As someone who lives about a mile from the Atlantic coast, I could not imagine having that thing sitting right off shore. Unreal, such a beast of a storm just cruising parallel to the Jamaican coast for now as it intensifies.
NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- eastcoastFL
- Category 5

- Posts: 3971
- Age: 43
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Palm City, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
As someone who lives about a mile from the Atlantic coast, I could not imagine having that thing sitting right off shore. Unreal, such a beast of a storm just cruising parallel to the Jamaican coast for now as it intensifies.
5 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Ohh I hate this hurricane so much!! Praying for Jamaica and Cuba!!
https://x.com/Sekai_WX/status/1982642118754779176
https://x.com/Sekai_WX/status/1982642118754779176
2 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
- Stormgodess
- Category 1

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
Noob question:
Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?
I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.
But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.
Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I swear it feels like these hurricanes know when to time their bursts of intensity in between recon planes. As soon as the mission finishes, Melissa starts to explode with a perfect pink ring.
5 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I’m surprised no one has mentioned its forward speed(or lack of) as one of the factors why the wind speed is relatively low. A hurricanes stronger side is the side with a positive movement vector, the movement of the storm adds to the windspeed. If Melissa was moving 15 MPH, it would likely be a cat 5.
3 likes
- eastcoastFL
- Category 5

- Posts: 3971
- Age: 43
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Palm City, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
A lot of deep red wrapping around the northern eyewall now on radar.
2 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 675
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

6 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
There's no mention of any sort of ERC in the 03z advisory, meld or otherwise, completed or not. As for the SW motion over the past few hours, the NHC thinks this won't have a significant impact on track in the long run:
They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.
Although the eye wobbled a bit to the south recently, this is
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.
They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.
A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft has been
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt
2 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hot take: another phase of ERI may have just started.
https://x.com/MichaelRLowry/status/1982643194988052600
https://x.com/MichaelRLowry/status/1982643194988052600
4 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
- eastcoastFL
- Category 5

- Posts: 3971
- Age: 43
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Palm City, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Stormgodess wrote:cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
Noob question:
Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?
I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.
But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.
Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.
I'm sure the equipment is calibrated before and after every flight but it's quite a rough ride going into storms like this so equipment failure is always a real probability.
2 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5

- Posts: 6211
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Stormgodess wrote:cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
Noob question:
Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?
I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.
But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.
Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.
I can’t speak for the mods, but I don’t think this is an unreasonable question that would require removal.
That said, I’m confident that if the equipment on these flights were miscalibrated, there would be distinct signs. Considering that there are often two planes simultaneously flying through this storm, each dropping dropsondes, you would see notable discrepancies between the plane readings and their respective dropsondes as they overlap each other’s territory. None of that has been seen in any flights in this storm’s existence though.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Melissa is over 90 degree F (32 C) water right now, may be partly why it's blowing up so much right now. (Lightning around the core is off the charts right now)


7 likes
-
Keldeo1997
- Category 2

- Posts: 673
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148150
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Who is going to stay up and post the overnight Air Force mission? Maybe an historic one?
https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 0#p3144680
https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 0#p3144680
3 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I've been watching Melissa the whole day, but of course it started flexing a full -80C/CDG ring just when I went away for half an hour. If the next recon still finds nothing above 125 kt... I'd be speechless.
This explains the wind speed but not the pressure, though.
My guess is that NHC didn't want to explicitly lower the intensity given the landfall threat. In the TCR, I suspect that both the initial Cat 4 upgrade (where the 120 kt was solely based on satellite) and the intensity since the "unofficial eyewall meld" would be lowered.
ATDoel wrote:I’m surprised no one has mentioned its forward speed(or lack of) as one of the factors why the wind speed is relatively low. A hurricanes stronger side is the side with a positive movement vector, the movement of the storm adds to the windspeed. If Melissa was moving 15 MPH, it would likely be a cat 5.
This explains the wind speed but not the pressure, though.
Travorum wrote:There's no mention of any sort of ERC in the 03z advisory, meld or otherwise, completed or not. As for the SW motion over the past few hours, the NHC thinks this won't have a significant impact on track in the long run:Although the eye wobbled a bit to the south recently, this is
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.
They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft has been
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt
My guess is that NHC didn't want to explicitly lower the intensity given the landfall threat. In the TCR, I suspect that both the initial Cat 4 upgrade (where the 120 kt was solely based on satellite) and the intensity since the "unofficial eyewall meld" would be lowered.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Last edited by Teban54 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
- Category5Kaiju
- Category 5

- Posts: 4240
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Looks like Melissa’s about to make a real sprint towards Category 5 now.
4 likes
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.
- Stormgodess
- Category 1

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
cheezyWXguy wrote:Stormgodess wrote:cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
Noob question:
Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?
I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.
But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.
Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.
I can’t speak for the mods, but I don’t think this is an unreasonable question that would require removal.
That said, I’m confident that if the equipment on these flights were miscalibrated, there would be distinct signs. Considering that there are often two planes simultaneously flying through this storm, each dropping dropsondes, you would see notable discrepancies between the plane readings and their respective dropsondes as they overlap each other’s territory. None of that has been seen in any flights in this storm’s existence though.
Thank you to you and eastcoast both. Not having the first clue of how this type of equipment is calibrated/maintained, how difficult, or what the cost is... I just wasnt sure.
And yes I can see how having the second dataset from another plane to compare against, would be helpful. I had never thought of that.
Thank you both so much
4 likes
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Blown Away and 101 guests









