Z EPS suggest a counterclockwise veering northward toward the CV islands. The GEFS tends to underestimate the influence of the monsoonal trough on the evolution and track of nascent vortices.
1 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8765
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#5 Postby aspen » Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:47 am

Oh boy, another 92L. This is gonna be a fun ride.
0 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2101
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#6 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:49 am

Shell Mound wrote:As mentioned previously, the monsoonal trough will likely ensure that 92L will eject too far north to affect additional land masses beyond the CV islands. The EPS, while imperfect, tends to handle low-level subtleties better than the GEFS. Of the 06Z GEFS, the strongest members suggest a track southwest of the CV islands, whereas the strongest members of the 00Z EPS suggest a counterclockwise veering northward toward the CV islands. The GEFS tends to underestimate the influence of the monsoonal trough on the evolution and track of nascent vortices.

The ridge will prevent that. Also why the Nhc has the development region for this system heading west-wnw. Irma may have a little brother here.
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19924
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#7 Postby tolakram » Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:As mentioned previously, the monsoonal trough will likely ensure that 92L will eject too far north to affect additional land masses beyond the CV islands. The EPS, while imperfect, tends to handle low-level subtleties better than the GEFS. Of the 06Z GEFS, the strongest members suggest a track southwest of the CV islands, whereas the strongest members of the 00Z EPS suggest a counterclockwise veering northward toward the CV islands. The GEFS tends to underestimate the influence of the monsoonal trough on the evolution and track of nascent vortices.

The ridge will prevent that. Also why the Nhc has the development region for this system heading west-wnw. Irma may have a little brother here.



Not much of a ridge for a moderate tropical storm. If it stays week or doesn't develop then I *think* it goes west.
Image
4 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3986
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#8 Postby Category5Kaiju » Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:54 am

In terms of track, the wave has not even hit water, so I would be hesistant on saying that it will definitively be OTS or a land-impacter at this point in point. Maybe tomorrow or the day after we'll have a better idea?
7 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4023
Age: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#9 Postby AutoPenalti » Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:28 am

The dreaded 92L.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10104
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#10 Postby SFLcane » Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:36 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:As mentioned previously, the monsoonal trough will likely ensure that 92L will eject too far north to affect additional land masses beyond the CV islands. The EPS, while imperfect, tends to handle low-level subtleties better than the GEFS. Of the 06Z GEFS, the strongest members suggest a track southwest of the CV islands, whereas the strongest members of the 00Z EPS suggest a counterclockwise veering northward toward the CV islands. The GEFS tends to underestimate the influence of the monsoonal trough on the evolution and track of nascent vortices.

The ridge will prevent that. Also why the Nhc has the development region for this system heading west-wnw. Irma may have a little brother here.


There’s 0 comparisons to Irma. Plenty of dry and stable air will hamper development though we might be able To squeeze a short lived TS.
7 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8765
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#11 Postby aspen » Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:48 am

Just because 92L might struggle over the next 5-7 days doesn’t mean that it can’t find a better environment further west if it survives. Storms like Bertha ‘96, Fran, Dean, and Paulette remained at TD/TS intensity for days in the MDR and didn’t reach hurricane intensity until past 55-60W; Fran didn’t even reach TS status until several days after initially forming. In terms of timing and the currently modeled track, Felix ‘95 seems like a decent potential analog, and it also stayed as a weak TS for several days in the MDR. We shouldn’t expect any storm going crazy this east in the MDR until late August at the earliest; storms that reached hurricane intensity east of 35W like Irma and Helene didn’t form until deeper in peak season.
6 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

AlphaToOmega
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:51 am
Location: Somewhere in Massachusetts

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#12 Postby AlphaToOmega » Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:50 am

This might become the earliest Cape Verde storm since Tropical Storm Dorian (2013).
1 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3986
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#13 Postby Category5Kaiju » Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:18 am

I know there are some comparisons being brought up with Irma, but in actuality, if you really look at it, a 37-hour Cat 5 that also basically remained a major hurricane from near the Cape Verde islands all the way up until Cuba? Not quite sure about that
0 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2101
Age: 21
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#14 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:52 am

All I am referring to with Invest 92L and Irma is the track. At least initially.
0 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

wx98
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#15 Postby wx98 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:55 am

InfernoFlameCat wrote:All I am referring to with Invest 92L and Irma is the track. At least initially.

Irma formed just west of Cape Verde at about 16N. 92L is coming off much lower, around 11-12N. The only similarity is that the wave came off of Africa, which of course is the case with all tropical waves.
3 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8765
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#16 Postby aspen » Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:01 pm

wx98 wrote:
InfernoFlameCat wrote:All I am referring to with Invest 92L and Irma is the track. At least initially.

Irma formed just west of Cape Verde at about 16N. 92L is coming off much lower, around 11-12N. The only similarity is that the wave came off of Africa, which of course is the case with all tropical waves.

Irma was strange in how quickly it developed and became a major — just two days after making splashdown — while being rather far north. This year’s MDR temps should prevent something like that from happening, and like I said before, it’s too early for a very strong storm in the eastern MDR.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#17 Postby Shell Mound » Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:10 pm

0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8788
Age: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#18 Postby Sciencerocks » Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:32 pm

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
galaxy401
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2392
Age: 29
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
Location: Casa Grande, Arizona

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#19 Postby galaxy401 » Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:49 pm

Orange now.

Tropical Weather Outlook
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL
200 PM EDT Thu Aug 5 2021

For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico:

1. A tropical wave near the west coast of Africa is producing a large
area of disorganized showers and thunderstorms. The wave is expected
to move off the coasts of Senegal, The Gambia, and Guinea-Bissau
later tonight. Environmental conditions appear somewhat conducive
for gradual development, and a tropical depression is likely to form
over the eastern tropical Atlantic south of the Cabo Verde Islands
by late Saturday or early Sunday while the system moves westward
to west-northwestward at about 15 mph.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...medium...40 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...70 percent.
4 likes   
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.

Chemmers
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:16 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#20 Postby Chemmers » Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:08 pm

Think we will see Fred by this time tomorrow
0 likes   


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests