ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Re:

#10421 Postby dhweather » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:48 am

KWT wrote:southerngale, on another centered slosh model map there is progged to be a peak of 30ft in Jefferson county, just about the biggest surge I've seen sadly.



If that materializes, there's going to be a dramatic change in the ladscape there after Ike. I just hope there are no people there, they are all tucked away high and dry.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10422 Postby PTPatrick » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:49 am

I think surge map is only accurate if it takes that track right over the north end of the island. If its even a hair to the south, say on galvestons west end then the surge will be even higher for the populated areas along the west side of Galveston bay.
Last edited by PTPatrick on Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Solaris
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:54 am

#10423 Postby Solaris » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:50 am

Image

Another eye try? Hmm...
0 likes   

User avatar
funster
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: North Dallas

#10424 Postby funster » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:50 am

Looks like a historic surge for the Chambers, Jefferson and Port Arthur area I guess from all the water being pushed by Ike for hundreds of miles into the northwest corner of the GOM.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10425 Postby PTPatrick » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:52 am

interesting...northwest is dry again. Also more energy in the bands now than last night.
0 likes   

User avatar
hiflyer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 563
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:24 am
Location: West Broward Florida

#10426 Postby hiflyer » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:53 am

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... xico3D.png

Ike is entering shallowing water...next few hours the close to the coast bouy data on wave heights is going to be a good indicator of how bad this may be....

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/radial_search. ... t=A&time=3

Tides for Galveston, Galveston Channel starting with September 12, 2008.

Day High Tide Height
/Low Time Feet
F 12 High 4:49 AM 1.6
12 Low 9:36 AM 1.4
12 High 1:14 PM 1.5
12 Low 9:11 PM 0.3
Sa 13 High 4:53 AM 1.6
13 Low 9:40 AM 1.3
13 High 2:33 PM 1.5
13 Low 9:47 PM 0.4
0 likes   

superfly

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10427 Postby superfly » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:54 am

Looks terrible right now, doubt that it will strengthen any and will probably weaken once it gets closer to land.

Image
0 likes   

PhillyWX
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:54 am
Location: Philly
Contact:

Re: Re:

#10428 Postby PhillyWX » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:54 am

AZRainman wrote:
southerngale wrote:
AZRainman wrote:Latest surge maps
[I haven't seen anything since last night... just now checking things. How accurate are those maps supposed to be? I live in Jefferson County.

New item, guess we shall see how accurate they prove to be..

The SLOSH model is generally accurate within plus or minus 20 percent.

In addition, SLOSH data is available from two FTP sites at the current time; namely
primary: ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/ and backup: ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/surge,
which are not hosted at NHC and have magnitudes more capacity than the original NHC
FTP server. It appears once the data is on the NHC web site plus the ftp sites, everyone's
requirement for SLOSH data should be easily fulfilled. .

http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/nhp/slosh_link.shtm


Great links -- thank you.
0 likes   

Solaris
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:54 am

#10429 Postby Solaris » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:57 am

Latest recon pass shows 954.5 mb extrap, so up a little from earlier this morning.

IMO the satellite presentation is still improved, wouldn't be surprised to see a 940 handle soon.

Meanwhile, oil plattform 42361 has 99 kts!
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20036
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10430 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:57 am

0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#10431 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:58 am

Image

superfly, terrible is the damage it will do. It looks great and maybe poised to intensify.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10432 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:58 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
hiflyer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 563
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:24 am
Location: West Broward Florida

#10433 Postby hiflyer » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:00 am

Last flights out of Hobby Airport south of Houston is around 9am
Regional Jet flying out of IAH on the north side should be over by about Noon
Large jet flying out of IAH should suspend by 2pm

http://www.fly2houston.com/0/1128333/0/1906/
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#10434 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:00 am

superfly, it looks a little messy now but its still a pretty decent looking system, I doubt its weakening...still it really doesn't make a huge difference overall now, the main story will be the surge and that is set in stone now.

Anyway, tolakram already upto 7ft!
Thats 2 and a half feet higher then the slosh model predicted... :eek:
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#10435 Postby shah8 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:02 am

that microwave really sez it all.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#10436 Postby dhweather » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:02 am

AZRainman wrote:
southerngale wrote:
AZRainman wrote:Latest surge maps
[I haven't seen anything since last night... just now checking things. How accurate are those maps supposed to be? I live in Jefferson County.

New item, guess we shall see how accurate they prove to be..

The SLOSH model is generally accurate within plus or minus 20 percent.

In addition, SLOSH data is available from two FTP sites at the current time; namely
primary: ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/ and backup: ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/surge,
which are not hosted at NHC and have magnitudes more capacity than the original NHC
FTP server. It appears once the data is on the NHC web site plus the ftp sites, everyone's
requirement for SLOSH data should be easily fulfilled. .

http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/nhp/slosh_link.shtm



Outstanding data, thank you for the links!


Galveston, Chambers and Jefferson are in grave danger. There's potential for over half of Chambers to be under water.
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10437 Postby drezee » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:02 am

Wind Speed (WSPD): 99.1 kts =114.3614 mph

Wow that is very impressive...even at height...
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6372
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10438 Postby boca » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:03 am

What's the best tv channel feed in Houston to use for info?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20036
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re:

#10439 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:03 am

KWT wrote:superfly, it looks a little messy now but its still a pretty decent looking system, I doubt its weakening...still it really doesn't make a huge difference overall now, the main story will be the surge and that is set in stone now.

Anyway, tolakram already upto 7ft!
Thats 2 and a half feet higher then the slosh model predicted... :eek:


I read it as 4 1/2 feet above normal, the green line. Not sure if that's right or not. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
AZRainman
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:48 pm
Location: Sonoran Desert
Contact:

#10440 Postby AZRainman » Fri Sep 12, 2008 7:04 am

THE SHIPS MODEL DIAGNOSTICS AND ANALYSES FROM CIMMS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SUGGEST THAT IKE IS UNDERGOING ABOUT 15 KT OF NORTHERLY WIND SHEAR. THE SHIPS MODEL FORECASTS SOME NORTHERLY SHEAR TO PERSIST UNTIL LANDFALL. THAT...COMBINED WITH THE LACK OF AN INNER CORE...SUGGESTS SLOW STRENGTHENING AT BEST. HOWEVER...IKE IS PRODUCING ABUNDANT STRONG CONVECTION NEAR AND SOUTH OF THE CENTER...AND THE SHEAR HAS NOT STOPPED THE STORM FROM STRENGTHENING THIS MORNING. THE GFDL AND HWRF MODELS FORECAST SOME MODEST STRENGTHENING BEFORE LANDFALL...WITH THE GFDL FORECASTING AN INTENSITY OF JUST OVER 100 KT. BASED ON THIS...THE INTENSITY FORECAST CALLS FOR IKE TO BECOME A MAJOR HURRICANE IN ABOUT 24 HR. IKE SHOULD WEAKEN AFTER LANDFALL...AND IT IS FORECAST TO LOSE TROPICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN ABOUT 72 HR AS IT MERGES WITH A FRONTAL SYSTEM.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MI ... 0841.shtml
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests