mahicks wrote:looks decent on the zoomed ramsis visible loop...
Or the loop...(click on the left)
http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/rmsd ... PICAL.html
Any comments??
I believe that is the system in the EPAC not TD10
<RICKY>
Moderator: S2k Moderators
mahicks wrote:looks decent on the zoomed ramsis visible loop...
Or the loop...(click on the left)
http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/rmsd ... PICAL.html
Any comments??
WeatherEmperor wrote:mahicks wrote:looks decent on the zoomed ramsis visible loop...
Or the loop...(click on the left)
http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/rmsd ... PICAL.html
Any comments??
I believe that is the system in the EPAC not TD10
<RICKY>
mahicks wrote:looks decent on the zoomed ramsis visible loop...
Or the loop...(click on the left)
http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/rmsd ... PICAL.html
Any comments??
deltadog03 wrote:the ships brings it to CANE status? has that always been showing that?
WeatherEmperor wrote:00z model plots are out. Graphic to update soon.
<RICKY>
http://weather.net-waves.com/modelplot.htm
wxman57 wrote:For the upteenth time, you really have to be careful trusting those BAM models in the subtropics. They're not dynamic like the GFDL, NOGAPS, ECMWF, UKMET, GFS, etc. The BAMS/BAMM/BAMD are very primitive compared to the dynamic models. They're good for basic guidance in the deep tropics south of the Bermuda high, where the atmosphere doesn't change much. Above 20N, there are fronts/tfofs/ridges moving here and there, and the BAM models don't account for the changing flow patterns. That's why the BAM models took Franklin west across Florida into the Gulf while the dynamic models took Franklin out to sea. The BAM models took Irene westward as well. I woudn't even bother to look at the BAMs now for this system. Check out the better dynamic models in the subtropics:
Note the persistent left bias of the BAMs? They don't see the trof approaching the east coast over the weekend:
<img src="http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/guidance/atlantic/early1.png">
wxman57 wrote:For the upteenth time, you really have to be careful trusting those BAM models in the subtropics. They're not dynamic like the GFDL, NOGAPS, ECMWF, UKMET, GFS, etc. The BAMS/BAMM/BAMD are very primitive compared to the dynamic models. They're good for basic guidance in the deep tropics south of the Bermuda high, where the atmosphere doesn't change much. Above 20N, there are fronts/tfofs/ridges moving here and there, and the BAM models don't account for the changing flow patterns. That's why the BAM models took Franklin west across Florida into the Gulf while the dynamic models took Franklin out to sea. The BAM models took Irene westward as well. I woudn't even bother to look at the BAMs now for this system. Check out the better dynamic models in the subtropics:
Note the persistent left bias of the BAMs? They don't see the trof approaching the east coast over the weekend:
<img src="http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/guidance/atlantic/early1.png">
cycloneye wrote:wxman57 wrote:For the upteenth time, you really have to be careful trusting those BAM models in the subtropics. They're not dynamic like the GFDL, NOGAPS, ECMWF, UKMET, GFS, etc. The BAMS/BAMM/BAMD are very primitive compared to the dynamic models. They're good for basic guidance in the deep tropics south of the Bermuda high, where the atmosphere doesn't change much. Above 20N, there are fronts/tfofs/ridges moving here and there, and the BAM models don't account for the changing flow patterns. That's why the BAM models took Franklin west across Florida into the Gulf while the dynamic models took Franklin out to sea. The BAM models took Irene westward as well. I woudn't even bother to look at the BAMs now for this system. Check out the better dynamic models in the subtropics:
Note the persistent left bias of the BAMs? They don't see the trof approaching the east coast over the weekend
57 in other words if models start to run for wave in eastern atlantic the BAM models are better for that system right?
Chigger_Lopez wrote:I dont post a whole lot, but the visible loop shows a decent rotation to my untrained eye. I am a novice but it looks like it is still fighting. I dont know about rapid intensification, but its still in the game.
wxman57 wrote:For the upteenth time, you really have to be careful trusting those BAM models in the subtropics. They're not dynamic like the GFDL, NOGAPS, ECMWF, UKMET, GFS, etc. The BAMS/BAMM/BAMD are very primitive compared to the dynamic models. They're good for basic guidance in the deep tropics south of the Bermuda high, where the atmosphere doesn't change much. Above 20N, there are fronts/tfofs/ridges moving here and there, and the BAM models don't account for the changing flow patterns. That's why the BAM models took Franklin west across Florida into the Gulf while the dynamic models took Franklin out to sea. The BAM models took Irene westward as well. I woudn't even bother to look at the BAMs now for this system. Check out the better dynamic models in the subtropics.
Note the persistent left bias of the BAMs? They don't see the trof approaching the east coast over the weekend.